Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-kfj7r Total loading time: 20.494 Render date: 2022-12-05T10:32:48.841Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

CONSOLIDATION OF THE HAAVELMO-COWLES COMMISSION RESEARCH PROGRAM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2014

Duo Qin*
Affiliation:
University of London
*
*Address correspondence to Duo Qin, Department of Economics, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, United Kingdom; e-mail: dq1@soas.ac.uk.

Abstract

Much of modern econometrics stems directly from the post-1940 works of Haavelmo and the Cowles Commission (CC) Monograph 10. This paper examines the consolidation process of the Haavelmo-CC research program mainly during the 1950–70 period from three aspects: (i) developments of econometrics textbooks, (ii) emerging themes and trends in econometric research, and (iii) the contribution of the program to empirical modeling of real-world issues. The examination reveals that the program has gained dominance primarily through its adherence to the scientific banner and style rather than its empirical relevance. The adoption of the hard science methodology is decisive in winning over the academic community; the taxonomy of econometrics into steps involving primarily specification, identification, and estimation has played a pivotal role in generating compartmentalized research topics with manageable technical challenge and also in facilitating the educational need for compiling self-contained subjects and definitely soluble questions.

Type
ARTICLES
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adelman, F. & Adelman, I. (1959) The dynamic properties of the Klein-Goldberger model. Econometrica 27, 596625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, J. (1989) Autonomy. Oxford Economic Papers 41, 1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, J.S. (1978) Forecasting with econometric methods: Folklore versus fact. The Journal of Business 51, 549564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, J.S. (1979) Advocacy and objectivity in science. Management Science 25, 423428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barger, H. & Klein, L.R. (1954) A quarterly model for the United States economy. Journal of the American Statistical Association 49, 413437.Google Scholar
Basmann, R. (1957) A generalized classical method of linear estimation of coefficients in a structural equation. Econometrica 25, 7783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basmann, R. (1974) Exact finite sample distributions for some econometric estimators and test statistics: A survey and appraisal. In Intriligator, M. & Kendrick, D. (eds.), Frontiers of Quantitative Economics, Ch. 4. North-Holland.Google Scholar
Bentzel, R. & Wold, H.O.A. (1946) On statistical demand analysis from the viewpoint of simultaneous equations. Skandinavisk Aktuarietidskrift 29, 95114.Google Scholar
Bjerkholt, O. (2007) Writing “The Probability Approach” with nowhere to go: Haavelmo in the United States, 1939–1944. Econometric Theory 23, 775837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjerkholt, O. & Qin, D. (eds.) (2010) A Dynamic Approach to Economic Theory: The Yale Lectures of Ragnar Frisch in 1930. Routledge.Google Scholar
Bodkin, R.G., Klein, L.R., & Marwah, K. (1991) A History of Macroeconometric Model-Building. Edward Elgar Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, G. & Griliches, Z. (1975) Unobservables with a variance-components structure: Ability, schooling, and the economic success of brothers. International Economic Review 16, 422450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christ, C.F. (1952a) History of the Cowles Commission, 1932–1952. In Economic Theory and Measurement: A Twenty Year Research Report 1932–1952, pp. 365. Cowles Commission for Research in Economics, Chicago.Google Scholar
Christ, C.F. (1952b) A test of an econometric model for the United States, 1921–1947. CowlesCommission Papers, New Series No. 49.
Christ, C.F. (1960) Simultaneous equations estimation: Any verdict yet? Econometrica 28, 835845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christ, C.F. (1966) Econometric Models and Methods. Wiley.Google Scholar
Christ, C.F. (1994) The Cowles Commission’s contributions to econometrics at Chicago, 1939–1955. Journal of Economic Literature 32, 3059.Google Scholar
Cramer, J.S. (1969) Empirical Econometrics. North-Holland.Google Scholar
Cox, D.R. (1990) Role of models in statistical analysis. Statistical Science 5, 169174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhrymes, P.J. (1970) Econometrics: Statistical Foundations and Applications. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Drèze, J. (1962) The Bayesian Approach to Simultaneous Equations Estimation. O.N.R. Research Memorandum 67, Northwestern University; published in Qin, D. (ed.) (2012)The Rise of Econometrics, vol. 3. Routledge.Google Scholar
Duesenberry, J.S., Fromm, G., Klein, L.R., & Kuh, E. (1965) The Brookings Quarterly Econometric Model of the United States. Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Duesenberry, J.S., Fromm, G., Klein, L.R., & Kuh, E. (1969) The Brookings Model: Some Further Results. Rand McNally & Company.Google Scholar
Epstein, R. (1987) A History of Econometrics. North Holland.Google Scholar
Epstein, R. (1989) The fall of OLS in structural estimation. Oxford Economic Papers 41, 94107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, K.A. (1956) Econometric models of the United States. Journal of Political Economy 64, 128142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, K.A. (1968) Intermediate Economic Statistics. Wiley.Google Scholar
Frisch, R. (1938) Autonomy of Economic Relations: Statistical Versus Theoretical Relations in Economic Macrodynamics. Unpublished Memo; in D.F. Hendry & M.S. Morgan (eds.) (1995)The Foundations of Economic Analysis, pp. 407419. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frisch, R. (1970) Econometrics in the world of today. In Eltis, W.A., Scott, M.FG., & Wolfe, J.N. (eds.), Induction, Growth and Trade: Essays in Honour of Sir Roy Harrod, pp. 153166. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, C.L. & Qin, D. (2006) The first fifty years of modern econometrics. In Patterson &, K.Mills, T.C. (eds.), Palgrave Handbook of Econometrics, pp. 117155. Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Gilbert, C.L. & Qin, D. (2007) Representation in econometrics: A historical perspective. In Boumans, M. (ed.) Measurement in Economics: A Handbook, Ch. 10. Elsevier Inc.Google Scholar
Girshick, M.A. & Haavelmo, T. (1947) Statistical analysis of the demand for food: Examples of simultaneous estimation of structural equations. Econometrica 15, 79110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberger, A.S. (1959) Impact Multipliers and Dynamic Properties of the Klein-Goldberger Model. North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Goldberger, A.S. (1964) Econometric Theory. Wiley.Google Scholar
Gordon, R.J. (1970) The Brookings model in action: A review article. Journal of Political Economy 78, 489525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griliches, Z. (1968) The Brookings model volume: A review article. Review of Economics and Statistics 50, 215234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haavelmo, T. (1939) On the statistical testing of hypotheses in economic theory; published in Qin, D. (ed.) (2013)The Rise of Econometrics, vol. 2, no. 25. Routledge.Google Scholar
Haavelmo, T. (1943) The statistical implications of a system of simultaneous equations. Econometrica 11, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haavelmo, T. (1944) The probability approach in econometrics. Econometrica 12(Suppl); revised from the 1941 mimeograph entitled ‘On the Theory and Measurement of Economic Relations’.
Haavelmo, T. (1947) Methods of measuring the marginal propensity to consume. Journal of theAmerican Statistical Association 42, 105122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, J.J. (2000) Causal parameters and policy analysis in economics: A twentieth century retrospective. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, 4597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, D.F. & Morgan, M.S. (1989) A re-analysis of confluence analysis. Oxford Economic Papers 41, 3552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, D.F. & Morgan, M.S. (eds.) (1995) The Foundations of Econometric Analysis. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hildreth, C. (1986) The Cowles Commission in Chicago 1939–1955. Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, W. & Koopmans, T. (eds.) (1953) Studies in Econometric Method. Cowles Commission Monograph 14. Wiley.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. (1963) Econometric Methods. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Klein, L.R. (1947) The use of econometric models as a guide to economic policy. Econometrica 15, 111151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, L.R. (1950) Economic Fluctuations in the United States 1921–1941. Cowles Commission Monograph 11. Wiley.Google Scholar
Klein, L.R. (1953) A Textbook of Econometrics. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Klein, L.R. (1960) The efficiency of estimation of econometric models. In Pfouts, R.W. (ed.), Essays in Economic and Econometrics: A Volume in Honor of Harold Hotelling. University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Klein, L.R. (1971) Whither econometrics. Journal of the American Statistical Association 66, 415421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, L.R. & Goldberger, A.S. (1955) An Econometric Model of the United States 1929–1952.North-Holland.Google Scholar
Klein, L.R., Ball, R.J., Hazlewood, A., & Vandome, P. (1961) An Econometric Model of the United Kingdom. Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Koopmans, T.C. (1947) Measurement without theory. Review of Economics and Statistics 29,161179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, T.C. (1949) Reply to Rutledge Vining. Review of Economics and Statistics 31, 8691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, T.C. (ed.) (1950) Statistical Inference in Dynamic Economic Models. Cowles Commission Monograph 10. Wiley.Google Scholar
Koopmans, T.C. (1957) Three Essays on the State of Economic Science. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Koutsoyiannis, A. (1973) Theory of Econometrics: An Introductory Exposition of Econometric Methods. Barnes & Noble Books.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T.S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leamer, E.E. (1978) Specification Searches. Wiley.Google Scholar
Leontief, W. (1971) Theoretical assumptions and non-observed facts. American Economic Review 61, 17.Google Scholar
Leser, C.E.V. (1966) Econometric Techniques and Problems. Hafner Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Liu, T.-C. (1955) A simple forecasting model for the U.S. economy. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers 4, 434466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, T.-C. (1960) Underidentification, structural estimation, and forecasting. Econometrica 28, 855865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, T.-C. (1963) An exploratory quarterly econometric model of effective demand in the post-war U.S. economy. Econometrica 31, 301348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R.E. (1972) Econometric testing of the natural rate hypothesis. In Eckstein, O. (ed.), The Econometrics of Price Determination Conference, pp. 5059. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.Google Scholar
Lucas, R.E. (1973) Some international evidence on output-inflation tradeoffs. American Economic Review 63, 326334.Google Scholar
Lucas, R.E. & Sargent, T.J. (1979) After Keynesian macroeconomics. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 3(Spring), 116.Google Scholar
Maddala, G.S. (1977) Econometrics. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, E. (1966) (French ed. 1964) Statistical Methods in Econometrics. North-Holland.Google Scholar
Marschak, J. (1946) Quantitative Studies in Economic Behaviour (Foundations of Rational Economic Policy). Report to the Rockefeller Foundation, Rockefeller Archive Centre.
Marschak, J. (1950) Statistical inference in economics: An introduction. In Koopmans, T. (ed.),Statistical Inference in Dynamic Economic Models. Cowles Commission Monograph 10. Wiley.Google Scholar
Marshall, A.W. (1950) A test of Klein’s Model III for changes of structure (abstract). Econometrica 18, 291.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D.N. (1983) The rhetoric of economics. Journal of Economic Literature 21, 481517.Google Scholar
Orcutt, G.H. (1952) Toward partial redirection of econometrics. Review of Economics and Statistics 34, 195200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagan, A. (1987) Three econometric methodologies: A critical appraisal. Journal of Economic Surveys 1, 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagan, A. (1995) Three econometric methodologies: An update. In Oxley, L., George, D.A.R., Roberts, C.L., & Sayer, S. (eds.), Surveys in Econometrics, pp. 3041. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Phelps Brown, E.H. (1937) Report of the Oxford Meeting, September 25–29, 1936. Econometrica 5, 361383.Google Scholar
Phelps Brown, E.H. (1972) The underdevelopment of economics. The Economic Journal 82, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, P.C.B. (1977) Econometrics: A View from the Toolroom. University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Qin, D. (1989) Formalisation of identification theory, Oxford Economic Papers 41, 7393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, D. (1993) The Formation of Econometrics: A Historical Perspective. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Qin, D. (1996) Bayesian econometrics: The first twenty years. Econometric Theory 12, 500516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, D. (2011) The Phillips curve from the perspective of the history of econometrics. History of Political Economy 43(Suppl 1), 283308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, D. (2013) A History of Econometrics: The Reformation from the 1970s. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, D. (2014) Inextricability of autonomy and confluence in econometrics, SOAS Department of Economics Working Paper Series, No. 189, The School of Oriental and African Studies.
Sargan, D. (1958) The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica 26, 393415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sargan, D. (1959) The estimation of relationships with autocorrelated residuals by the use of instrumental variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 21, 91105.Google Scholar
Sargan, D. (1964) Wages and prices in the United Kingdom: A study in econometric methodology. In Hart, R.E., Mills, G., & Whittaker, J.K. (eds.), Econometric Analysis for National Economic Planning, pp. 2563. Butterworth.Google Scholar
Schachter, G. (1973) Some developments in economic science since 1965: Methods, ideas, approaches. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 32, 331335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanos, A. (2006) Econometrics in retrospect and prospect. In Patterson, K. & Mills, T.C. (eds.),Palgrave Handbook of Econometrics. Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Suits, D.B. (1962) Forecasting and analysis with an econometric model. American Economic Review 52, 104132.Google Scholar
Summers, L.H. (1991) The scientific illusion in empirical macroeconomics. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 93, 129148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theil, H. (1953) Estimation and simultaneous correlation in complete equation systems. Centraal Planbureau, (Mimeographed).
Theil, H. (1971) Principles of Econometrics. North-Holland Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, J. (1939) Statistical Testing of Business-Cycle Theories. League of Nations.
Tinbergen, J. (1951) Econometrics. The Blakiston Company.Google Scholar
Tintner, G. (1952) Econometrics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Tobin, J. (1955) Multiple Probit Regression of Dichotomous Economic Variables. Cowles Foundation Discussion paper no. 1.
Tobin, J. (1958) Estimation of relationships of limited dependent variables. Econometrica 26, 2436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valavanis, S. (1959) Econometrics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Vining, R. (1949) Koopmans on the choice of variables to be studied and of methods of measurement, A rejoinder. Review of Economics and Statistics 31, 7786; 9194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, H.M. (1958) A Monte Carlo study of estimates of simultaneous linear structural equations. Econometrica 26, 117133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, K.F. (1969) Some recent developments in applied econometrics: Dynamic models and simultaneous equation systems. Journal of Economic Literature 7, 771796.Google Scholar
Wallis, K.F. (1973) Topics in Applied Econometrics. Gray-Mills.Google Scholar
Waugh, F.V. (1961) The place of least squares in econometrics. Econometrica 29, 386396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wold, H.O.A. (1954) Causality and econometrics. Econometrica 22, 162177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wold, H.O.A. (1956) Causal inference from observational data. Journal of Royal Statistical Society Series A 119, 2861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wold, H.O.A. & Juréen, L. (1953) Demand Analysis: A Study in Econometrics. Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Wonnacott, R.J. & Wonnacott, T.H. (1970) Econometrics. Wiley.Google Scholar
Worswick, G.D.N. (1972) Is progress in economics science possible? The Economic Journal 82,7386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynn, R.F. & Holden, K. (1974) An Introduction to Applied Econometric Analysis. Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zellner, A. (1962) An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association 57, 348368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zellner, A. (1971) An Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics. Wiley.Google Scholar
7
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

CONSOLIDATION OF THE HAAVELMO-COWLES COMMISSION RESEARCH PROGRAM
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

CONSOLIDATION OF THE HAAVELMO-COWLES COMMISSION RESEARCH PROGRAM
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

CONSOLIDATION OF THE HAAVELMO-COWLES COMMISSION RESEARCH PROGRAM
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *