Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T19:53:56.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Innovative Methods for the Benefit of Public Health Using Space Technologies for Disaster Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2015

Petros C. Dinas ,
Christian Mueller ,
Nathan Clark ,
Tim Elgin ,
S. Ali Nasseri ,
Etai Yaffe ,
Scott Madry ,
Jonathan B. Clark  and
Farhan Asrar
Petros C. Dinas*
Affiliation:
International Space University, Space Studies Program 2014, Montreal, Canada, and Strasbourg, France Institute of Sport, Faculty of Education Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Walsall, United Kingdom, and FAME Lab, School of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Thessaly, Karies, Trikala, Greece
Christian Mueller
Affiliation:
International Space University, Space Studies Program 2014, Montreal, Canada, and Strasbourg, France Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Bavaria, Germany
Nathan Clark
Affiliation:
International Space University, Space Studies Program 2014, Montreal, Canada, and Strasbourg, France
Tim Elgin
Affiliation:
International Space University, Space Studies Program 2014, Montreal, Canada, and Strasbourg, France
S. Ali Nasseri
Affiliation:
International Space University, Space Studies Program 2014, Montreal, Canada, and Strasbourg, France
Etai Yaffe
Affiliation:
International Space University, Space Studies Program 2014, Montreal, Canada, and Strasbourg, France
Scott Madry
Affiliation:
International Space University, Space Studies Program 2014, Montreal, Canada, and Strasbourg, France Research Laboratories of Archaeology, UNC-CH, Informatics International, Inc, Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina
Jonathan B. Clark
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
Farhan Asrar
Affiliation:
International Space University, Space Studies Program 2014, Montreal, Canada, and Strasbourg, France University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Mr Dinas, Mr Mueller, Mr Clark, Mr Elgin, Mr Nasseri, and Dr Yaffe shared first authorship.
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Petros C. Dinas, Institute of Sport, Faculty of Education Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Gorway Road, Walsall, West Midlands, WS1 3BD, UK (e-mail: petros.cd@gmail.com).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Space applications have evolved to play a significant role in disaster relief by providing services including remote sensing imagery for mitigation and disaster damage assessments; satellite communication to provide access to medical services; positioning, navigation, and timing services; and data sharing. Common issues identified in past disaster response and relief efforts include lack of communication, delayed ordering of actions (eg, evacuations), and low levels of preparedness by authorities during and after disasters. We briefly summarize the Space for Health (S4H) Team Project, which was prepared during the Space Studies Program 2014 within the International Space University. The S4H Project aimed to improve the way space assets and experiences are used in support of public health during disaster relief efforts. We recommend an integrated solution based on nano-satellites or a balloon communication system, mobile self-contained relief units, portable medical scanning devices, and micro-unmanned vehicles that could revolutionize disaster relief and disrupt different markets. The recommended new system of coordination and communication using space assets to support public health during disaster relief efforts is feasible. Nevertheless, further actions should be taken by governments and organizations in collaboration with the private sector to design, test, and implement this system. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2015;9:319-328)

Keywords

disastersdisaster planningemergency preparedness
Type
Concepts in Disaster Medicine
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , June 2015 , pp. 319 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Public Health. World Health Organization website: Trade, foreign policy, diplomacy and health. http://www.who.int/trade/glossary/story076/en/. Accessed March 23, 2015.Google Scholar
2. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs. The Space Millennium: Vienna Declaration on Space and Human Development. Third United Nations Conference on the Exploration and Peaceful Uses of Outer Space. Vienna, Austria: UN OOSA; 1999:5.Google Scholar
3. Kaushal, A, Johnson, CP. Disease surveillance using GIS and remote sensing. Indo-French Workshop on Tele-Epidemiology of Dengue. Pune, India: Centre for Development of Advanced Computing; 2003:2.Google Scholar
4. Chopra, A. How GPS is being used to fight the asthma epidemic. New Republic. http://www.newrepublic.com/article/117085/innovative-state-aneesh-chopra-excerpt-asthma-and-gps. Published April 16, 2014. Accessed March 23, 2015.Google Scholar
5. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Technical Paper: Space Applications for Improving Disaster Management. Bangkok, Thailand: United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, Space Applications Section, Information and Communications Technology and Disaster Risk Reduction Division, ESCAP with assistance from Mr. Syed T. Ahmed, Associate Economic Affairs Officer; 2013.Google Scholar
6. Kuyumjian, RB. CSA Visiting Lecture: Telemedicine in Space and on Earth. International Space University SSP2014; 2014; Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
7. Dulchavsky, SA. Advanced ultrasound for the space program and on Earth. NASA website. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/benefits/ultrasound.html#.VRCE__nF8g0. Published February 29, 2012. Accessed March 23, 2015.Google Scholar
8. Szalai, B, Detsis, E, Peeters, W. ESA space spin-offs benefits for the health sector. Acta Astronautica. 2012;80:1-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Varacallo, MA, Fox, EJ. Osteoporosis and its complications. Med Clin North Am. 2014;98:817-831.Google Scholar
10. Sibonga, JD. Spaceflight-induced bone loss: is there an osteoporosis risk? Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2013;11:92-98.Google Scholar
11. Bannon, V, Andrade, D, Abai, J, et al. Legal Issues from the International Response to the Tsunami in Indonesia. Bangkok, Thailand: International Federation of Red Cross and RedCrescent Societies (IFRC); 2006:6-7.Google Scholar
12. US House of Representatives. A Failure of Initiative. Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2006:16-20.Google Scholar
13. Disaster Risk in West Africa. DARA website. http://daraint.org/risk-reduction-index/west-africa/disaster-risk-in-west-africa/. Published 2011. Accessed March 23, 2015.Google Scholar
14. World Bank Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR). Building Resilience: Integrating Climate and Disaster Risk Into Development. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank; 2013:1-44.Google Scholar
15. Christensen, CM, Raynor, ME. The Innovator’s Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 2003.Google Scholar
16. Christensen, CM. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Perseus Distribution Services; 1997.Google Scholar
17. Eggers, W, Baker, L, Gonzalez, R, Vaughn, A. Public sector, disrupted: how disruptive innovation can help government achieve more for less. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Public-Sector/dttl-ps-publicsectordisrupted-08082013.pdf. Published 2012. Accessed March 23, 2015.Google Scholar
18. Dombrowski, P, Gholz, E. Identifying Disruptive Innovation;Innovation Theory and the Defense Industry. Innovations. 2009;4:101-117.Google Scholar
19. Kameche, M, Benzeniar, H, Benbouzid, AB, et al. Disaster monitoring constellation using nanosatellites. J Aerosp Technol Manag. 2014;6:93-100.Google Scholar
20. Gill, E, Sundaramoorthy, P, Bouwmeester, J, et al. Formation flying within a constellation of nano-satellites: the QB50 mission. Acta Astronautica. 2013;82:110-117.Google Scholar
21. O’Dell, J. The International Space Station can now launch satellites into space. VentureBeat. http://venturebeat.com/2012/12/10/iss-launch-satellites/. Published December 10, 2012. Accessed March 23, 2015.Google Scholar
22. Orbital. Pegasus. Vienna, VA: Orbital Sciences Corporation; 2014.Google Scholar
23. Planet Labs Inc. Flock 1. San Francisco, CA: Planet Labs; 2015.Google Scholar
24. Thoemel, DJ, ed. QB50. An International Network of 50 Double and Triple CubeSats. Belgium; 2015.Google Scholar
25. Nebiker, S, Annen, A, Scherrer, M, Oesch, D. A light-weight multispectral sensor for micro UAV – opportunities for very high resolution airborn remote sensing. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Beijing, China: International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing; 2008.Google Scholar
26. Meier, P. Humanitarians in the sky: using UAVs for disaster response. iRevolutions website. http://irevolution.net/2014/06/25/humanitarians-in-the-sky/. Published June 25, 2014. Accessed March 23, 2015.Google Scholar
27. Werner, D. Drone Swarm: networks of small UAVs offer big capabilities. Defense News. http://archive.defensenews.com/article/20130612/C4ISR/306120029/Drone-Swarm-Networks-Small-UAVs-Offer-Big-Capabilities. Published June 12, 2013. Accessed March 23, 2015.Google Scholar
28. Hauert, S, Leven, S, Zufferey, J-C, et al. Communication-based Leashing of Real Flying Robots. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; May 3-7, 2010; Anchorage, AK.Google Scholar
29. Hauert, S, Leven, S, Zufferey, J-C, et al. The Swarming Micro Air Vehicle Network (SMAVNET) Project. http://lis2.epfl.ch/CompletedResearchProjects/SwarmingMAVs/. Published 2010. Accessed March 23, 2015.Google Scholar
30. Jansen, P. The Tricorder Project. http://www.tricorderproject.org/.Google Scholar
31. Behar, Y. Scanadu. https://www.scanadu.com/.Google Scholar
32. Rowe, A, Cagle, Y. From Star Trek to SCOUT: the story of a real-world medical tricorder. NASA website. http://www.nasa.gov/centers/ames/researchpark/news/partners/2013/scanaduscout.html. Published February 5, 2013. Accessed March 23, 2015.Google Scholar
33. The dream of the medical tricorder. The Economist. Technology Quarterly. December 2012. http://www.economist.com/news/technology-quarterly/21567208-medical-technology-hand-held-diagnostic-devices-seen-star-trek-are-inspiring. Accessed March 23, 2015.Google Scholar
34. Elmasllari, E. Better first response medical care during catastrophes. Research News. December 2013:Topic 6. Sankt Augustin: Fraunhofer; 2013.Google Scholar
35. Takizawa, O. RFID-based Disaster-Relief System. In: Turcu C, ed. Sustainable Radio Frequency Identification Solutions. Croatia: INTECH; 2010:356.Google Scholar
36. Ecos PowerCube®. Stuart, FL: Ecosphere Technologies; 2014.Google Scholar
37. .Namibia benefits from green telecoms using PowerCube fuel cell. Fuel Cells Bulletin. 2012;I:3-4.Google Scholar
38. International Civil Aviation Organization. Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Montréal, Canada: International Civil Aviation Organization; 2011.Google Scholar
39. Drones in Canada. Will the proliferation of domestic drone use in Canada raise new concerns for privacy? Gatineau, Quebec: Office of the Privacy Commissioner Canada; 2013:24. https://www.priv.gc.ca/information/research-recherche/2013/drones_201303_e.asp. Accessed March 24, 2015.Google Scholar
40. Finn, RL, Wright, D. Unmanned aircraft systems: surveillance, ethics and privacy in civil applications. Computer Law Secur Rev. 2012;28:184-194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41. Cheng, M. Medical Devices Regulations. Global Overview and Guiding Principles. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003:55.Google Scholar
42. Poluta, MA. A medical device regulatory framework - case study: South Africa. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;1:5675-5678.Google Scholar
43. Thatte, U, Hussain, S, de Rosas-Valera, M, et al. Evidence-based decision on medical technologies in Asia Pacific: experiences from India, Malaysia, Philippines, and Pakistan. Value Health . 2009;12(suppl 3):S18-S25.Google Scholar
44. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Directive 2007/47/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union. 2007; L 247/21. http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/sectors/medical-devices/files/revision_docs/2007-47-en_en.pdf. Accessed March 24, 2015.Google Scholar
45. International Medical Device Regulators Forums (IMDRF). Website. http://www.imdrf.org/. Accessed March 24, 2015.Google Scholar
46. Altenstetter, C. Medical device regulation and nanotechnologies: determining the role of patient safety concerns in policymaking. Law Policy. 2014;33:29.Google Scholar
47. Cabrera-Alvarado, S, Langston, S, Antoniou, N, et al. The progressive use of satellite technology for disaster management relief: challenges to a legal and policy framework. 64th International Astronautical Congress; September 23, 2013; Beijing, China.Google Scholar
48. Clendaniel, M. A real-life tricorder is now available for you to buy and scan yourself. Fast Company Co.Exist. http://www.fastcoexist.com/1682064/a-real-life-tricorder-is-now-available-for-you-to-buy-and-scan-yourself. Published May 22, 2013. Accessed March 24, 2015.Google Scholar
49. Anthony, S. Rent the world’s 30th-fastest, 30,472-core supercomputer for $1,279 per hour. Extreme Tech. http://www.extremetech.com/computing/96829-rent-the-worlds-30th-fastest-30472-core-supercomputer-for-1279-per-hour. Published September 20, 2011. Accessed March 24, 2015.Google Scholar
50. Kumar, V, Michael, N. Opportunities and challenges with autonomous micro aerial vehicles. Int J Robotics Res. 2012;31:1279-1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51. Sarris, Z. Survey of UAV applications in civil markets. 9th IEEE Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation; 2001; Croatia.Google Scholar
52. Al-tahir, R, Arthur, M, Davis, D. Low cost aerial mapping alternatives for natural disasters in the Caribbean. FIG Working Week 2011; May 18-22, 2011; Marrakech, Morocco.Google Scholar
53. Valerdi, R, Merrill, J, Maloney, P. Cost metrics for unmanned aerial vehicles. AIAA 16th Lighter-Than-Air Systems Technology Conference and Balloon Systems Conference; September 2005; Arlington, VA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54. Valerdi, R. Cost Metrics for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2014.Google Scholar
55. Wezeman, S. UAVs AND UCAVs: Developments in the European Union. Brussels, Belgium: European Union Policy Department; 2007. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2007/381405/EXPO-SEDE_ET(2007)381405_EN.pdf. Accessed March 24, 2015.Google Scholar
56. Ministry of Home Affairs. Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India on Performance Audit of Disaster Preparedness in India. India: Ministry of Home Affairs; 2013:179.Google Scholar
57. Moynihan, DP. The Response to Hurricane Katrina. Geneva, Switzerland: International Risk Governance Council; 2009:1-11.Google Scholar
58. Vanderford, ML, Nastoff, T, Telfer, JL, et al. Emergency communication challenges in response to Hurricane Katrina: lessons from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. J Appl Commun Res. 2007;35:9-25.Google Scholar
59. Kanoria, AA, Pant, RS. Winged aerostat systems for better station keeping for aerial surveillance. IEEE International Conference for Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering; 2011; New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
60. Smith, MS, Perry, WD, Lew, TM. Development of a small stratospheric station keeping balloon system. ISTS. 2000-k-15.Google Scholar