Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Semi-automatic ESOL error annotation

  • Øistein E. Andersen (a1)
Abstract

Manual error annotation of learner corpora is time-consuming and error-prone, whereas existing automatic techniques cannot reliably detect and correct all types of error. This paper shows that the two methods can successfully complement each other: automatic detection and partial correction of trivial errors relieves the human annotator from the laborious task of incessantly marking up oft-committed mistakes and enables him or her to focus on errors which cannot or cannot yet be handled mechanically, thus enabling more consistent annotation with considerably less manual time and effort expended.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Semi-automatic ESOL error annotation
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Semi-automatic ESOL error annotation
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Semi-automatic ESOL error annotation
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Andreu Andrés, M. A., Guardiola, A. A., Matarredona, M. B., MacDonald, P., Fleta, B. M. & Pérez Sabater, C. (2010). ‘Analysing EFL learner output in the MiLC Project: An error *it's, but which tag?’ In Campoy-Cubillo, M. C., Bellés-Fortuño, B. & Gea-Valor, M. L., Corpus-based approaches to English language teaching. London: Continuum, 167179.
Briscoe, E. J., Carroll, J. & Watson, R. (2006). ‘The second release of the RASP system’. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL 2006 Interactive Presentation Sessions. Sydney, Australia, 7780.
Cook, V. & Bassetti, B. (2005). Second Language Writing Systems, volume 11 of Second Language Acquisition. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon.
Dagneaux, E., Denness, S. & Granger, S. (1998). ‘Computer-aided error analysis’. System: The International Journal of Educational Technology and Language Learning Systems. 26.2, 163174.
Deorowicz, S. & Ciura, M. G. (2005). ‘Correcting spelling errors by modelling their causes’. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science. 15.2, 275285.
[Gui, S.] & [Yang, H.] (2002). [Chinese Learner English Corpus]. [Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press], Shanghai, China.
Hashemi, S. S., Cooper, R. & Andersson, R. (2003). ‘Positive grammar checking: A finite state approach’. In Gelbukh, A. F. (ed.), Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing: 4th International Conference, CICLing 2003, Mexico City, Mexico, February 16–22, 2003, Proceedings. 635–646.
Izumu, E., Uchimoto, K. & Isahara, H. (2004). ‘SST speech corpus of Japanese learners’ English and automatic detection of learners’ errors’, ICAME Journal, 28, 3148.
Kies, D. (2008). ‘Evaluating grammar checkers: A comparative ten-year study’. Presented at the 6th International Conference on Education and Information Systems, Technologies and Applications (EISTA), Orlando, United States. <http://papyr.com/hypertextbooks/grammar/gramchek.htm>.
Kohut, G. F. & Gorman, K. J. (1995). ‘The effectiveness of leading grammar/style software packages in analysing business students’ writing’. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 9.3, 341361.
Leacock, C., Chodorow, M., Gamon, M. & Tetreault, J. (2010). Automated Grammatical Error Detection for Language Learners. Morgan & Claypool: San Rafael, California, USA.
Liou, H.-C. (1991). ‘Development of an English grammar checker: A progress report’. CALICO Journal, 9.1, 5770.
MacDonald Lightbound, P. (2005). An analysis of interlanguage errors in synchronous/asynchronous intercultural communication exchanges. Ph.D. thesis, Universitat de Valéncia.
Nicholls, D. (2003). ‘The Cambridge Learner Corpus: Error coding and analysis for lexicography and ELT’. In Archer, D., Rayson, P., Wilson, A. & McEnery, T. (eds), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics conference, volume 16 of University Centre For Computer Corpus Research on Lanugage, Lancaster University, Technical Papers. Lancaster, 572581.
Tetreault, J. R. & Chodorow, M. (2008). ‘The ups and downs of preposition error detection in ESL writing’. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Manchester, 865872.
Wible, D., Kuo, Ch.-H., Yi, Ch. F., Liu, A. & Tsao, N.-L. (2001). ‘A Web-based EFL writing environment: Integrating information for learners, teachers and researchers’. Computers & Education, 37.3–4, 297315.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

English Profile Journal
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2041-5362
  • URL: /core/journals/english-profile-journal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 11
Total number of PDF views: 106 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 147 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.