Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T17:39:46.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DYNAMIC PANEL ANDERSON-HSIAO ESTIMATION WITH ROOTS NEAR UNITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2015

PETER C. B. PHILLIPS*
Affiliation:
Yale University, University of Auckland, Singapore Management University & University of Southampton
*
*Address correspondence to Peter C.B.Philips, Professor of Economics, Yale University, Box. 208281, New Haven, CA, USA; e-mail: peter.phillips@yale.edu.

Abstract

Limit theory is developed for the dynamic panel IV estimator in the presence of an autoregressive root near unity. In the unit root case, Anderson–Hsiao lagged variable instruments satisfy orthogonality conditions but are well known to be irrelevant. For a fixed time series sample size (T) IV is inconsistent and approaches a shifted Cauchy-distributed random variate as the cross-section sample size n → ∞. But when T → ∞, either for fixed n or as n → ∞, IV is $\sqrt T$ consistent and its limit distribution is a ratio of random variables that converges to twice a standard Cauchy as n → ∞. In this case, the usual instruments are uncorrelated with the regressor but irrelevance does not prevent consistent estimation. The same Cauchy limit theory holds sequentially and jointly as (n, T) → ∞ with no restriction on the divergence rates of n and T. When the common autoregressive root $\rho = 1 + c/\sqrt T$ the panel comprises a collection of mildly integrated time series. In this case, the IV estimator is $\sqrt n$ consistent for fixed T and $\sqrt {nT}$ consistent with limit distribution N (0, 4) when (n, T) → ∞ sequentially or jointly. These results are robust for common roots of the form ρ = 1+c/Tγ for all γ ∈ (0, 1) and joint convergence holds. Limit normality holds but the variance changes when γ = 1. When γ > 1 joint convergence fails and sequential limits differ with different rates of convergence. These findings reveal the fragility of conventional Gaussian IV asymptotics to persistence in dynamic panel regressions.

Type
ARTICLES
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper originated in a Yale take home examination (Phillips, 2013). Some of the results were presented at a Conference in honor of Richard J. Smith’s 65th birthday at Cambridge University in May, 2014. The author acknowledges helpful comments from the referees and support from the NSF under Grant No. SES 12-58258.

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, T.W. & Hsiao, C. (1981) Estimation of dynamic models with error components. Journal of the American Statistical Association 76, 598606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, T.W. & Hsiao, C. (1982) Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data. Journal of Econometrics 18, 4782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blundell, R. & Bond, S. (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 87, 115143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, J. & Kuersteiner, G. (2002) Asymptotically unbiased inference for a dynamic panel model with fixed effects when both N and T are large Econometrica 70, 16391657.Google Scholar
Han, C. & Phillips, P.C.B. (2013) First Difference MLE and Dynamic Panel Estimation. Journal of Econometrics 175, 3545.Google Scholar
Han, C., Phillips, P.C.B. & Sul, D., (2014) X-Differencing and Dynamic Panel Model Estimation. Econometric Theory 30, 201251.Google Scholar
Kruiniger, H. (2009) GMM Estimation of Dynamic Panel Data Models with Persistent Data. Econometric Theory 25, 13481391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magdalinos, T. & Phillips, P.C.B. (2009) Limit theory for cointegrated systems with moderately integrated and moderately explosive regressors 25, 482–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, H.R. & Phillips, P.C.B. (2004) GMM Estimation of Autoregressive Roots Near Unity with Panel Data. Econometrica 72, 467522.Google Scholar
Phillips, P.C.B. (1987a) Time Series Regression with a Unit Root. Econometrica 55, 277302.Google Scholar
Phillips, P.C.B. (1987b) Towards a Unified Asymptotic Theory for Autoregression. Biometrika 74, 535547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, P.C.B. (1989) Partially identified econometric models. Econometric Theory 5, 181240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, P.C.B. (2013) Econometrics IV: Take Home Examination, Yale University (http://korora.econ.yale.edu/phillips/teach/ex/553a-ex13.pdf).Google Scholar
Phillips, P.C.B. (2016) Online Supplement to ‘Dynamic Panel Anderson-Hsiao Estimation with Roots Near Unity’, Cowles Foundation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Phillips, P.C.B. & Han, C. (2015) Distributions of FDLS and Anderson Hsiao Estimators. Economics Letters Vol. 127, 2015, 8992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, P.C.B. & Hansen, B.E. (1990) Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes Review of Economic Studies 57, 99125.Google Scholar
Phillips, P.C.B. & Magdalinos, T. (2007) Limit Theory for Moderate Deviations from a Unit Root. Journal of Econometrics 136, 115130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, P.C.B. & Moon, H.R. (1999) Linear Regression Limit Theory for Nonstationary Panel Data. Econometrica 67, 10571111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiu, Yinjia (Jeff) (2014) Take Home Examination Solution to Phillips (2013).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Phillips supplementary material

Phillips supplementary material 1

Download Phillips supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 196.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Phillips supplementary material

Phillips supplementary material 2

Download Phillips supplementary material(File)
File 64.5 KB