Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T10:45:20.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transgenes and national boundaries – The need for international regulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2009

Muthukumar Bagavathiannan
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, R3T 2N2, Canada
Rene Van Acker
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, The University of Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

What happens when one nation cultivates a transgenic crop variety but neighboring nations do not? Using alfalfa as a case study, we argue that the potential for international transgene flow is substantial, and therefore, the need for international cooperation in regulatory decisions concerning transgenic crops is imperative. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa, L.) is the major forage crop in North America. Recently, genetically modified (GM) alfalfa received a moratorium on further cultivation in the US on the grounds that the approvals were based on inadequate environmental impact assessments. With their deep root system, symbiotic nitrogen fixation, prolific seed production and prolonged dormancy, alfalfa plants are capable of establishing self-perpetuating (feral) populations in unmanaged environments. Given what is known about alfalfa pollen dispersal, such feral populations could facilitate gene flow between GM and non-GM fields. The border between the US and Canada, particularly in farming areas, is very narrow (< 10 m wide). We surveyed along the US-Canada border and found both alfalfa fields and potentially feral alfalfa plants in the ditches along the border. Our survey results provide evidence of the possibility of cross-border transgene flow, suggesting a need for international co-operative risk assessment initiatives between the US and Canada. Such situations could occur for other crops, in other international border regions as well.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© ISBR, EDP Sciences, 2009

References

Agbios (2008) Global status of approved genetically modified plants. http://www.agbios.com/dbase.php?action=Synopsis
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) (2008) States and counties in which Roundup Ready alfalfa is produced. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/alfalfa_locations.shtml
Bagavathiannan, M, Van Acker R (2008) Crop ferality: Implications for novel trait confinement. Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 127: 16 CrossRef
Bagavathiannan, M, Van Acker R (2009) Ecology and biology of feral alfalfa (Medicago sativa, L.) and its implications for novel trait confinement. Cri. Rev. Pl. Sci. 28: 6987 CrossRef
Bagavathiannan M, Julier B, Barre P, Van Acker R (2008) Estimation of genetic diversities among different feral alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) populations occurring in Southern Manitoba, Canada using SSR markers. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Canadian Weed Science Society, Banff, Alberta, Canada
Bagavathiannan M, Gulden R, Begg G, Van Acker R (2009) The demography of feral alfalfa (Medicago sativa, L.) populations occurring in Southern Manitoba, Canada. Proceedings of the Weed Science Society of America Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL, USA
Chen Z, Qu L (2008) The status of agriculture biotechnology in China. http://www.gmo-safety.eu/pdf/biosafenet/Zhang-Liang.pdf
Fitzpatrick S, Reisen P, McCaslin M (2003) Pollen-mediated gene flow in alfalfa: A three-year summary of field research. Proceedings of the 2003 central alfalfa improvement conference, virtual meeting July 21–25, 2003. http://www.naaic.org/meetings/central2003/Gene-flow_in_Alfalfa_Abstract_final.doc
Fox, J (2007) US courts thwart GM alfalfa and turf grass. Nat. Biotech. 25: 367 CrossRef
International Boundary Commission (IBC) (2007) The international boundary between Canada and the United States. http://www.international boundary commission.org/ibcpg2.htm#contacts
International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA) (2008) Highlights of the global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/39/highlights/default.html
Putnam D (2006) Methods to enable coexistence of diverse production systems involving genetically engineered alfalfa. Agricultural Biotechnology in California Series, Publication 8193. Available at http://ucanr.org/freepubs/docs/8193.pdf
Rincker C, Marble V, Brown D, Johansen C (1988) Seed production practices. In Hanson A, Barnes D, Hill R, eds, Alfalfa and alfalfa improvement, American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Publishers, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp 985–1022
St. Amand P, Skenner D, Peaden R (2000) Risk of alfalfa transgene dissemination and scale-dependent effects. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101: 107–114
Teuber L, Van Deynze A, Mueller S, McCaslin M, Fitzpatrick S, Rogan G (2004) Gene flow in alfalfa under honey bee (Apis mellifera) pollination. http://www.foragegenetics.com/pdf/4RRANAAICAbstractTeuberGeneFlow.pdf
United States District Court (USDC) (2007a) Preliminary injunction order report from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, order No. C 06-01075 CRB, dated March 12, pp 1–15
United States District Court (USDC) (2007b) Memorandum and order re: permanent injunction report from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, order No. C 06-01075 CRB, dated May 3, pp 1–15
United States District Court (USDC) (2007c) Amended judgment report from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco division, case no. 3:06-cv-01075-CRB, dated July 23, pp 1–4
Western Organization of Resource Councils (WORC) (2005) The problem with GM alfalfa: A fact sheet. http://www.worc.org/pdfs/The Problem with GM Alfalfa.pdf