Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Ethics and Floods: A Systematic Review

  • Veselin L. Mitrović (a1), Dónal P. O’Mathúna (a2) and Iskra A. Nola (a3)
  • Please note a correction has been issued for this article.
Abstract

Disaster ethics is a developing field of inquiry recognizing the wide variety of ethical issues confronting various professionals involved in planning for and responding to different types of disasters. This article explores how ethical issues related to floods are addressed in academic literature. The review involved analysis of publications on ethics and floods identified in a systematic literature search of electronic databases that included sociological, biomedical, and geophysical sources. The review methods were guided by the PRISMA Statement on systematic reviews, adapted to this topic area, and followed by a qualitative analysis of the included publications. All articles were analyzed using NVivo software version 11. The qualitative analysis showed that further research is needed on the ethical issues involved in flood disasters. Ethical guidelines are needed for flood planners and responders that are based on the consistent application of well-established ethical principles, values, and virtues to the specific circumstances arising with each flood. Flexibility is required in applying such approaches. The results suggest that interdisciplinary collaboration (sociological, biomedical, geophysical, engineering, and ethical) could contribute significantly to the development of ethics in floods. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2018;page 1 of 12)

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Ethics and Floods: A Systematic Review
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Ethics and Floods: A Systematic Review
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Ethics and Floods: A Systematic Review
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Corresponding author
Correspondence and reprint requests to Iskra A. Nola, University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Andrija Stampar School of Public Health, Rockefeller Street 4, Zagreb, Croatia (e-mail: ianola@snz.hr)
References
Hide All
1. Frodeman, R, Klein, JT, Mitcham, C, Tuana, N. Introduction: new directions/cities and rivers: interdisciplinary studies in knowledge production. Nat Cult, 2007;2(2):176187.
2. O’Mathúna, DP, Gordijn, B, Clarke, M, eds. Disaster Bioeth, Dordrecht: Springer; 2014.
3. Karadag, CO, Hakan, AK. Ethical dilemmas in disaster medicine. Iran Red Crescent Med J, 2012;14(10):602612.
4. Zack, N. The ethics of disaster planning: preparation vs response. Philos Manag, 2009;8(2):5566.
5. Moatty, A. Post-flood recovery: an opportunity for disaster risk reduction? In: Vinet F, ed. Floods. Volume 2 – Risk Management. London: ISTE Press and Elsevier; 2017:349363.
6. Neslen, A. Flood disasters more than double across Europe in 35 years. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jan/19/flood-disasters-more-than-double-across-europe-in-35-years. Published January 19, 2017. Accessed June 1, 2018.
7. Wallemacq, P. Natural disasters in 2017: lower mortality, higher cost. Cred Crunch 50:1-2. https://www.cred.be/publications. Published March 31, 2018. Accessed June 1, 2018.
8. Macpherson, CC, Akpinar-Elci, M. Caribbean heat threatens health, well-being and the future of humanity. Public Health Ethics, 2015;8(2):196208.
9. Moatty, A, Vinet, F. Post-disaster recovery: the challenge of anticipation. E3S Web Conf, 2016;7:17003.
10. Mariaselvam, S, Gopichandran, V. The Chennai floods of 2015: urgent need for ethical disaster management guidelines. Ind J Med Ethics, 2016;1(2):9195.
11. Alderman, K, Turner, LR, Tong, S. Floods and human health: a systematic review. Environ Int, 2012;47:3747.
12. Zack, N. Ethics for Disaster. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2009.
13. Simpson, AV, Cunha, MP, Clegg, S. Hybridity, sociomateriality and compassion: what happens when a river floods and a city’s organizations respond? Scand J Manag, 2015;31:375386.
14. Rich, TP. Lessons in social responsibility from the Austin Dam failure. Int J Eng Edu, 2006;22(6):12871296.
15. Hvistendahl, M. China’s three gorges dam: an environmental catastrophe? Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/chinas-three-gorges-dam-disaster. Published March 25, 2008. Accessed June 1, 2018.
16. Chacowry, A. Public perceptions of living with flood risk from media coverage in the small island developing state of Mauritius. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct, 2016;19:303310.
17. Morss, RE, Wahl, E. An ethical analysis of hydrometeorological prediction and decision making: the case of the 1997 Red River flood. Environ Haz, 2007;7:342352.
18. Rossano, F. From absolute protection to controlled disaster: new perspectives on flood management in times of climate change. J Landsc Archit, 2015;10(1):1625.
19. Newberry, B. Katrina: macro-ethical issues for engineers. Sci Eng Ethics, 2010;16:535571.
20. Jurkiewicz, CL. Political leadership, cultural ethics and recovery: Louisiana post-Katrina. Public Organ Rev, 2009;9:353366.
21. Mitrović, VL. Resilience: detecting vulnerability in marginal groups. Disaster Prev Manag, 2015;24(2):185200.
22. Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, Altman, DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(6):e1000097.
23. Srinivasan, S. After the floods: health services’ responsibilities in a crisis. Ind J Med Ethics. 2005;2(4):108109.
24. Keays, JF. The ethical position of the engineering profession. In: January 1974 floods, Moreton region: Proceedings of Symposium. Australia: Institute of Engineers; 1974:272273.
25. Gaitonde, R, Gopichandran, V. The Chennai floods of 2015 and the health system response. Ind J Med Ethics, 2016;1(2):7175.
26. Jurkiewicz, CL. Louisiana’s ethical culture and its effect on the administrative failures following Katrina. Public Admin Rev, 2007;67:5763.
27. Ewart, J, McLean, H. Ducking for cover in the “blame game”: news framing of the findings of two reports into the 2010–11 Queensland floods. Disasters. 2015;39(1):166184.
28. Rizza, C, Pereira, ÂG. Building a resilient community through social network: ethical considerations about the 2011 Genoa floods. In: Hiltz SR, Pfaff MS, Plotnick L, Shih PC, eds. Proceedings of the 11th International ISCRAM. 2014:289293.
29. Johnston, D. An examination of the principles-based ethics by which Red Cross personnel evaluate private donor suitability. In: Beard M, Lynch S, eds. Conscience, Leadership and the Problem of “Dirty Hands.” Res Ethics Iss Organ. Bingley, UK: Emerald; 2015;13:119137.
30. de Groot, M. Exploring the relationship between public environmental ethics and river flood policies in western Europe. J Environ Manag, 2012;93(1):19.
31. Lane, SN. Ethical risk management, but without risk communication? In: Kearnes M, Klauser F, Lane S. Critical Risk Research: Practices, Politics and Ethics. Oxford, UK: Wiley; 2012:151172.
32. Parkash, S. Ethics in disaster management. Ann Geophys, 2012;55(3):383387.
33. Malik, AM. Denial of flood aid to members of the Ahmadiyya Muslim community in Pakistan. Health Hum Rights. 2011;13(1):6269.
34. Holt, WG. Do you know what it means to rebuild New Orleans? Cultural sustainability after disaster. In: Holt WG, ed. Research in Urban Sociology. From Sustainable to Resilient Cities: Global Concerns and Urban Efforts. UK: Emerald; 2014;14:267287.
35. Li, R, Van Beek, E, Gijsberg, P. Integrated water resources management for the Yellow River in China: a discussion of scientific and ethical approaches. The Basis of civilization – water science? (Proceedings of the UNESCO/IAIIS/IWTIA symposium held in Rome. December 2003). IAHS. 2004;286:150-159.
36. Glantz, M, Jamieson, D. Societal response to Hurricane Mitch and intra- versus intergenerational equity issues: whose norms should apply? Risk Anal, 2000;20(6):869882.
37. Hugo, G. Environmental concerns and international migration. Int Migr Rev. 1996;30(1):105131.
38. Fahey, CJ. Ethics and disasters: mapping the moral territory. Generation. 2007:6165.
39. Wildes, KW. An ethicist’s perspective. Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/An-Ethicists-Perspective/5867. Published April 21, 2006. Accessed June 1, 2018.
40. Daniel, DE. A perspective on the levee failures in New Orleans from Hurricane Katrina. Geotech Spec Publ, 2014;233:271282.
41. Dennis, MR, Kunkel, AD, Woods, G, Schrodt, P. Making sense of New Orleans flood trauma recovery: ethics, research design, and policy considerations for future disasters. Anal Soc Iss Public Policy, 2006;6(1):191213.
42. Zegwaard, A, Petersen, AC, Wester, P. Climate change and ontological politics in the Dutch Delta. Clim Change, 2015;132:433444.
43. Clark, MJ. Putting water in its place: a perspective on GIS in hydrology and water management. Hydrol Process, 1998;12:823834.
44. Breo, DL. Flood, sweat, and tears – trying to build “emotional levees.” J Am Med Assoc, 1993;270(23):28602862.
45. Takahashi, T. Ethics of natural disasters: Tanaka Shozo and the Ashio Mine poisoning. Tamkang Rev, 2006;37(1):159169
46. Simonovic, SP. Two new floods, climate change, and ethics. J Flood Risk Manag, 2011;4:141142.
47. Botez, C. Liquefactions: river floods and tides of memory in Anne Michaels’ Fugitive Pieces. Soc Altern, 2014;33(2):2331.
48. Tsu, TYH. Making virtues of disaster: “Beautiful Tales” from the Kobe Flood of 1938. Asian Stud Rev, 2008;32(2):197214.
49. Bergstrom, S. Principles and confidence in hydrological modelling. Hydro Res, 1991;22:123136.
50. Mezinska, S, Kakuk, P, Mijaljica, G, et al. Research in disaster settings: a systematic qualitative review of ethical guidelines. BMC Med Ethics, 2016;17(1):111.
51. Zack, N. Violence, poverty, and disaster: New Orleans, Haiti, and Chile. Radic Philos Rev, 2012;15(1):5365.
52. Lewis, J. Some realities of resilience: an updated case study of storms and flooding at Chiswell, Dorset. Disaster Prev Manag, 2013;22(4):300311.
53. Barton, AH. Disaster and collective stress. In: Perry RW, Quarantelli EL, eds. What Is a Disaster? New Answers to Old Questions. USA: International Research Committee on Disasters; 2005:125153.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
  • ISSN: 1935-7893
  • EISSN: 1938-744X
  • URL: /core/journals/disaster-medicine-and-public-health-preparedness
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

A correction has been issued for this article: