No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Local Powers and Judicial Constraints in a Case of Rape in India
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2024
Abstract
Since independence, the Indian State has shown a voluntarist approach in the judicial domain. This has led to the introduction of severe laws against customary relations of exploitation, harassment, and discrimination that rest on caste, gender, or religious differences. While this policy has enhanced a deeper legal culture, and provoked a new legal activism within the Indian population, it has not extirpated the local relations of dominance and exploitation. This paper provides an ethnographic account of how the rape of a young girl from a lower caste in Himachal Pradesh (Northern India) was dealt with in the judicial domain. It will thus provide an analysis of the interplay between traditional power relations and new forces that oppose those power relations through the rule of law. It will show how this interplay is visible in trial, and how it interferes with criminal procedures followed by the court.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Diogenes , Volume 60 , Issue 3-4: The Boundaries of Law. Justice, Powers, and Politics , November 2013 , pp. 97 - 115
- Copyright
- Copyright © ICPHS 2015
References
Anderson, MR (1990) Classifications and coercions: themes in South Asian legal studies in the 1980s. South Asia Research 10(2): 158–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxi, U (2003) The colonialist heritage. In Munday, PL, Munday, R (eds), Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.46–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berti, D (2010) Hostile witnesses, judicial interactions and out-of-court narratives in a North Indian district court. Contributions to Indian Sociology 44(3): 235–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berti, D (2011a) Trials, witnesses and local stakes in a district court of Himachal Pradesh (North India). In Pfaff, J, Toffin, G (eds) Citizenship, Democracy, and Belonging in the Himalayas,. New Delhi: Sage, pp.290–313.Google Scholar
Berti, D (2011b) Courts of law and legal practice. In Clark-Deces, I (ed) A Companion to the Anthropology of India. Oxford: Blackwell, pp.355–370.Google Scholar
Brown, M (2003) Ethnology and colonial administration in nineteenth-century British India: the question of native crime and criminality. British Journal for the History of Science 36(2): 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, BS (1959) Some notes on law and change in North India. Economic Development and Cultural Change 8(1): 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, BS (1965) Anthropological notes on disputes and law in India. American Anthropologist, 67(6) The Ethnography of Law: 82–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M, Croall, H, Tyrer, J (1995) Criminal Justice: An Introduction to the Criminal Justice System in England and Wales. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Eckert, J (2006) From subjects to citizens: legalism from below and the homogenisation of the legal sphere. Journal of Legal Pluralism 53–54: 45–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, ML (1992) The aborted restoration of ‘indigenous’ law in India. In Galanter ML, Law and Society in Modern India (introduction by R Dhavan). Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp.37–53.Google Scholar
Guha, R (1989) Dominance without hegemony and its historiography. Subaltern Studies vi: Writings on South Asian History and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.210–309.Google Scholar
Hayden, R (1984) A note on caste panchâyats and government courts in India: different kinds of stages for different kinds of performances. Journal of Legal Pluralism 22: 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolsky, E (2005) Codification and the rule of colonial difference: criminal procedure in British India. Law and History Review 23(3): 631–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, HS (1993) A new look at actor-oriented theory. PoLAR (Political and Legal Anthropology Review) 16(3): 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludden, D (ed) (2001) Reading Subaltern Studies: Critical History, Contested Meaning, and the Globalisation of South Asia. New Delhi: Permanent Black.Google Scholar
Merry, SE (2003) Rights talk and the experience of law: implementing women's human rights to protection from violence. Human Rights Quarterly 25(2): 343–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, EP (1993) Gender, power, and legal pluralism: Rajasthan, India. American Ethnologist 20(3): 522–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H (1994) The problem of explaining violence in the social sciences. In Harvey, P, Gow, P (eds) Sex and Violence: Issues in Representation and Experience. London: Routledge, pp.522–542.Google Scholar
Rao, N (2007) Custom and the courts: ensuring women's rights to land, Jharkhand, India. Development and Change 38(2): 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roussel, G (2005) Les procès-verbaux d’interrogatoire : Rédaction et exploitation. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Sivaramakrishnan, K (2008) Some intellectual genealogies for the concept of everyday resistance. American Anthropologist 107(3): 346–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivas, MN (1962) Caste in Modern India, and Other Essays. Mumbai: Asia Publishing House.Google Scholar
Stein, B (1980) Peasant, State and Society in Medieval India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wardhaugh, J (2005) The jungle and the village: discourses on crime and deviance in rural North India. South Asia Research 25(2): 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar