Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T09:44:50.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of crossability between triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack) and common wheat, durum wheat and rye

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2008

Melissa J. Hills ,
Linda M. Hall ,
Doug F. Messenger ,
Robert J. Graf ,
Brian L. Beres  and
François Eudes
Melissa J. Hills
Affiliation:
Alberta Agriculture and Food/University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada Grant MacEwen College, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Linda M. Hall
Affiliation:
Alberta Agriculture and Food/University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
Doug F. Messenger
Affiliation:
Agriculture and AgriFood Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
Robert J. Graf
Affiliation:
Agriculture and AgriFood Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
Brian L. Beres
Affiliation:
Agriculture and AgriFood Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
François Eudes
Affiliation:
Agriculture and AgriFood Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Development of transgenic triticale as a platform for novel bio-industrial products is predicated on an environmental biosafety assessment that quantifies the potential risks associated with its release. Pollen-mediated gene flow to related species and conventional triticale varieties is one pathway for transgene movement. A tier 1 quantification of triticale hybridization was conducted by emasculating and hand pollinating flowers under greenhouse conditions. Approximately 2000 manual pollinations were conducted for each cross and its reciprocal between two triticale genotypes: a modern triticale cultivar (AC Alta) and primary triticale (89TT108), and common wheat, durum wheat and rye. The frequency of outcrossing, hybrid seed appearance and weight, and F1 emergence and fertility were recorded. Outcrossing, F1 emergence and fertility rates were high from crosses between triticale genotypes. Outcrossing in inter-specific crosses was influenced by the species, and the genotype and gender of the triticale parent. In crosses to common and durum wheat where triticale was the male parent, outcrossing was ≥73.0% and ≥69.5%, respectively, but ≤23.9% and ≤3.0% when triticale was the female parent. Overall, outcrossing with rye was lower than with common and durum wheat. F1 hybrid emergence was greater when triticale was the female parent. With the exception of a single seed, all wheat-triticale F1 hybrid seeds were non-viable when triticale was the male parent in the cross. Only seven durum wheat-triticale F1 hybrids emerged from 163 seeds sown, and all were produced with triticale 89TT108 as female parent. With rye, 8 F1 hybrids emerged from 38 seeds sown, and all were produced from crosses to AC Alta; five with AC Alta as the female parent and three as the male. Interspecific F1 hybrids were self-sterile, with the exception of those produced in crosses between common wheat and triticale where triticale was the female parent. Tier 2 hybridization quantification will be conducted under field conditions.

Keywords

triticaleoutcrossingrisk assessmentbiosafetyhybridizationryewheatcrossability
Type
Research Article
Information
Environmental Biosafety Research , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , October 2007 , pp. 249 - 257
Copyright
© ISBR, EDP Sciences, 2008

References

Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development (2005) Triticale production and utilization manual
Allen RE (1980) Wheat. In Fehr WR, Hadley HH, eds, Crop Hybridization. American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, Chapter 51
Bizimungu B, Collin J, Comeau A, St-Pierre CA (1998) Hybrid necrosis as a barrier to gene transfer in hexaploid winter wheat $\times$ triticale crosses. Can. J. Plant Sci. 78: 239–244
Boodley JW, Sheldrak R (1977) Cornell peat - lite mixes for commercial plant growing. Cornell Plant Sci. info. Bulletin 43
Chaubey NK, Khanna VK (1986) A study of crossability between wheat, triticale and rye. Curr. Sci. 55: 744–745
Gonzalez JM, Muniz LM, Jouve N (2005) Mapping of QTLs for androgenetic response based on a molecular genetic map of X Triticosecale Wittmack. Genome 48: 999–1009
Green K (2007) Bettering triticale. Res. Dev. Spring
Guedes-Pinto H, Lima-Brito J, Ribeiro-Carvalho C, Gustafson JP (2001) Genetic control of crossability of triticale with rye. Plant Breed. 120: 27–31
Kapila RK, Sethi GS (1993) Genotype and age effect on in-vitro embryo rescue of bread wheat-x-hexaploid triticale hybrids. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 35: 287–291
Khanna VK (1990) Germination, pollen fertility and crossability between triticale and wheat and reversion patterns in early segregating generations. Cereal Res. Commun. 18: 359–362
Kuleung C, Baenziger PS, Kachman SD, Dweikat I (2006) Evaluating the genetic diversity of triticale with wheat and rye SSR markers. Crop Sci. 46: 1692–1700
Lelley T (1992) Triticale, still a promise. Plant Breed. 109: 1–17
Lima-Brito J, Guedes-Pinto H (1998) Crossability between tritordeum and triticale. Euphytica 104: 107–111
Matus-Cadiz MA, Hucl P, Dupuis B (2007) Pollen-mediated gene flow in wheat at the commercial scale. Crop Sci. 47: 573–581
Nadolska-Orczyk A, Przetakiewicz A, Kopera K, Binka A, Orczyk W (2005) Efficient method of agrobacterium-mediated transformation for triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack). J. Plant Growth Regul. 24: 2–10
Nkongolo KKC, Stpierre CA, Comeau A (1991) Effect of parental genotypes, cross direction and temperature on the crossability of bread wheat with triticale and on the viability of F1 embryos. Ann. Appl. Biol. 118: 161–168
Oettler G, Burger H, Melchinger AE (2003) Heterosis and combining ability for grain yield and other agronomic traits in winter triticale. Plant Breed. 122: 318–321
Oettler G, Tams SH, Utz HF, Bauer E, Melchinger AE (2005) Prospects for hybrid breeding in winter triticale: I. Heterosis and combining ability for agronomic traits in European elite germplasm. Crop Sci. 45: 1476–1482
Plochl M, Heiermann M (2006) Biogas farming in central and northern Europe: a strategy for developing countries? Agr. Eng. Int. VIII
Raybould A, Cooper I (2005) Tiered tests to assess the environmental risk of fitness changes in hybrids between transgenic crops and wild relatives: the example of virus resistant Brassica napus. Environ. Biosafety Res. 4: 127–140
Rosenberger A (2005) Identification of top-performing cereal cultivars for grain-to-ethanol operations. Zuckerindustrie 130: 697–701
Rosenberger A, Kaul HP, Senn T, Aufhammer W (2002) Costs of bioethanol production from winter cereals: the effect of growing conditions and crop production intensity levels. Ind. Crop Prod. 15: 91–102
Tams SH, Bauer E, Oettler G, Melchinger AE (2004) Genetic diversity in European winter triticale determined with SSR markers and coancestry coefficient. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108: 1385–1391
Tams SH, Melchinger AE, Bauer E (2005) Genetic similarity among European winter triticale elite germplasms assessed with AFLP and comparisons with SSR and pedigree data. Plant Breed. 124: 154–160
Wang S, Thomas KC, Ingledew WM, Sosulski K, Sosulski FW (1997) Rye and triticale as feedstock for fuel ethanol production. Cereal Chem. 74: 621–625
Yeung KC, Larter EN (1972) Pollen production and disseminating properties of triticale relative to wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 52: 569–574
Zhang LY, Bernard M, Leroy P, Feuillet C, Sourdille P (2005) High transferability of bread wheat EST-derived SSRs to other cereals. Theor. Appl. Genet. 111: 677–687
Zimny J, Becker D, Brettschneider R, Lorz H (1995) Fertile, transgenic triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack). Mol. Breed. 1: 155–164