Hostname: page-component-77c78cf97d-sp94z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-24T07:39:53.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

February–May 2017

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2017

Frank Cranmer
Frank Cranmer*
Affiliation:
Fellow, St Chad's College, Durham Honorary Research Fellow, Centre for Law and Religion, Cardiff University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The EU (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill completed its passage through Parliament and received Royal Assent on 16 March. On 29 March, the United Kingdom's Ambassador to the European Union, Tim Barrow, handed over the Prime Minister's formal letter of notification under Article 50 of the Treaty on the European Union to the President of the European Council, thereby triggering the withdrawal process. Inevitably, however, the period since the last report was dominated not so much by Brexit as by the unexpected General Election.

Information

Type
Parliamentary Report
Information
Ecclesiastical Law Journal , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 363 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 L Hughes, ‘Who are the DUP and will they demand a soft Brexit to prop up the Tories?’ Daily Telegraph, 9 June 2017, available at <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/0/Who-are-the-DUP-democratic-unionist-party-northern-ireland/>, accessed 14 June 2017.

2 Conservative and Unionist Party, Forward, Together: our plan for a stronger Britain and a prosperous future (London, 2017), p 37Google Scholar, emphasis added.

3 HL Deb, 6 March 2017, vol 779, cols 1175ff.

4 Ibid, col 1188.

5 Available at <https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/caste-in-great-britain-and-equality-law-a-public-consulation>, accessed 20 March 2017.

6 More correctly, Chandhok & Anor v Tirkey [2014] UKEAT 0190/14/1912.

7 Available at <https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/602509/CC25.pdf>, accessed 20 May 2017.

8 ‘Matters of material significance reportable to UK charity regulators’, available at <https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/611139/Matters_of_Material_Significance_reportable_to_UK_charity_regulators.pdf> accessed 20 May 2017.

9 ‘Telling your story well: public benefit reporting by charities’, available at <https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/609953/AMR_Telling_your_story_well_public_benefit_reporting_by_charities.pdf>, accessed 20 May 2017.

10 See the Charities (Protection and Social Investment) Act 2016 (Commencement No. 1 and Transitional Provision) Regulations 2016 SI/2016/815.

11 The text of the speech is available at <https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/news-and-events/news-and-blogs/2017/02/fundraising-and-regulatory-compliance-conference/>, accessed 14 June 2017.

12 Available at <https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/QS144/chapter/Quality-statement-2-Individualised-care>, accessed 20 May 2017.

13 ‘Stronger charities for a stronger society’, HL Paper 133, 26 March 2017, available at <https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201617/ldselect/ldchar/133/13302.htm>, accessed 20 May 2017.

14 As did my own proposal, on behalf of the Churches’ Legislation Advisory Service, that the Commission should undertake a project on certification of births.

15 G4S Secure Solutions NV [2017] EUECJ C-157/15; Bougnaoui and ADDH [2017] EUECJ C-188/15.

16 HC Deb 15 March 2017, vol 623, col 409.