Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-30T19:06:26.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The image of the megalopolis – understanding the complex visual construction of Mexico City

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Peter Krieger
Peter Krieger*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas, UNAM, México
*
Peter Krieger, Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas, UNAM, Circuito Mario de la Cueva, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 México, D.F., México Email: krieger@servidor.unam.mx
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The image of the city has always been an important source and tool for defining cultural communities that dwell within. Distinctive street patterns as well as the building scenographies in different cultures and periods document the technological, economic, and cultural capacities of the cities’ inhabitants. From Aristotle’s practical philosophy up to the current tourist view of the city, where the relics of the past – cathedrals, castles, or town halls – serve as symbolic attractors, the heterogeneous image of the city reveals interesting insights into the history of civilization. Beyond the abstract data used in economic or social sciences research – numbers of inhabitants, income, productivity, and other statistical information – the image (and also the imaginaries) of the city with its high cultural complexity is a topic of research for critical art history which offers unexpected and refreshing material for a transdisciplinary dialogue on the city as the most essential form of human culture. Since the beginning of the 21 st century, the city form and image have changed considerably, in quantitative and qualitative terms. The increasing number and size of the world’s megalopolises (cities with more than 10 millions inhabitants), mainly in Latin America, Asia, and Africa, marks a new epoch of city culture with different structural and aesthetic parameters than those of traditional Old European cities.

This article reviews, first, the new visual constructions of the megalopolis, second, its transformation into artistic and documentary images (photograph, film, digital art, etc.), and third, how they are catalysed into collective mental imaginaries. As an example, I examine Mexico City, a megalopolis of about 20 million inhabitants where cultural fragments of the prehispanic past, the colonial period, and the modern epoch have left their visual traces, to constitute a vital collage; one that has many contrasts as well as the occasional clash in cross-cultural processes. Supported by the recent tendencies of Bildwissenschaft (visual studies), this article tries to develop new perspectives of research on the critical phenomena at the beginning 21 st century from within the current polycentric and hyperurbanized world.

Type
Articles
Information
Diogenes , Volume 58 , Issue 3: Cross-Cultural Art History in a Polycentered World , August 2011 , pp. 55 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angélil, Marc, Anna, Klingmann (1999) ‘Hybride Morphologien. Infrastruktur, Architektur, Landschaft,’ Daidalos, 73: 16–25.Google Scholar
Álvarez, Ana, Valentina, Rojas Loa, von Wissel, Christian, eds (2006) Citámbulos. Guia de asombros. El transcurrir de lo insólito/Citambler. Guide to the Marvels of Mexico City. The Incidence of the Remarkable. Mexico: Oceano.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter (1983) Das Passagenwerk. Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Bredekamp, Horst (1998) ‘Die Kunst der Paradoxie,’ Rechtshistorisches Journal, 17: 415–421.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, Albert Erich (1911) Deutsche Stadtbaukunst in der Vergangenheit. Frankfurt-am-Main: Keller.Google Scholar
Burdett, Ricky, Deyan, Sudjic, eds (2007) The Endless City. London: Phaidon.Google Scholar
Careri, Francesco (2002) Walkscapes. El andar cómo práctica estética. Walking as an Æsthetic Practice. Barcelona-Mexico: Gustavo Gili.Google Scholar
Christians, Heiko (2000) ‘Gesicht, Gestalt, Ornament. Überlegungen zum epistemologischen Ort der Physiognomik zwischen Hermeneutik und Mediengeschichte,’ Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte, 74(1): 84–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Mike (2006) Planet of Slums. New York: Verso.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decaen (1972) México y sus alrededores. Colección de monumentos, trajes y paisajes. [Mexico, 1855–1856] Mexico: Editorial del Valle de México.Google Scholar
von Foerster, Heinz (2001) Short Cuts. Frankfurt-am-Main: Zweitausendeins.Google Scholar
Fomento Cultural Banamex (1993) Pasado y Presente del Centro historico. Mexico: Banamex.Google Scholar
Gandy, Matthew (2004) ‘Lagos trotz Koolhaas,’ Stadtbauwelt, 164 (Bauwelt, 48): 20–31.Google Scholar
Hagen, Wolfgang (2002) ‘Die Entropie der Fotografie. Skizzen zu einer Genealogie der digital-elektronischen Bildaufzeichnung,’ in Paradigma Fotografie. Fotokritik am Ende des fotografischen Zeitalters, t. 1, pp 195–235. Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Humpert, Klaus, Brenner, Klaus, Becker, Sibylle, eds (2002) Fundamental Principles of Urban Growth. Wuppertal: Müller und Busmann.Google Scholar
Kirk, Terry (2008) ‘Monströse Monumentalität – Monumentale Monstrositäten,’ Stadtbauwelt, 180 (Bauwelt, 48): 14–24.Google Scholar
Koolhaas, Rem, et al. (2001) Mutations. Bordeaux: Arc en rêve centre d’architecture.Google Scholar
Krieger, Peter (2000) ‘Words Don’t Come Easy – Comentarios a la crítica y exposición de las artes plásticas actuales,’ Universidad de México, 597–598: 25–29.Google Scholar
Krieger, Peter (2004) ‘Construcción visual de la megalópolis México,’ in Benítez, Issa (ed.) Hacia otra historia del arte en México. Disolvencias (1960–2000), pp 111–139. Mexico: conaculta.Google Scholar
Krieger, Peter, ed (2006) Megalópolis – Modernización de la Ciudad de México en el siglo xx. Mexico: UNAM.Google Scholar
Krieger, Peter (2007) ‘Des-Orientierungen. Raumbilder von Mexico-Stadt,’ in Hendrich, H J (ed.) Raum, anschaulich. Zur Phänomenologie des architektonischen Raumes, pp 129–151. Gumpoldskirchen: [-de’A-] Verlag.Google Scholar
Krieger, Peter (2009) ‘Aesthetics and Anthropology of Megacities – a New Field of Art Historical Research,’ in Dufrêne, Th (ed.) Cannibalisme disciplinaire: Histoire de l’art et anthropologie, pp 197–211. Paris: inha/Musée du Quai Branly. See also the review in Life, December 1965, pp. 92 and 96.Google Scholar
Linsley, Robert (2002) ‘Minimalism and the City. Robert Smithson as a Social Critic,’ RES. Anthropology and Æsthetics, 41: 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1997) Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, Benoît (1987) The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Boston, Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
Medina, Cuauhtémoc (2002) Twenty Millions Mexicans Can’t be Wrong. London: South London Gallery.Google Scholar
Medina, Cuauhtémoc (2009) Teresa Margolles. What else can we talk about? Mexico: Editorial RM.Google Scholar
Mönninger, Michael (1993) ‘Schönheit aus Irrtum. Versuch, das Chaos der Städte zu verstehen,’ Kursbuch, 112 (‘Städte bauen’): 128–134.Google Scholar
Resina, Joan Ramón, Ingenschay, Dieter, eds (2003) After-Images of the City. Ithaca: Cornell UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieger, Stefan (2003) Kybernetische Anthropologie. Eine Geschichte der Virtualität. Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Rowe, Colin, Koetter, Fred (1978) Collage City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Smithson, Robert (1979) ‘The Crystal Land,’ in Holt, N. (ed.) The Writings of Robert Smithson. New York: New York UP.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1999) Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Tagebücher 1914–1916. Philosophische Untersuchungen (Werkausgabe Band I). Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar