Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7ccbd9845f-dxj8b Total loading time: 0.295 Render date: 2023-02-01T23:13:30.165Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true
  • English
Econometric Theory Econometric Theory

Article contents

BAYESIAN CONSISTENCY FOR STATIONARY MODELS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2007

Antonio Lijoi ,
Igor Prünster  and
Stephen G. Walker
Antonio Lijoi
Affiliation:
University of Pavia and CNR-IMATI Milan
Igor Prünster
Affiliation:
University of Turin College Carlo Alberto, and ICER
Stephen G. Walker
Affiliation:
University of Kent
Get access Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we provide a Doob-style consistency theorem for stationary models. Many applications involving Bayesian inference deal with non independent and identically distributed data, in particular, with stationary data. However, for such models, there is still a theoretical gap to be filled regarding the asymptotic properties of Bayesian procedures. The primary goal to be achieved is establishing consistency of the sequence of posterior distributions. Here we provide an answer to the problem. Bayesian methods have recently gained growing popularity in economic modeling, thus implying the timeliness of the present paper. Indeed, we secure Bayesian procedures against possible inconsistencies. No results of such a generality are known up to now.The authors are grateful for the comments and suggestions of two referees. Antonio Lijoi and Igor Prünster were supported by the Italian Ministry of University and Research, grants 2006134525 and 2006133449, respectively. The research of Stephen G. Walker was funded by an EPSRC Advanced Research Fellowship.

Type
MISCELLANEA
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , August 2007 , pp. 749 - 759
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aït-Sahalia, Y. (2002) Maximum likelihood estimation of discretely sampled diffusions: A closed-form approximation approach. Econometrica 70, 223–262.Google Scholar
Aldous, D. (1985) Exchangeability and Related Topics. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1117. Springer-Verlag.
Berti, P., L. Pratelli, & P. Rigo (2006) Almost sure weak convergence of random probability measures. Stochastics 78, 91–97.Google Scholar
Beskos, A., O. Papaspiliopoulos, G.O. Roberts, & P. Fernhead (2006) Exact and efficient likelihood-based estimation for diffusion processes. With discussion. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 68, 333–382.Google Scholar
Bibby, B.M. & M. Sørensen (1995) Martingale estimation functions for discretely observed diffusion processes. Bernoulli 1, 17–39.Google Scholar
Billingsley, P. (1961) Statistical Inference for Markov Processes. Statistical Research Monographs. University of Chicago Press.
Brockwell, P.J. & R.A. Davis (1996) Time Series: Theory and Methods. 3rd ed. Springer-Verlag.
Chib, S. (1996) Calculating posterior distributions and modal estimates in Markov mixture models. Journal of Econometrics 75, 79–97.Google Scholar
Chib, S. & E. Greenberg (1996) Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation methods in econometrics. Econometric Theory 12, 409–431.Google Scholar
Dacunha-Castelle, D. & D. Florens-Zmirou (1986) Estimation of the coefficients of a diffusion from discrete observations. Stochastics 19, 263–284.Google Scholar
Doob, J.L. (1949) Application of the theory of martingales. In Le Calcul des Probabilités et ses Applications, pp. 23–27. Colloques Internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, no. 13, Paris.
Elerian, O., S. Chib, & N. Shephard (2001) Likelihood inference for discretely observed non-linear diffusions. Econometrica 69, 959–993.Google Scholar
Eraker, B. (2001) MCMC analysis of diffusion models with applications to finance. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 19, 177–191.Google Scholar
Fiorentini, G., E. Sentana, & N. Shephard (2004) Likelihood-based estimation of latent generalised ARCH structures. Econometrica 72, 1481–1517.Google Scholar
Gourieroux, C., A. Monfort, & E. Renault (1993) Indirect inference. Journal of Applied Econometrics 8, 85–118.Google Scholar
Huerta, G. & M. West (1999a) Priors and component structures in autoregressive time series models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 61, 881–899.Google Scholar
Huerta, G. & M. West (1999b) Bayesian inference on periodicities and component spectral structure in time series. Journal of Time Series Analysis 20, 401–416.Google Scholar
Karatzas, I. & S.E. Shreve (1991) Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus. Springer-Verlag.
Lijoi, A., I. Prünster, & S.G. Walker (2004) Extending Doob's consistency theorem to nonparametric densities. Bernoulli 10, 651–663.Google Scholar
Maitra, A. (1977) Integral representations of invariant measures. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 229, 209–225.Google Scholar
Mena, R.H. & S.G. Walker (2005) Stationary autoregressive models via a Bayesian nonparametric approach. Journal of Time Series Analysis 26, 789–805.Google Scholar
Pedersen, A.R. (1995) A new approach to maximum likelihood estimation for stochastic differential equations based on discrete observations. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 22, 55–71.Google Scholar
Pitt, M.K. & N. Shephard (1999) Filtering via simulation: Auxiliary particle filters. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94, 590–599.Google Scholar
Roberts, G.O. & O. Stramer (2001) On inference for partially observed non-linear diffusion models using the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. Biometrika 88, 603–621.Google Scholar
West, M. & J. Harrison (1997) Bayesian Forecasting and Dynamic Models. Springer-Verlag.
5
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

BAYESIAN CONSISTENCY FOR STATIONARY MODELS
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

BAYESIAN CONSISTENCY FOR STATIONARY MODELS
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

BAYESIAN CONSISTENCY FOR STATIONARY MODELS
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *