Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-7wlv9 Total loading time: 0.984 Render date: 2022-05-21T09:23:55.138Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

ANALYZING THE RANDOM COEFFICIENT MODEL NONPARAMETRICALLY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

Abstract

Linearity in a causal relationship between a dependent variable and a set of regressors is a common assumption throughout economics. In this paper we consider the case when the coefficients in this relationship are random and distributed independently from the regressors. Our aim is to identify and estimate the distribution of the coefficients nonparametrically. We propose a kernel-based estimator for the joint probability density of the coefficients. Although this estimator shares certain features with standard nonparametric kernel density estimators, it also differs in some important characteristics that are due to the very different setup we are considering. Most importantly, the kernel is nonstandard and derives from the theory of Radon transforms. Consequently, we call our estimator the Radon transform estimator (RTE). We establish the large sample behavior of this estimator—in particular, rate optimality and asymptotic distribution. In addition, we extend the basic model to cover extensions, including endogenous regressors and additional controls. Finally, we analyze the properties of the estimator in finite samples by a simulation study, as well as an application to consumer demand using British household data.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We have received helpful comments from seminar participants in Copenhagen, Göttingen, Frankfurt, Mannheim, Oberwolfach, UCL, Northwestern, and Wien (ESEM), as well as from Jim Heckman and Arthur Lewbel. We would like to thank two referees for a very careful check of the paper and for very helpful suggestions. In particular, we would like to thank one of the referees for comments and hints to references on spherical kernel density estimators. Financial support by Landesstiftung Baden-Württemberg's Eliteförderungsprogramm is gratefully acknowledged.

References

Abramovich, F. & Silverman, B.W. (1998) Wavelet decomposition approaches to statistical inverse problems. Biometrika 85, 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajari, P., Fox, J.T., Kim, K., & Ryan, S. (2007) Identification and Estimation of Random Utility Models. Working paper, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Beran, R., Feuerverger, A., & Hall, P. (1996) On nonparametric estimation of intercept and slope distributions in random coefficient regression. Annals of Statistics 24, 2569–2692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beran, R. & Hall, P. (1992) Estimating coefficient distributions in random coefficient regressions. Annals of Statistics 20, 1970–1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borak, S., Härdle, W., Mammen, E., & Park, B.U. (2007) Time Series Modelling with Semiparametric Factor Dynamics. Working paper, University of Mannheim.Google Scholar
Briesch, R.A., Chintagunta, P.K., & Matzkin, R.L. (2007) Nonparametric Discrete Choice Models with Unobserved Heterogeneity Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christopeit, N. & Hoderlein, S. (2006) Local partitioned regression. Econometrica 74, 787–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, G., Hagmann, M., & Linton, O.B. (2008) Efficient Estimation of a Semiparametric Characteristic-Based Factor Model of Security Returns. Working paper, London School of Economics.10.2139/ssrn.1016025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devroye, L. & Györfi, L. (1985) Density Estimation: The L1 View. Wiley.Google Scholar
Donoho, D.L. (1995) Nonlinear solutions of linear inverse problems by wavelet-vaguelette decomposition. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis 2, 101–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feuerverger, A. & Vardi, Y. (2000) Positron emission tomography and random coefficients regression. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 52, 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, A. & Hahn, J. (2000) A consistent semiparametric estimation of the consumer surplus distribution. Economics Letters 69, 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J.T. & Gandhi, A. (2008) Identifying Heterogeneity in Economic Choice and Selection Models Using Mixtures. Working paper, University of Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gautier, E. & Kitamura, Y. (2008) Nonparametric Estimation in Random Coefficients Binary Choice Models. Mimeo, Department of Economics, Yale University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giné, E. & Guillou, A. (2002) Rates of strong uniform consistency for multivariate kernel density estimators. Annales of Institute Henri Poincaré 38(6), 907–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P., Watson, G.S., & Cabrera, J. (1987) Kernel density estimation with spherical data. Biometrika 74, 751–62.10.1093/biomet/74.4.751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Härdle, W. & Mammen, E. (1993) Comparing non parametric versus parametric regression fits. Annals of Statistics 21, 1926–1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, J. & Vytlacil, E. (1998) Instrumental variables methods for the correlated random coefficients model: estimating the average return to schooling when the return is correlated with schooling. Journal of Human Resources 33, 974–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helgason, S. (1999) The Radon Transform. Progress in Mathematics, vol. 5. Birkhäuser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hildreth, C. & Huock, J.P. (1968) Some estimators for a linear model with random coefficients. Journal of the American Statistical Association 63, 584–92.Google Scholar
Hoderlein, S. (2007) How Many Consumers are Rational. Working paper, University of Mannheim.Google Scholar
Hoderlein, S. & Lewbel, A. (2006) Price Dimension Reduction in Demand Systems with Many Goods. Working paper, University of Mannheim.Google Scholar
Hoderlein, S. & Mammen, E. (2007) Identification of marginal effects in nonseparable models without monotonicity. Econometrica 75, 1513–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoderlein, S. & Mammen, E. (2008) Identification and Estimation of Local Average Derivatives in Nonseparable Models without Monotonicity. Working paper, University of Mannheim.10.1111/j.1368-423X.2008.00273.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsiao, C. & Pesaran, H. (2004) Random Coefficient Panel Data Models. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 1236.Google Scholar
Ibragimov, I.A. & Hasminskii, R.Z. (1981) Statistical Estimation: Asymptotic Theory. Springer. [Originally published in Russian in 1979.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichimura, H. & Thompson, T.S. (1998) Maximum likelihood estimation of a binary choice model with random coefficients of unknown distribution. Journal of Econometrics 86, 269–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, I. & Silverman, B. (1990) Speed of estimation in positron emission tomography. Annals of Statistics 18, 251–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemelä, J. (2000) Estimation of densities and derivatives of densities with directional data. Journals of Multivariate Analysis 73, 18–40.10.1006/jmva.1999.1861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemelä, J. & Mammen, E. (2008) Empirical Risk Minimization in Inverse Problems. Mimeo, Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Oulu.Google Scholar
Korostelev, A.P. & Tsybakov, A.B. (1993) Minimax Theory of Image Reconstruction. Lecture Notes in Statistics, 82. Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-2712-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewbel, A. (2001) Demand systems with and without errors. American Economic Review 91, 611–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mammen, E., Linton, O.B., & Nielsen, J.P. (1999) The existence and asymptotic properties of a backfitting projection algorithm under weak conditions. Annals of Statistics 27, 1443–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mammen, E., Støve, B., & Tjøstheim, D. (2008) Nonparametric additive models for panels of time series. Working paper, Department of Economics, University of Mannheim.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matzkin, R.L. (2007) Heterogeneous Choice. Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Natterer, F. (2001) The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography. SIAM Classics in Applied Mathematics, vol. 32. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stute, W. (1984). The oscillation behaviour of empirical processes: The multivariate case. Annals of Probability 12(2), 361–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swamy, P.A.V.B. (1970) Efficient inference in a random coefficient model. Econometrica 38(2), 311–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, J. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press.Google Scholar
39
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

ANALYZING THE RANDOM COEFFICIENT MODEL NONPARAMETRICALLY
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

ANALYZING THE RANDOM COEFFICIENT MODEL NONPARAMETRICALLY
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

ANALYZING THE RANDOM COEFFICIENT MODEL NONPARAMETRICALLY
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *