Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-r5d9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-15T15:19:31.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LOCAL INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE METHOD FOR THEGENERALIZED ADDITIVE-INTERACTIVE NONLINEARVOLATILITY MODEL ESTIMATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2012

Michael Levine  and
Jinguang Li
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article we consider a new separablenonparametric volatility model that includessecond-order interaction terms in both mean andconditional variance functions. This is a veryflexible nonparametric ARCH model that canpotentially explain the behavior of the wide varietyof financial assets. The model is estimated usingthe generalized version of the local instrumentalvariable estimation method first introduced in Kimand Linton (2004, Econometric Theory20, 1094–1139). This method is computationally moreeffective than most other nonparametric estimationmethods that can potentially be used to estimatecomponents of such a model. Asymptotic behavior ofthe resulting estimators is investigated and theirasymptotic normality is established. Explicitexpressions for asymptotic means and variances ofthese estimators are also obtained.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , June 2012 , pp. 629 - 669
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Ango Nze, P. (1992) Criteres d’ergodicite de quelques modeles a representation markovenne. Les Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences Paris 315(1), 1301–1304.Google Scholar
Auestad, B. & Tjostheim, D. (1990) Identification of nonlinear time series: First order characterization and order estimation. Biometrika 77, 669–687.Google Scholar
Bera, A.K. & Lee, S. (1990) On the Formulation of a General Structure for Conditional Heteroskedasticity. Mimeo, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Black, F. (1976) Studies in stock price volatility changes. Proceedings of the 1976 Meeting of the Business and Economic Statistics Section, pp. 177–181. American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
Bollerslev, T. (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics 31, 307–327.Google Scholar
Breiman, L. & Friedman, J.H. (1985) Estimating optimal transformations for multiple regression and correlation (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association 80, 580–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buja, A., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (1989) Linear smoothers and additive models (with discussion). Annals of Statistics 17, 453–555.Google Scholar
Engle, R.F. (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica 50(4), 987–1007.Google Scholar
Engle, R.F. & Ng, V.K., (1993) Measuring and testing the impact of news on volatility. The Journal of Finance 48(5), 1749–1778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, J. & Yao, Q. (2003) Nonlinear Time Series: Nonparametric and Parametric Methods. Springer.Google Scholar
Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. (1987) Generalized additive models: Some applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association 82, 371–386.Google Scholar
Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. (1990) Generalized Additive Models. Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Kim, W. & Linton, O.B. (2004) The LIVE method for generalized additive volatility models. Econometric Theory 20(6), 1094–1139.Google Scholar
Li, Q., Hsiao, C., & Zinn, J. (2003) Consistent specification test for semiparametric/nonparametric models based on series estimation methods. Journal of Econometrics 112, 295–325.Google Scholar
Linton, O.B. & Nielsen, J. (1995) A kernel method of estimating structured nonparametric regression based on marginal integration. Biometrika 82, 93–100.Google Scholar
Lu, Z. & Jiang, Z. (2001) L1 geometric ergodicity of a multivariate nonlinear AR model with an ARCH term. Statistics & Probability Letters 51, 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masry, E. (1996a) Multivariate local polynomial regression for time series: Uniform strong consistency and rates. Journal of Time Series Analysis 17, 571–599.Google Scholar
Masry, E. (1996b) Multivariate regression estimation: Local polynomial fitting for time series. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 65, 81–101.Google Scholar
Newey, W.K. (1994) Kernel estimation of partial means. Econometric Theory 10, 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagan, A.R. & Hong, Y.S. (1991) Nonparametric estimation and the risk premium. In Barnett, W., Powell, J., & Tauchen, G.E. (eds.), Nonparametric and Semiparametric Methods in Econometrics and Statistics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pagan, A.R. & Schwert, G.W. (1990) Alternative models for conditional stock volatility. Journal of Econometrics 45, 267–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rio, E. (1993) Covariance inequalities for strongly mixing processes. Annales de l’institut Henri Poincaré (B) Probabilités et Statistiques 29(4), 587–597.Google Scholar
Sentana, E. (1995) Quadratic ARCH models. Review of Economic Studies 62, 639–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperlich, S., Tjostheim, D., & Yang, L. (2002) Nonparametric estimation and testing of interaction in additive models. Econometric Theory 18, 197–251.Google Scholar
Stone, C.J. (1994) The use of polynomial splines and their tensor products in multivariate function estimation (with discussion). Annals of Statistics 22, 118–184.Google Scholar
Tjostheim, D. & Auestad, B. (1994) Nonparametric identification of nonlinear time series: Projections. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89, 1398–1409.Google Scholar
Wand, M.P. & Jones, M.C. (1995) Kernel Smoothing. Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Yang, L., Härdle, W., & Nielsen, J.P. (1999) Nonparametric autoregression with multiplicative volatility and additive mean. Journal of Time Series Analysis 20, 579–604.Google Scholar