Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-jqctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-23T06:35:46.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Robber Barons Redux: Antimonopoly Reconsidered

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

Richard R. John*
Columbia University, New York, NY. E-mail:


The antimonopoly critique of big business that flourished in the United States during the 1880s is a neglected chapter in the history of American reform. In this essay, a revised version of Richard R. John's 2011 Business History Conference presidential address, John shows how this critique found expression in a gallery of influential cartoons that ran in the New York City–based satirical magazines Puck and Judge. Among the topics that the cartoonists featured was the manipulation of the nation's financial markets by financier Jay Gould.

Copyright © The Author(s) 2012. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Bibliography of Works Cited


Bensel, Richard Franklin. The Political Economy of American Industrialization, 1877–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Berk, Gerald. Louis D. Brandeis and the Making of Regulated Competition, 1900–1932. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Bishop, Joseph Bucklin. Our Political Drama: Conventions, Campaigns, Candidates. New York: Scott-Thaw, 1904.Google Scholar
Carey, James W. Communications as Culture: Essays on Media and Society. Winchester, MA: Unwin Hyman, 1989.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr. Henry Varnum Poor: Business Analyst, Editor, and Reformer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Dewey, Donald. The Art of Ill Will: The Story of American Political Cartoons. New York: New York University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Dorfman, Joseph. The Economic Mind in American Civilization, 1865–1918. New York: Viking Press, 1949.Google Scholar
Dunlavy, Colleen A. Politics and Industrialization: Early Railroads in the United States and Prussia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Folsom, Burton W. Jr. The Myth of the Robber Barons: A New Look at the Rise of Big Business in America, 3rd ed. Herndon, VA: Young America’s Foundation, 1996.Google Scholar
Freyer, Tony A. Antitrust and Global Capitalism, 1930–2004. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Galambos, Louis. The Public Image of Big Business in America, 1880–1940: A Quantitative Study in Social Change. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Hess, Stephen, and Northrop, Sandy. Drawn and Quartered: A History of American Political Cartoons. Montgomery, AL: Elliot & Clark, 1997.Google Scholar
John, Richard R. Network Nation: Inventing American Telecommunications. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
John, Richard R, ed. Ruling Passions: Political Economy in Nineteenth Century America. University Park, TX: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Josephson, Matthew. The Robber Barons: The Great American Capitalists, 1861–1901. Orlando, FL: Harcourt, 1962 [1934].Google Scholar
Kirkland, Edward Chase. Charles Francis Adams, Jr.: The Patrician at Bay, 1835–1915. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Kirkland, Edward Chase. Men, Cities, and Transportation: A Study in New England History, 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1948.Google Scholar
Klein, Maury. The Life and Legend of Jay Gould. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Laird, Pamela Walker. Advertising Progress: American Business and the Rise of Consumer Marketing. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi R. The Great Merger Movement in American Business, 1895–1904. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Latham, Earl, ed. John D. Rockefeller: Robber Baron or Industrial Statesman? Boston: D.C. Heath and Company, 1949.Google Scholar
Licht, Walter. Industrializing America: The Nineteenth Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
McCraw, Thomas K. Prophets of Regulation: Charles Francis Adams, Louis D. Brandeis, James M. Landis, Alfred E. Kahn. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. Principles of Political Economy. Boston: Charles C. Little & James Brown, 1848.Google Scholar
Mott, Frank Luther. A History of American Magazines: Vol. 3, 1865–1885. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1938.Google Scholar
Orbanes, Philip E. Monopoly: The World’s Most Famous Game and How It Got That Way. New York: Da Capo Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Postel, Charles. The Populist Vision. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Stiles, T.J., The First Tycoon: Cornelius Vanderbilt. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2009.Google Scholar
Thompson, Robert Luther.Wiring a Continent: The History of the Telegraph Industry in the United States, 1832–1866. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Usselman, Steven W. Regulating Railroad Innovation: Business, Technology, and Politics in America, 1840–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Wells, Wyatt. Antitrust and the Formation of the Postwar World. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
West, Richard Samuel. Satire on Stone: The Political Cartoons of Joseph Keppler. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1988.Google Scholar
White, Richard. Railroaded: The Transcontinentals and the Making of Modern America. New York: W.W. Norton & Co, 2011.Google Scholar
Zunz, Olivier. Making America Corporate, 1870–1920. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Articles and Essays

Bridges, Hal. “The Robber Baron Concept in American History.” Business History Review 32 (Spring 1958): 113.Google Scholar
Chalmers, DavidFrom Robber Barons to Industrial Statesmen: Standard Oil and the Business Historians.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 20 (October 1960): 4758.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr.Comparative Business History.” In Enterprise and History, edited by Coleman, D.C. and Mathias, Peter, 326. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Culbertson, Tom. “The Golden Age of American Political Cartoons.Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 7 (July 2008): 277–95.Google Scholar
Du, Boff, Richard, B., and Herman, Edward S. “Alfred Chandler’s New Business History: A Review.” Politics and Society 10 (1980): 87110.Google Scholar
Dunlavy, Colleen A. “From Citizens to Plutocrats: Nineteenth-Century Shareholder Voting Rights and Theories of the Corporation.” In Constructing Corporate America: History, Politics, Culture, edited by Lipartito, Kenneth and Sicilia, David, 6693. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Dunlavy, Colleen A., and Welskopp, Thomas. “Peculiarities and Myths: Comparing U.S. and German Capitalism.” German Historical Institute Bulletin 41 (Fall 2007): 3364.Google Scholar
Galambos, Louis. “Technology, Political Economy, and Professionalization: Central Themes of the Organizational Synthesis.” Business History Review 57 (Winter 1983): 471–93.Google Scholar
Galambos, Louis. “The Emerging Organizational Synthesis in American History.” Business History Review 44 (1970): 279–90.Google Scholar
John, Richard R. “Communications Networks in the United States from Chappe to Marconi.” In Media History and the Foundations of Media Studies, edited by Nerone, John. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012, forthcoming.Google Scholar
John, Richard R. “Elaborations, Revisions, Dissents: Alfred D. Chandler’s, The Visible Hand after Twenty Years.” Business History Review 71 (Summer 1997): 151200.Google Scholar
John, Richard R. “Farewell to the ‘Party Period’: Political Economy in Nineteenth-Century America.” Journal of Policy History 16, no. 2 (2004): 117–25.Google Scholar
John, Richard R. “Governmental Institutions as Agents of Change: Rethinking American Political Development in the Early Republic, 1787–1835.” Studies in American Political Development 11 (Fall 1997): 347–80.Google Scholar
John, Richard R. “Ruling Passions: Political Economy in Nineteenth–Century America.” Journal of Policy History 18, no. 1 (2006): 120.Google Scholar
John, Richard R. “Telecommunications.” Enterprise and Society 9 (September 2008): 507–20.Google Scholar
John, Richard R. “Turner, Beard, Chandler: Progressive Historians.” Business History Review 82 (Summer 2008): 227–40.Google Scholar
John, Richard R. “Who Were the Gilders? And Other Seldom-Asked Questions about Business, Technology, and Political Economy in the United States, 1877–1900.” Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 8 (October 2009): 474–80.Google Scholar
Kemnitz, Thomas Milton. “The Cartoon as a Historical Source.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 4 (Summer 1973): 8193.Google Scholar
Lipartito, Kenneth. “The Utopian Corporation.” In Constructing Corporate America: History, Politics, Culture, edited by Lipartito, Kenneth and Sicilia, David B., 94119. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. “Bringing the State Back in: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research.” In Bringing the State Back In, edited by Evans, Peter B., Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda, 337. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Thomas, Samuel J. “Mugwump Cartoonists, the Papacy, and Tammany Hall in America’s Gilded Age.” Religion and American Culture 14 (Summer 2004): 213–50.Google Scholar
Thomas, Samuel J. “Teaching America’s GAPE (or Any Other Period) with Political Cartoons: A Systematic Approach to Primary Source Analysis.” History Teacher 37 (August 2004): 425–6.Google Scholar
Winner, Langdon. “Do Artifacts Have Politics?Daedalus 109 (Winter 1980): 121–36.Google Scholar
Wrege, Charles D., and Sorbo, Guidon A. Jr., “A Bridge Builder Changes a Railroad: The Story of Daniel Craig McCallum.” Canal History and Technology Proceedings 24 (2005): 183218.Google Scholar

Magazines and Newspapers

Collier’s, 1905 Google Scholar
Harper’s Weekly, 1865–1900.Google Scholar
Judge, 1881–1900.Google Scholar
Nation, 1865–1900.Google Scholar
New York Times, 1850–1900.Google Scholar
Portland Oregon Journal, 1913.Google Scholar
Puck, 1877–1900.Google Scholar
Review of Reviews, 1919.Google Scholar
The Daily Graphic: An Illustrated Evening Newspaper [New York], 1873–1889.Google Scholar
Wasp, 1876–1900.Google Scholar

On-Line Cartoon Libraries

Mark, Aldrich. “Railroad Cartoons.” Google Scholar
National Humanities Center. “The Image of the Octopus: Six Cartoons 1882–1909.” Google Scholar
Terry, Cox. “Known Lithographic Caricatures of Major Nineteenth-Century Millionaires.” Google Scholar