Skip to main content Accessibility help

Developing National Standards for Public Health Emergency Preparedness With a Limited Evidence Base

  • Christopher Nelson, Ed Chan, Anita Chandra, Paul Sorensen, Henry H. Willis, Stephanie Dulin and Kristin Leuschner...


Objective: The paucity of evidence and wide variation among communities creates challenges for developing congressionally mandated national performance standards for public health preparedness. Using countermeasure dispensing as an example, we present an approach for developing standards that balances national uniformity and local flexibility, consistent with the quality of evidence available.

Methods: We used multiple methods, including a survey of community practices, mathematical modeling, and expert panel discussion.

Results: The article presents recommended dispensing standards, along with a general framework that can be used to analyze tradeoffs involved in developing other preparedness standards.

Conclusions: Standards can be developed using existing evidence, but would be helped immensely by a stronger evidence base.

(Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2010;4:285-290)


Corresponding author

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Christopher Nelson, RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 (e-mail:


Hide All
1.Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act. Pub L No. 101 et seq. 2006:109-417.
2.Program Announcement AA154 FY 2008. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2009.
3.Campbell, M, Fitzpatrick, R, Kinmouth, AL, Sandercock, P, Spiegelhalter, D, Tyrer, P.Education and debate: framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve public health. BMJ. 2000;321:694696.
4.Lenaway, D, Halverson, P, Sotnikov, S, Tilson, H, Corso, L, Millington, W.Public health systems research: setting a national agenda. Am J Public Health. 2006;96 (3):410413.
5.National Fire Protection Association. Performance-based primer: Codes & standards preparation. Quincy, MA: NFPA; January 21, 2000. Accessed October 22, 2010.
6.Canada, B.Homeland Security: Standards for State and Local Preparedness. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service; 2003.
7.American National Standards Institute. Overview of the US standardization system: voluntary consensus standards and conformity assessment activities. Published 2007. Accessed September 29, 2010.
8.American National Standards Institute. Essential requirements: due process requirements for American national standards.,%20Guides,%20and%20Forms/2010%20ANSI%20Essential%20Requirements%20and%20Related/2010%20ANSI%20Essential%20Requirements.pdf. Published 2008. Accessed September 29, 2010.
9.Lehr, W.Understanding the process. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1992;43:550555.
10.Cizek, G, Bunch, M, Koons, H.Setting performance standards: contemporary methods. Educ Meas Issues Pract. 2004;Winter:31-50.
11.Nelson, C, Chan, E, Chandra, A, et alRecommended infrastructure standards for mass antibiotic dispensing. Published 2008. Accessed September 29, 2010.
12.US Congress Office of Technology Assessment. Preventing illness and injury in the workplace. Published 1985. Accessed September 29, 2010.
13.Wilkening, DA.Sverdlovsk revisited: modeling human inhalation anthrax. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103 (20):75897594.
14.Wein, LM, Craft, DL, Kaplan, EH.Emergency response to an anthrax attack. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100 (7):43464351.
15.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Point of dispensing (POD) standards. Published 2008. Accessed October 22, 2010.
16.Coglianese, C, Nash, J, Olmsted, T.Performed-based regulation: prospects and limitations in health, safety and environmental protection. Adm Law Rev. 2003;55:705730.
17.Nelson, C, Beckjord, E, Dausey, D, et alHow can we strengthen the evidence base for public health emergency preparedness. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2:14.
18.Moore, M, Chan, E, Lurie, N, et alImproving Global Influenza Surveillance: Strategies for the U.S. Government. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2007.
19.Fowler, RA, Sanders, GD, Bravata, DM, et alCost-effectiveness of defending against bioterrorism: a comparison of vaccination and antibiotic prophylaxis against anthrax. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142 (8):601610.
20.Kaplan, EH, Craft, DL, Wein, LM.Emergency response to a smallpox attack: the case for mass vaccination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99 (16):1093510940.
21.Bozzette, SA, Boer, R, Bhatnagar, V, et alA model for a smallpox-vaccination policy. N Engl J Med. 2003;348 (5):416425.
22.Rendin, RW, Welch, NM, Kaplowitz, LG.Leveraging bioterrorism preparedness for non-bioterrorism events: a public health example. Biosecur Bioterror. 2005;3 (4):309315.
23.Stoto, M, Dausey, D, Davis, L, et alLearning From Experience: The Public Health Response to West Nile Virus, SARS, Monkeypox, and Hepatitis A Outbreaks in the United States. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2005.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
  • ISSN: 1935-7893
  • EISSN: 1938-744X
  • URL: /core/journals/disaster-medicine-and-public-health-preparedness
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed