No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A failure of imagination: Competing narratives of 9/11 truth
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2024
Abstract
This essay describes the emergence of the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon as an object of conspiratorial intrigue and imagination, offering a snapshot of the “9/11 truth movement” and its various theories as they began to reach full bloom. Theories about the attacks have come to constitute the dominant conspiratorial present – a present that looks remarkably like the mid- and late-twentieth-century past, despite significant changes in information technology and the continuing institutionalization and ironization of conspiracy theory as an influential form of popular politics. In addition to the 9/11 conspiracy community, the essay considers the battle over the 9/11 Commission's review of the government's failure to anticipate the terrorist attacks. The Commission engaged in knowing and savvy efforts to respond to conspiracy theories and to preempt popular belief in them, offering an authoritative narrative (or, more precisely, set of narratives) to explain what occurred. Meanwhile, the 9/11 truth movement made equally knowing and savvy efforts to critique the official account, responding with its own efforts to reinterpret and re-narrate the attacks, their causes, and what they signify about the contemporary world. While the 9/11 Commission may have criticized the federal government and its intelligence services for their failures of imagination prior to the attacks, the truth movement criticized the Commission either for a failure of imagination – an explanation for the attacks that could see through the “official” account – or for a quite imaginative cover-up of the hidden truths of 9/11. By considering the clash between official authorities and an active conspiracy community, this essay considers how the movement attempted to form a collective political and scholarly community, producing a blizzard of texts offering narratives that compete with the ones told by the Commission that seek the impossible grail of conspiracy theory: the truth. The essay also considers the effects, if any, of the state's attempt to preempt and respond to conspiracy theories.
- Type
- Conspiracy Theories in the United States
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © ICPHS 2020
References
Birchall, C (2006) Knowledge Goes Pop: From Conspiracy Theory to Gossip. Oxford: Berg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenster, M (2008a) Conspiracy Theories: Secrecy and Power in American Culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Fenster, M (2008b) Designing transparency: The 9/11 Commission and institutional form, Washington and Lee Law Review, 65:1239–1321, http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/44.Google Scholar
Fenster, M (2013) Against the cure. In: Butter, M, Reinkowski, M (eds) Conspiracy Theories in the United States and the Middle East: A Comparative Approach. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 333–344.Google Scholar
Fetzer, J (2007) Thinking about “Conspiracy Theories”: 9/11 and JFK. In: J Fetzer (ed.) The 9/11 Conspiracy: The Scamming of America. Peru, IL: Catsfeet Press, pp. 43–74.Google Scholar
Goldberg, RA (2001) Enemies Within: The Culture of Conspiracy in Modern America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, DG (2005) The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions. Northampton, MA: Olive Branch Press.Google Scholar
Kean, TH, Hamilton, LH (2006) Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Melley, T (1999) Empire of Conspiracy: The Culture of Paranoia in Postwar America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Morello, C (2004) Conspiracy Theories Flourish on the Internet, Washington Post, October 7.Google Scholar
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (2004) The 9/11 Commission Report. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Olmsted, KS (2009) Real Enemies: Conspiracy Theories and American Democracy, World War I to 9/11. New York: OUP.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press (2004) 9/11 Commission Has Bipartisan Report, July 20, http://people-press.org/2004/07/20/911-commission-has-bipartisan-support.Google Scholar
Ridgeway, J (2005) The 5 Unanswered Questions About 9/11. New York: Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
Ruppert, MC (2004) Crossing the Rubicon. Gabriola Island, British Columbia: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
Scott, PD (2007) The JFK assassination and 9/11. In: J. Fetzer (ed.) The 9/11 Conspiracy: The Scamming of America. Peru, IL: Catsfeet Press, pp. 195–220.Google Scholar
Shenon, P (2008) The Commission: The Uncensored History of the 9/11 Commission. New York: Twelve.Google Scholar
Sunstein, CR, Vermeule, A (2009) Conspiracy theories: causes and cures, Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(2): 202–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar