Skip to main content
×
Home

The Unrealities of Time

  • BAPTISTE LE BIHAN (a1)
Abstract

Is time flowing? A-theorists say ‘yes’, B-theorists say ‘no’. But both take time to be real, which means that B-theorists accept that time is real, even if lacking a property usually ascribed to it. In this paper, I ask what the different properties usually ascribed to time there are in order to draw the list of different possible kinds of realism and anti-realism about time. As we will see, there are three main kinds of anti-realism. I will argue that if time is defined as the universe's fourth dimension, there is no way time could be unreal.

Le temps s’écoule-t-il? Les théoriciens A répondent positivement, les théoriciens B négativement. Les deux camps s’accordent cependant sur la réalité du temps. Cela signifie que les théoriciens B acceptent la réalité du temps en dépit du rejet d’une propriété qui lui est communément attribuée. Dans cet article, je veux examiner les différentes propriétés qui sont généralement attribuées au temps afin de faire la liste des différents types de réalisme et d’anti-réalisme. Nous le verrons, il existe trois types d’anti-réalisme. Je soutiendrai que si l’on définit le temps comme la quatrième dimension de l’univers, l’irréalité du temps est exclue.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Benovsky Jiri 2010Relational and Substantival Ontologies, and the Nature and the Role of Primitives in Ontological Theories.” Erkenntnis 73 (1): 101–21.
Bigelow John 1996Presentism and Properties.” Philosophical Perspectives 10: 3552.
Bourne Craig 2006 A Future for Presentism. Clarendon Press.
Bowin John 2009Aristotle on the Order and Direction of Time.” Apeiron 42 (1): 4978.
Butterfield Jeremy 2002 “The End of Time?”http://www.trin.cam.ac.uk/butterfield/Reviews/BarbourReviewLong.pdf.
Healey Richard 2002Can Physics Coherently Deny the Reality of Time?” In Time, Reality and Experience. Callender Craig (ed.). Cambridge University Press, 293316.
Lewis David 1986 On the Plurality of Worlds. Vol. 322. Cambridge University Press.
Markosian Ned 1993How Fast Does Time Pass?Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (4): 829–44.
Markosian Ned 2004A Defense of Presentism.” Oxford Studies in Metaphysics (3): 4782.
McDaniel Kris 2013John M. E. McTaggart.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2013. Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/mctaggart/.
McTaggart J. Ellis 1908The Unreality of Time.” Mind 17 (68): 457–74.
Mellor David Hugh 1998 Real Time II. Routledge University Press.
Mellor David Hugh 2001The Time of Our Lives.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 48: 4559.
Merricks Trenton 1999Persistence, Parts, and Presentism.” Noûs 33 (3): 421–38.
Miller Kristie 2009Defending Contingentism in Metaphysics.” Dialectica 63 (1): 2349.
Miller Kristie 2010Three Routes to Contingentism in Metaphysics.” Philosophy Compass 5 (11): 965–77.
Oaklander L. Nathan, (Ed.) 2013A-, B-, and R- Theories of Time, A Debate.” In The Future of the Philosophy of Time. Routledge.
Price Huw 1997 Time’s Arrow & Archimedes’ Point: New Directions for the Physics of Time. Oxford University Press.
Rosen Gideon 2006The Limits of Contingency.” In Identity and Modality. Oxford University Press.
Rovelli Carlo 2004 Quantum Gravity. Cambridge University Press.
Russell Bertrand 1903 The Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge University Press.
Russell Bertrand 1938 Principles of Mathematics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
Smart J. J. C 1963 Philosophy And Scientific Realism. Humanities Press.
Zimmerman Dean 1998Temporary Intrinsics and Presentism.” Metaphysics: The Big Questions, 206–19.
Zimmerman Dean 2008The Privileged Present: Defending an ‘A-Theory’ of Time.” Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics, 211–25.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie
  • ISSN: 0012-2173
  • EISSN: 1759-0949
  • URL: /core/journals/dialogue-canadian-philosophical-review-revue-canadienne-de-philosophie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 14 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 157 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.