Skip to main content
×
×
Home

ASYMPTOTICS OF DIAGONAL ELEMENTS OF PROJECTION MATRICES UNDER MANY INSTRUMENTS/REGRESSORS

  • Stanislav Anatolyev (a1) and Pavel Yaskov (a2)
Abstract

This article sheds light on the asymptotic behavior of diagonal elements of projection matrices associated with instruments or regressors under many instrument/regressor asymptotics. When the diagonal elements do not exhibit variation asymptotically, certain results in the many instrument/regressor literature lead to elegant solutions and conclusions. We establish conditions when this happens, provide relevant examples, and analyze instrument designs, for which this property does or does not hold.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      ASYMPTOTICS OF DIAGONAL ELEMENTS OF PROJECTION MATRICES UNDER MANY INSTRUMENTS/REGRESSORS
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      ASYMPTOTICS OF DIAGONAL ELEMENTS OF PROJECTION MATRICES UNDER MANY INSTRUMENTS/REGRESSORS
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      ASYMPTOTICS OF DIAGONAL ELEMENTS OF PROJECTION MATRICES UNDER MANY INSTRUMENTS/REGRESSORS
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Address correspondence to Stanislav Anatolyev, CERGE-EI, Politických vězňů 7, 11121 Prague 1, Czech Republic; e-mail: stanislav.anatolyev@cerge-ei.cz.
Footnotes
Hide All

We would like to thank the editor Peter Phillips and co-editor Victor Chernozhukov for their quick and professional handling of the manuscript, as well as a diligent referee who provided very useful comments. The second author gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the Russian Science Foundation via grant 14-21-00162.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Abutaliev, A. & Anatolyev, S. (2013) Asymptotic variance under many instruments: numerical computations. Economics Letters 118(2), 272274.
Adamczak, R., Latala, R., Litvak, A.E., Oleszkiewicz, K., Pajor, A., & Tomczak-Jaegermann, N. (2014) A short proof of Paouris’ inequality. Canadian Mathematical Bulletin 57, 38.
Anatolyev, S. (2012) Inference in regression models with many regressors. Journal of Econometrics 170(2), 368382.
Anatolyev, S. (2013) Instrumental variables estimation and inference in the presence of many exogenous regressors. Econometrics Journal 16(1), 2772.
Anatolyev, S. & Gospodinov, N. (2011) Specification testing in models with many instruments. Econometric Theory 27, 427441.
Angrist, J. & Krueger, A. (1991) Does compulsory school attendance affect schooling and earnings? Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 9791014.
Anderson, T.W., Kunimoto, N., & Matsushita, Y. (2010) On the asymptotic optimality of the LIML estimator with possibly many instruments. Journal of Econometrics 157, 191204.
Anderson, T.W., Kunimoto, N., & Matsushita, Y. (2011) On finite sample properties of alternative estimators of coefficients in a structural equation with many instruments. Journal of Econometrics 165, 5869.
Bagnoli, M. & Bergstrom, T. (2005) Log-concave probability and its applications. Economic Theory 26, 445469.
Bai, Z. & Silverstein, J. (2010) Spectral analysis of large dimensional random matrices, 2nd edition. Springer.
Bekker, P.A. (1994) Alternative approximations to the distributions of instrumental variable estimators. Econometrica 62, 657681.
Bekker, P.A. & Crudu, F. (2015) Jackknife instrumental variable estimation with heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics 185(2), 332342.
Bekker, P.A. & van der Ploeg, J. (2005) Instrumental variable estimation based on grouped data. Statistica Neerlandica 59, 239267.
Borell, C. (1975) Convex set functions in d-space. Periodica Mathematica Hungarica 6(2), 111136.
Calhoun, G. (2012) Hypothesis testing in linear regression when k / n is large. Journal of Econometrics 165(2), 368382.
Davidson, R. & MacKinnon, J.G. (2006) The case against JIVE. Journal of Applied Econometrics 21(6), 827833.
Hahn, J. & Inoue, A. (2002) A Monte Carlo comparison of various asymptotic approximations to the distribution of instrumental variables estimators. Econometric Reviews 21, 309336.
Hansen, C., Hausman, J., & Newey, W.K. (2008) Estimation with many instrumental variables. Journal of Business & Economics Statistics 26, 398422.
Hausman, J.A., Newey, W.K., Woutersen, T., Chao, J.C., & Swanson, N.R. (2012) Instrumental variable estimation with heteroskedasticity and many instruments. Quantitative Economics 3, 211255.
Kolesár, M. (2015) Minimum distance approach to inference with many instruments. manuscript. Princeton University.
Kunimoto, N. (2012) An optimal modification of the LIML estimation for many instruments and persistent heteroscedasticity. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 64(5), 881910.
Ledoux, M. (2001) The concentration of measure phenomenon. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 89. American Mathematical Society.
Lee, Y. & Okui, R. (2012) Hahn–Hausman test as a specification test. Journal of Econometrics 167(1), 133139.
Meurant, G. (1992) A review on the inverse of symmetric tridiagonal and block tridiagonal matrices. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 13(3), 707728.
Pastur, L. & Shcherbina, M. (2011) Eigenvalue Distribution of Large Random Matrices. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 171. American Mathematical Society.
Saumard, A. & Wellner, J.A. (2014) Log-concavity and strong log-concavity: A review. Statistics Surveys 8, 45114.
Sherman, J. & Morrison, W.J. (1950) Adjustment of an inverse matrix corresponding to a change in one element of a given matrix. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 21, 124127.
van Hasselt, M. (2010) Many instruments asymptotic approximations under nonnormal error distributions. Econometric Theory 26, 633645.
Wang, W. & Kaffo, M. (2016) Bootstrap inference for instrumental variable models with many weak instruments. Journal of Econometrics 192(1), 231268.
Yaskov, P.A. (2014) Lower bounds on the smallest eigenvalue of a sample covariance matrix. Electronic Communications in Probability 19, article 83.
Yaskov, P.A. (2016) Controlling the least eigenvalue of a random Gram matrix. Linear Algebra and its Applications 504, 108123.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Econometric Theory
  • ISSN: 0266-4666
  • EISSN: 1469-4360
  • URL: /core/journals/econometric-theory
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 149 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 414 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 12th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.