Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message

Login Alert

Cancel
Log in
×
×
Register
Log In
(0) Cart
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Cited by
  • Crossref logo 17
  • Google Scholar logo
Crossref Citations
Crossref logo
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Henry, Jérôme and McAdam, Peter 2001. Vol. 2, Issue. , p. 21.
  • CrossRef
Altissimo, Filippo and Corradi, Valentina 2002. Bounds for inference with nuisance parameters present only under the alternative. The Econometrics Journal, Vol. 5, Issue. 2, p. 494.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Altissimo, Filippo and Corradi, Valentina 2003. Strong rules for detecting the number of breaks in a time series. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 117, Issue. 2, p. 207.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Corradi, Valentina and Swanson, Norman R. 2004. Bootstrap Procedures for Recursive Estimation Schemes with Applications to Forecast Model Selection. SSRN Electronic Journal,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Leeb, Hannes and Pötscher, Benedikt M. 2005. MODEL SELECTION AND INFERENCE: FACTS AND FICTION. Econometric Theory, Vol. 21, Issue. 1, p. 21.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Corradi, Valentina and Swanson, Norman R. 2005. Nonparametric Bootstrap Procedures for Predictive Inference Based on Recursive Estimation Schemes. SSRN Electronic Journal,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Corradi, Valentina and Swanson, Norman R. 2006. Predictive density and conditional confidence interval accuracy tests. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 135, Issue. 1-2, p. 187.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Corradi, Valentina and Swanson, Norman R. 2007. NONPARAMETRIC BOOTSTRAP PROCEDURES FOR PREDICTIVE INFERENCE BASED ON RECURSIVE ESTIMATION SCHEMES*. International Economic Review, Vol. 48, Issue. 1, p. 67.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Hafner, Christian M. and Preminger, Arie 2010. Deciding between GARCH and stochastic volatility via strong decision rules. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Vol. 140, Issue. 3, p. 791.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Bandi, Federico M. Corradi, Valentina and Wilhelm, Daniel 2011. Data-Driven Bandwidth Selection for Nonparametric Nonstationary Regressions. SSRN Electronic Journal,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Gómez, Víctor 2013. A Strongly Consistent Criterion to Decide Between I(1) and I(0) Processes Based on Different Convergence Rates. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, p. 130102064343006.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Castagnetti, Carolina Rossi, Eduardo and Trapani, Lorenzo 2015. Inference on factor structures in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 184, Issue. 1, p. 145.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Kao, Chihwa Trapani, Lorenzo and Urga, Giovanni 2018. Testing for instability in covariance structures. Bernoulli, Vol. 24, Issue. 1,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Oka, Tatsushi and Perron, Pierre 2018. Testing for common breaks in a multiple equations system. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 204, Issue. 1, p. 66.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Trapani, Lorenzo 2021. Testing for strict stationarity in a random coefficient autoregressive model. Econometric Reviews, Vol. 40, Issue. 3, p. 220.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Corradi, Valentina Fosten, Jack and Gutknecht, Daniel 2023. Predictive Ability Tests with Possibly Overlapping Models. SSRN Electronic Journal,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Corradi, Valentina Fosten, Jack and Gutknecht, Daniel 2024. Predictive ability tests with possibly overlapping models. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 241, Issue. 1, p. 105716.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Google Scholar Citations

View all Google Scholar citations for this article.

×
Cambridge University Press

Our Site

  • Accessibility
  • Contact & Help
  • Legal Notices

Our Platforms

  • Cambridge Core
  • Cambridge Open Engage
  • Cambridge Higher Education

Our Products

  • Journals
  • Books
  • Elements
  • Textbooks
  • Courseware

Join us online

Please choose a valid location.

  • Rights & Permissions
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Notice
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies Policy
Cambridge University Press 2025

Cancel
Confirm
×

Save article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

DECIDING BETWEEN I(0) AND I(1) VIA FLIL-BASED BOUNDS
  • Volume 15, Issue 5
  • Valentina Corradi (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466699155014
Please provide your Kindle email.
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

DECIDING BETWEEN I(0) AND I(1) VIA FLIL-BASED BOUNDS
  • Volume 15, Issue 5
  • Valentina Corradi (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466699155014
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

DECIDING BETWEEN I(0) AND I(1) VIA FLIL-BASED BOUNDS
  • Volume 15, Issue 5
  • Valentina Corradi (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466699155014
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Contents help
Close Contents help

- No HTML tags allowed
- Web page URLs will display as text only
- Lines and paragraphs break automatically
- Attachments, images or tables are not permitted

Please enter your response.

Your details

Email help
Close Email help

Your email address will be used in order to notify you when your comment has been reviewed by the moderator and in case the author(s) of the article or the moderator need to contact you directly.

Please enter a valid email address.
You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? * Conflicting interests help

Close Conflicting interests help

Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response. Please also list any non-financial associations or interests (personal, professional, political, institutional, religious or other) that a reasonable reader would want to know about in relation to the submitted work. This pertains to all the authors of the piece, their spouses or partners.