Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Resource Allocation After a Nuclear Detonation Incident: Unaltered Standards of Ethical Decision Making

Abstract
ABSTRACT

This article provides practical ethical guidance for clinicians making decisions after a nuclear detonation, in advance of the full establishment of a coordinated response. We argue that the utilitarian maxim of the greatest good for the greatest number, interpreted only as “the most lives saved,” needs refinement. We take the philosophical position that utilitarian efficiency should be tempered by the principle of fairness in making decisions about providing lifesaving interventions and palliation. The most practical way to achieve these goals is to mirror the ethical precepts of routine clinical practice, in which 3 factors govern resource allocation: order of presentation, patient's medical need, and effectiveness of an intervention. Although these basic ethical standards do not change, priority is given in a crisis to those at highest need in whom interventions are expected to be effective. If available resources will not be effective in meeting the need, then it is unfair to expend them and they should be allocated to another patient with high need and greater expectation for survival if treated. As shortage becomes critical, thresholds for intervention become more stringent. Although the focus of providers will be on the victims of the event, the needs of patients already receiving care before the detonation also must be considered. Those not allocated intervention must still be provided as much appropriate comfort, assistance, relief of symptoms, and explanations as possible, given the available resources. Reassessment of patients' clinical status and priority for intervention also should be conducted with regularity.

(Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2011;5:S46-S53)

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Resource Allocation After a Nuclear Detonation Incident: Unaltered Standards of Ethical Decision Making
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Resource Allocation After a Nuclear Detonation Incident: Unaltered Standards of Ethical Decision Making
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Resource Allocation After a Nuclear Detonation Incident: Unaltered Standards of Ethical Decision Making
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr J. Jaime Caro, United Biosource Corp, 430 Bedford St, Suite 300, Lexington, MA 02420 (e-mail: jaime.caro@mcgill.ca).
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

2. FM Burkle Jr Mass casualty management of a large-scale bioterrorist event: an epidemiological approach that shapes triage decisions. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2002;20 (2):409436.

3. A Devereaux , MD Christian , JR Dichter , JA Geiling , L Rubinson Task Force for Mass Critical Care. Summary of suggestions from the task force for mass critical care summit, January 26-27, 2007. Chest. 2008;133 5(Suppl)1S7S.

5. LO Gostin , JW Sapsin , SP. Teret The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act: planning for and response to bioterrorism and naturally occurring infectious diseases. JAMA. 2002;288 (5):622628.

8. O Merin , N Ash , G Levy , MJ Schwaber , Y. Kreiss The Israeli field hospital in Haiti—ethical dilemmas in early disaster response. N Engl J Med. 2010;362 (11):e3820200362.

9. N Pesik , ME Keim , KV. Iserson Terrorism and the ethics of emergency medical care. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37 (6):642646.

10. L Rubinson , JB Nuzzo , DS Talmor , T O’Toole , BR Kramer , TV. Inglesby Augmentation of hospital critical care capacity after bioterrorist attacks or epidemics: recommendations of the Working Group on Emergency Mass Critical Care. Crit Care Med. 2005;33 (10):23932403.

12. AK Thompson , K Faith , JL Gibson , RE. Upshur Pandemic influenza preparedness: an ethical framework to guide decision-making. BMC Med Ethics. 2006;7:E1217144926.

22. CN Coleman , DM Weinstock , R. Casagrande Triage and treatment tools for use in a scarce resources-crisis standards of care setting after a nuclear detonation. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011;5(Suppl 1)S98S110.

24. CN Coleman , C Hrdina , JL. Bader Medical response to a radiologic/nuclear event: integrated plan from the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Department of Health and Human Services. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;53 (2):213222.

28. SL. Fink Worst case: rethinking tertiary triage protocols in pandemics and other health emergencies. Crit Care. 2010;14 (1):10320122291.

29. T Guest , G Tantam , N Donlin , K Tantam , H McMillan , A. Tillyard An observational cohort study of triage for critical care provision during pandemic influenza: ‘clipboard physicians’ or ‘evidenced based medicine’? Anaesthesia. 2009;64 (11):11991206.

30. Z Khan , J Hulme , N. Sherwood An assessment of the validity of SOFA score based triage in H1N1 critically ill patients during an influenza pandemic. Anaesthesia. 2009;64 (12):12831288.

32. MD Christian , L Hawryluck , RS. Wax Development of a triage protocol for critical care during an influenza pandemic. CMAJ. 2006;175 (11):13771381.

33. LO. Gostin Medical countermeasures for pandemic influenza: ethics and the law. JAMA. 2006;295 (5):554556.

38. A Kaji , KL Koenig , T. Bey Surge capacity for healthcare systems: a conceptual framework. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13 (11):11571159.

39. P Dolan , R Shaw , A Tsuchiya , A. Williams QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature. Health Econ. 2005;14 (2):197208.

40. JP Garoon , PS. Duggan Discourses of disease, discourses of disadvantage: a critical analysis of National Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Plans. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67 (7):11331142.

41. A. Williams Intergenerational equity: an exploration of the ‘fair innings’ argument. Health Econ. 1997;6 (2):117132.

42. M Johri , LJ Damschroder , BJ Zikmund-Fisher , PA. Ubel The importance of age in allocating health care resources: does intervention-type matter? Health Econ. 2005;14 (7):669678.

47. AC Beekley , BW Starnes , JA. Sebesta Lessons learned from modern military surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2007;87 (1):157184, vii.

48. RH. Brook Health policy and public trust. JAMA. 2008;300 (2):211213.

51. NE Kass , J Otto , D O’Brien , M. Minson Ethics and severe pandemic influenza: maintaining essential functions through a fair and considered response. Biosecur Bioterror. 2008;6 (3):227236.

53. GR. Holt Making difficult ethical decisions in patient care during natural disasters and other mass casualty events. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;139 (2):181186.

54. TB Repine , P Lisagor , DJ. Cohen The dynamics and ethics of triage: rationing care in hard times. Mil Med. 2005;170 (6):505509.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
  • ISSN: 1935-7893
  • EISSN: 1938-744X
  • URL: /core/journals/disaster-medicine-and-public-health-preparedness
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 14
Total number of PDF views: 89 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 174 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.