Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Context and Contingency: Explaining State Ownership in Norway

  • EINAR LIE (a1)

At the present time, the Norwegian state owns a large number of business enterprises. The state controls around 35 percent of the total values on the Oslo Stock Exchange, and five of the seven largest listed companies are partially owned by the state, ranging from 34 to 64 percent. This article traces the background of state ownership from the formative phase of state involvement in the modern economy, and it demonstrates how this ownership provided growth in state enterprises after 1945. The broad support for large state enterprises is explained by ongoing national, political, social, and economic contexts. There is a high level of trust in the state, which is perceived as a protector of common interests. Broad support is also based on the fact that there is a lack of private investors and a strong inclination to restrict foreign influence in the domestic economy.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Peter A. Hall , and David Soskice . Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

Einar Lie , and Christian Venneslan . Over evne: Finansdepartementet 1965–1992: Oslo: Pax forlag, 2010.

Robert Millward . Private and Public Enterprise in Europe: Energy, Telecommunications and Transport, 1830–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Pier Angelo Toninelli . The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprise in the Western World. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Kristin Asdal , and Ingunn Moser . “Experiments in Context and Contexting.” Science, Technology & Human Values 37, no. 4 (2012): 291306.

Shaun Bowler , and Jeffrey A. Karp . “Politicians, Scandals, and Trust in Government.” Political Behavior 26, no. 3 (2004): 271287.

Even Lange . “The Concession Laws of 1906–09 and Norwegian Industrial Development.” Scandinavian Journal of History 2, no. 1–4 (1977): 311330.

Einar Lie . “Market Power and Market Failure: The Decline of the European Fertilizer Industry and the Expansion of Norsk Hydro.” Enterprise and Society 9, no. 1 (2008): 7095.

Kenneth Lipartito . “Connecting the Cultural and the Material in Business History.” Enterprise and Society 14, no. 4 (2013): 686704.

Per Arnt Pettersen , Anders Todal Jenssen , and Ola Listhaug . “The 1994 EU Referendum in Norway: Continuity and Change.” Scandinavian Political Studies 19, no. 3 (1996): 257281.

Kristina Spohr Readman . “Contemporary History in Europe: From Mastering National Pasts to the Future of Writing the World.” Journal of Contemporary History, 46, no. 3 (2011): 506530.

Henry Valen . “National Conflict Structure and Foreign Politics: The Impact of the EEC Issue on Perceived Cleavages in Nowegian Politics.” European Journal of Political Research 4, no. 1 (1976): 4782.

Steven Van de Walle , Steven Van Roosbroek , and Geert Bouckaert . “Trust in the Public Sector: Is There Any Evidence for a Long-Term Decline?” International Review of Administrative Sciences 74, no. 1 (2008): 4764.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Enterprise & Society
  • ISSN: 1467-2227
  • EISSN: 1467-2235
  • URL: /core/journals/enterprise-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 61 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 302 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.