Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-8hm5d Total loading time: 0.275 Render date: 2022-05-28T01:34:15.521Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

TESTING FOR UNIT ROOTS IN THE PRESENCE OF A POSSIBLE BREAK IN TREND AND NONSTATIONARY VOLATILITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

Giuseppe Cavaliere
Affiliation:
University of Bologna
David I. Harvey*
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Stephen J. Leybourne
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
A.M. Robert Taylor
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
*
*Address correspondence to David Harvey, School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom; e-mail: dave.harvey@nottingham.ac.uk.

Abstract

We analyze the impact of nonstationary volatility on the break fraction estimator and associated trend break unit root tests of Harris, Harvey, Leybourne, and Taylor (2009) (HHLT). We show that although HHLT’s break fraction estimator retains the same large-sample properties as demonstrated by HHLT for homoskedastic shocks, the limiting null distributions of unit root statistics based around this estimator are not pivotal under nonstationary volatility. A solution to the identified inference problem, which does not require the practitioner to specify a parametric model for volatility, is provided using the wild bootstrap and is shown to perform well in practice.

Type
ARTICLES
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, D.W.K. (1993) Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point. Econometrica 61, 821856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, D.W.K. & Buchinsky, M. (2001) Evaluation of a three-step method for choosing the number of bootstrap repetitions. Journal of Econometrics 103, 345386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, J. (1994) Least squares estimation of a shift in a linear process. Journal of Time Series Analysis 15, 453472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, A., Lumsdaine, R., & Stock, J. (1992) Recursive and sequential tests of the unit root and trend break hypotheses: Theory and international evidence. Journal of Business and Economics Statistics 10, 271288.Google Scholar
Berk, K.N. (1974) Consistent autoregressive spectral estimates. Annals of Statistics 2, 489502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busetti, F. & Taylor, A.M.R. (2003) Testing against stochastic trend in the presence of variance shifts. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 21, 510531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavaliere, G., Harvey, D.I., Leybourne, S.J., & Taylor, A.M.R. (2009) Testing for Unit Roots in the Presence of a Possible Break in Trend and Non-stationary Volatility. Granger Centre Discussion paper 09/05, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Cavaliere, G. & Taylor, A.M.R. (2007) Testing for unit roots in time series models with non-stationary volatility. Journal of Econometrics 140, 919947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavaliere, G. & Taylor, A.M.R. (2008) Bootstrap unit root tests for time series with non-stationary volatility. Econometric Theory 24, 4371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Y. & Park, Y.J. (2003) A sieve bootstrap for the test of a unit root. Journal of Time Series Analysis 24, 379400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J. (1994) Stochastic Limit Theory. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T.J. & Stock, J.H. (1996) Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64, 813836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, S. & Kilian, L. (2004) Bootstrapping autoregressions with conditional heteroskedasticity of unknown form. Journal of Econometrics 123, 89120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, S. & Kilian, L. (2007) Asymptotic and bootstrap inference for AR(∞) processes with conditional heteroskedasticity. Econometric Reviews 26, 609641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, B.E. (1996) Inference when a nuisance parameter is not identified under the null hypothesis. Econometrica 64, 413430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, D., Harvey, D.I., Leybourne, S.J., & Taylor, A.M.R. (2009) Testing for a unit root in the presence of a possible break in trend. Econometric Theory 25, 15451588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, D. & Perron, P. (2009) Unit root tests allowing for a break in the trend function at an unknown time under both the null and alternative hypotheses. Journal of Econometrics 148, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, T.H., Leybourne, S., & Newbold, P. (2002) Unit root tests with a break in innovation variance. Journal of Econometrics 109, 365387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, R.Y. (1988) Bootstrap procedures under some non i.i.d. models. Annals of Statistics 16, 16961708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mammen, E. (1993) Bootstrap and wild bootstrap for high dimensional linear models. Annals of Statistics 21, 255285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, S. & Perron, P. (2001) Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica 69, 15191554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, L.C., Kuan, C.-M. & Newbold, P. (1995) Spurious break. Econometric Theory 11, 736749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perron, P. (1989) The Great Crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57, 13611401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perron, P. (1997) Further evidence of breaking trend functions in macroeconomic variables. Journal of Econometrics 80, 355385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perron, P. & Qu, Z. (2007) A simple modification to improve the finite sample properties of Ng and Perron’s unit root tests. Economics Letters 94, 1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perron, P. & Rodríguez, G. (2003) GLS detrending, efficient unit root tests and structural change. Journal of Econometrics 115, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perron, P. & Zhu, X. (2005) Structural breaks with deterministic and stochastic trends. Journal of Econometrics 129, 65119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sensier, M. & van Dijk, D. (2004) Testing for volatility changes in U.S. macroeconomic time series. Review of Economics & Statistics 86, 833839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, J.H. & Watson, M.W. (1996) Evidence on structural instability in macroeconomic time series relations. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 14, 1130.Google Scholar
Stock, J.H. & Watson, M.W. (1999) A comparison of linear and nonlinear univariate models for forecasting macroeconomic time series. In Engle, R.F. & White, H. (eds.), Cointegration, Causality and Forecasting: A Festschrift in Honour of Clive W.J. Granger, pp. 144. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stock, J. & Watson, M.W. (2005) Implications of Dynamic factor Analysis for VAR Models. NBER Working paper 11467.Google Scholar
Zivot, E. & Andrews, D.W.K. (1992) Further evidence on the Great Crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 10, 251270.Google Scholar
14
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

TESTING FOR UNIT ROOTS IN THE PRESENCE OF A POSSIBLE BREAK IN TREND AND NONSTATIONARY VOLATILITY
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

TESTING FOR UNIT ROOTS IN THE PRESENCE OF A POSSIBLE BREAK IN TREND AND NONSTATIONARY VOLATILITY
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

TESTING FOR UNIT ROOTS IN THE PRESENCE OF A POSSIBLE BREAK IN TREND AND NONSTATIONARY VOLATILITY
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *