Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-dvtzq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T07:21:04.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SPECIFICATION TESTING IN MODELS WITH MANYINSTRUMENTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2010

Stanislav Anatolyev  and
Nikolay Gospodinov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper studies the asymptotic validity of theAnderson–Rubin (AR) test and theJ test for overidentifyingrestrictions in linear models with many instruments.When the number of instruments increases at the samerate as the sample size, we establish that theconventional AR andJ tests are asymptoticallyincorrect. Some versions of these tests, which aredeveloped for situations with moderately manyinstruments, are also shown to be asymptoticallyinvalid in this framework. We propose modificationsof the AR and Jtests that deliver asymptotically correct sizes.Importantly, the corrected tests are robust to thenumerosity of the moment conditions in the sensethat they are valid for both few and manyinstruments. The simulation results illustrate theexcellent properties of the proposed tests.

Information

Type
Brief Report
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 427 - 441
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

We thank the co-editor Richard Smith, tworeferees, and Bruce Hansen for very usefulcomments and suggestions. The second authorgratefully acknowledges financial support fromFQRSC and SSHRC.

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, T.G. & Sorensen, B.E. (1996) GMM estimation of a stochastic volatility model: A Monte Carlo study. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 14, 328–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, D.W. & Stock, J.H. (2007) Testing with many weak instruments. Journal of Econometrics 138, 24–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angrist, J.D. & Krueger, A.B. (1991) Does compulsory school attendance affect schooling and earnings? Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 979–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arellano, M. & Bond, S. (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an applications to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 58, 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekker, P.A. (1994) Alternative approximations to the distributions of instrumental variable estimators. Econometrica 62, 657–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnside, C. & Eichenbaum, M. (1996) Small-sample properties of GMM-based Wald tests. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 14, 294–308.Google Scholar
Chao, J. & Swanson, N. (2005) Consistent estimation with a large number of weak instruments. Econometrica 73, 1673–1692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, S.G., Imbens, G.W., & Newey, W.K. (2003) Empirical likelihood estimation and consistent tests with conditional moment restrictions. Journal of Econometrics 117, 55–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufour, J.M. & Taamouti, M. (2007) Further results on projection-based inference in IV regressions with weak, collinear or missing instruments. Journal of Econometrics 139, 133–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, C., Hausman, J., & Newey, W.K. (2008) Estimation with many instrumental variables. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 26, 398–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelejian, H.H. & Prucha, I.R. (2001) On the asymptotic distribution of the Moran I test statistic with applications. Journal of Econometrics 104, 219–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenker, R. & Machado, J.A.F. (1999) GMM inference when the number of moment conditions is large. Journal of Econometrics 93, 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledoit, O. & Wolf, M. (2004) A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 88, 365–411.Google Scholar
Newey, W.K. (2004) Many Instrument Asymptotics. Manuscript, MIT.Google Scholar
Peiser, A.M. (1943) Asymptotic formulas for significance levels of certain distributions. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 14, 56–62.Google Scholar
Silverstein, J.W. (1995) Strong convergence of the empirical distribution of eigenvalues of large dimensional random matrices. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 55, 331–339.Google Scholar