Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

REVISING BELIEFS IN NONIDENTIFIED MODELS

  • Dale J. Poirier (a1)
    • Published online: 01 August 1998
Abstract

A Bayesian analysis of a nonidentified model is always possible if a proper prior on all the parameters is specified. There is, however, no Bayesian free lunch. The “price” is that there exist quantities about which the data are uninformative, i.e., their marginal prior and posterior distributions are identical. In the case of improper priors the analysis is problematic—resulting posteriors can be improper. This study investigates both proper and improper cases through a series of examples.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address correspondence to: Dale J. Poirier, Department of Economics, University of Toronto, 150 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G7, Canada; e-mail: poirier@chass.utoronto.ca.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Econometric Theory
  • ISSN: 0266-4666
  • EISSN: 1469-4360
  • URL: /core/journals/econometric-theory
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 24 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 84 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 29th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Errata