Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-jtdwj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T09:08:27.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Idle is Idle Talk? One Hundred Years of Rumor Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Pamela Donovan
Pamela Donovan*
Affiliation:
Bloomsburg University, Pennsylvania
Get access

Extract

This paper examines the stability of the concept of rumor in the past century. It is suggested that not only do models of explanation change, but rumors themselves also change - not just in content, but perhaps in the way they are believed or disbelieved. Social scientific interest in rumors begins with the birth of modern psychology in the 19 th century, shifts to social psychology and sociology in mid-20th century, prompted by governmental concern over subversion through rumor during the Second World War, and is finally revived by folklorists in more recent decades. Understood variously as a conduit of the unconscious and otherwise unendorsable thoughts, a mundane communication drift, or an intentional form of deception and provocation, many of our rumor model assumptions are drawn from that era and remain basically unchallenged. A central assumption emerged that ambiguous situations create a vacuum which rumor fills. By the late 1960s, despite a decline in social scientific interest in the topic, a handful of significant empirical and theoretical challenges emerge from scattered studies. The discipline of folklore begins to take more interest in contemporary rumor in the 1970s, and by the early 1990s the rubric of the rumor is almost entirely supplanted in English language scholarship by the ‘urban legend’ (Brunvand, 1981).

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Diogenes , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , February 2007 , pp. 59 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allport, Floyd and Lepkin, Milton (1945) ‘Wartime Rumors of Waste and Special Privilege: Why Some People Believe Them’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 40: 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, Gordon and Postman, Leo (1947) The Psychology of Rumor. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Anthony, Susan (1973) ‘Anxiety and Rumor’, Journal of Social Psychology 89: 91–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arendt, Hannah (1973) The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Becker, Howard S. (1963) Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ben-Amos, Dan (1982) Folklore in Context: Essays. New Delhi: South Asian PublishersGoogle Scholar
Benedict, Ruth (1931) ‘Folklore’, Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 6–6.Google Scholar
Bennett, Gillian E. A. and Smith, Paul (1984) Perspectives on Contemporary Legend. Sheffield: Sheffield University Press.Google Scholar
Best, Joel (1990) Threatened Children: Rhetoric and Concern about Child-Victims. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Best, Joel and Horiuchi, Gerald (1985) ‘The Razor Blade in the Apple: The Social Construction of Urban Legends’, Social Problems 32(2): 488–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordia, Prashant (1996) Rumor interaction patterns on computer-mediated communication networks. PhD dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Bordia, Prashant and DiFonzo, Nicholas (2002) ‘When Social Psychology Became Less Social: Prasad and the History of Rumor Research’, Asian Journal of Social Psychology 5: 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunvand, Jan Harold (1981) The Vanishing Hitchhiker: American Urban Legends and Their Meaning. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Brunvand, Jan Harold (1984) The Choking Doberman and Other ‘New’ Urban Legends. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Brunvand, Jan Harold (1999) Too Good to be True: The Colossal Book of Urban Legends. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Campion-Vincent, Véronique (1990) ‘The Baby-Parts Story: A New Latin American Legend’, Western Folklore 49 (January).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campion-Vincent, Véronique (1997) ‘Organ Theft Narratives’, Western Folklore 56: 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chorus, A. (1953) ‘The Basic Law of Rumor’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 48: 313–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawkins, Richard (1976) The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dégh, Linda (1994) American Folklore and the Mass Media. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Donovan, Pamela (2001) Crime legends in a new medium. PhD dissertation, City University of New York Graduate School, New York.Google Scholar
Donovan, Pamela (2002) ‘Crime Legends in a New Medium: Fact, Fiction, and Loss of Authority’, Theoretical Criminology 6(2): 189–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, Pamela (2004) No Way of Knowing: Crime, Urban Legends, and the Internet. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dundes, Alan (1980) Interpreting Folklore. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Bill (1990) ‘Introduction to the Special Issue: Contemporary Legends in Emergence’, Western Folklore 49: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan (1992) Manufacturing Tales: Sex and Money in Contemporary Legends. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan, Campion-Vincent, Véronique and Heath, Chip (2005) Rumor Mills: The Social Impact of Rumor and Legend. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan and Turner, Patricia A. (2001) Whispers on the Color Line: Rumor and Race in America. Berkeley: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Glassner, Barry (1999) The Culture of Fear: Why Americans Are Afraid of the Wrong Things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gorphe, François (1927) La Critique du Témoinage. Paris: Donnoz.Google Scholar
Heath, Chip, Bell, Chris and Sternberg, Emily (2001) ‘Emotional Selection in Memes: The Case of Urban Legends’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81(6): 1028–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hösch-Ernst, Lucy (1915) ‘Die Psychologie der Aussage’, Internationale Rundschau 1: 15–33.Google Scholar
Jacobson, David J. (1948) Affairs of Dame Rumor. New York: Rinehart and Company.Google Scholar
Jaeger, Marianne E., Anthony, Susan and Rosnow, Ralph L. (1980) ‘Who Hears What From Whom and With what Effect: A Study of Rumor’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 6(3): 473–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaminer, Wendy (1992) I’m Dysfunctional, You’re Dysfunctional. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Kapferer, Jean-Noël (1989) ‘A Mass Poisoning Rumor in Europe’, Public Opinion Quarterly 53 (winter): 467–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapferer, Jean-Noël (1990) Rumors: Uses, Interpretations, and Images. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Klapp, Orrin (1972) Currents of Unrest: An Introduction to Collective Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Knapp, Robert (1944) ‘A Psychology of Rumor’, Public Opinion Quarterly 8: 22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knopf, Terry Ann (1975) Rumors, Race, and Riots. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Koenig, Fredrick (1985) Rumor in the Marketplace: The Social Psychology of Commercial Hearsay. Dover, MA: Auburn House.Google Scholar
Lacitis, Erik (1999) ‘Shock Absorption: In this Information Age, We’ve Become Blase’, Seattle Times, 7 February.Google Scholar
Malthotra, Naresh K. (1984) ‘Reflections on the Information Overload Paradigm in Consumer Decision Making’, Journal of Consumer Research 10 (March): 436–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Martin (1994) ‘Disney’s Lost and Found: Tales of Missing Children have Happy Endings at Park’, Los Angeles Times, Orange County Edition, 12 June, M3–M3.Google Scholar
Morin, Edgar (1970) Rumor in Orléans. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Neubauer, Hans-Joachim (1999[1998]) The Rumour: A Cultural History, trans. Christian Braun. New York: Free Association.Google Scholar
Nkpa, Nwokocha K. (1975) ‘Rumor Mongering in War Time’, Journal of Social Psychology 96: 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pendleton, Susan C. (1998) ‘Rumor Research Revisited and Expanded’, Language and Communication 18: 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Warren and Gist, Noel P. (1951) ‘Rumor and Public Opinion’, American Journal of Sociology 57: 159–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Marilynn (1973[1970]) ‘When Rumor Raged’, in Rossi, Peter H. (ed.), Ghetto Revolts, 2nd edn, pp. 209–233. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Rosnow, Ralph L. (1991) ‘Inside Rumor: A Personal Journey’, American Psychologist 46(5): 484–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosnow, Ralph L. and Fine, Gary Alan (1976) Rumor and Gossip: The Social Psychology of Hearsay. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Samon, Katherine Anne (1993) ‘The 8 Most Incredible Stories You’ve Ever Heard’, McCall’s, September, p. 120–120 +.Google Scholar
Shenk, David (1997) Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut. San Francisco, CA: HarperEdge.Google Scholar
Shibutani, Tamotsu (1966) Improvised News: A Sociological Study of Rumor. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Smith, Katherine S. (2000) ‘These Urban Myths Need Good Dose of Skepticism’, St. Petersburg (FL) Times, 9 April, NT16–NT16.Google Scholar
Suczek, Barbara (1972) ‘The Curious Case of the “Death” of Paul McCartney’, Urban Life and Culture 1: 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Mark (1959) ‘Television is Ruining Our Folktales’, Library Journal, 16 December.Google Scholar
Turner, Patricia A. (1993) I Heard It Through The Grapevine: Rumor in African-American Culture. Berkeley: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Roretz, Karl (1915) ‘Zur Psychologie des Gerüchtes’, Österreichische Rundschau 44: 205–212.Google Scholar