Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:54:48.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Euphrates River—an International Problem of Water Resources Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Peter Beaumont
Peter Beaumont
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer, Department of Geography, University of Durham, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham City, England.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The watershed of the River Euphrates lies within the boundaries of the present-day states of Turkey, Syria, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia. Almost 90% of the runoff from the basin is generated within the highlands of eastern Turkey as the result of snow-melt occurring during late spring and early summer. At this time, flood levels are usually reached along the whole length of the River.

The former inhabitants of the floodplain lands of Iraq utilized the waters of the River Euphrates for at least 6,000 years. By so doing, empires dependent upon irrigated agriculture flourished and then decayed, leaving behind spectacular ruins practically throughout Mesopotamia. Until the time of the Second World War, Iraq was the only country within the Euphrates basin that made large demands on the water resources of the River. Since that time, Iraq's demand has continued to increase, resulting in average water withdrawals of over 16,000 million m3/year during the 1960s. This figure represents about 45% of the average annual discharge of the Euphrates into Iraq.

Since the mid-1960s, both Syria and Turkey have planned major dam schemes to utilize the waters of the Euphrates. The Tabqa Dam in Syria, and the Keban Dam in Turkey, have already been constructed, and Turkey has planned other major hydraulic works along its section of the River. When the irrigation projects associated with these schemes are in full operation towards the end of the century, it seems that the likely demand for water will be in excess of the available flow of the River.

The country which is likely to suffer most as a result of this is Iraq, owing to its situation in the lowest part of the basin. Already, diplomatic relationships between Syria and Iraq have been severely strained as the result of disagreements about the allocation of the water resources of the River Euphrates. In future, it seems possible that such disputes will continue to occur, and perhaps also to become of increasing severity as both Turkey and Syria begin to use large proportions of the available riverflow for irrigation. The only permanent solution to the problem would seem to be the establishment of an international body to supervise the just allocation of the water resources of the Euphrates between Turkey, Syria, and Iraq. At present it seems unlikely that a lasting agreement will be reached between the three countries.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , Spring 1978 , pp. 35 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aart, Van R. (1974). Drainage and land reclamation in the lower Mesopotamia Plain. Nature and Resources, 10(2), pp. 11–7.Google Scholar
Al-Khashab, W. H. (1958). The Water Budget of the Tigri-Euphrates Basin. Department of Geography, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois: Research Paper No. 54, 105 pp.Google Scholar
Arab Report And Record (1975). Iraq-political-foreign, and Syria-political-foreign. Arab Report and Record, Issue 9, 1–15 05, pp. 276 and 289.Google Scholar
Beaumont, P., Blake, G. H. & Wagstaff, J. M. (1976). The Middle East—a Geographical Study. John Wiley, London, England: 572 pages.Google Scholar
Brawer, M. (1968). The geographical background of the Jordan water dispute. Pp. 225–42 in Essays in Political Geography, (Ed. Fisher, C. A.). Methuen, London, England: 387 pp.Google Scholar
Brichambaut, G. De Perrin & Wallen, C. C. (1963). A study of Agroclimatology in Semi-arid and Arid Zones of the Near East. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland: Technical Note No. 56, 64 pp.Google Scholar
Clawson, M., Landsberg, H. H. & Alexander, L. T. (1971). The Agricultural Potential of the Middle East. Elsevier, New York, N.Y.: 312 pp.Google Scholar
Devlet Su Isleri-Genel Müdürlügü (1970). Plan for the Development of the Water and Land Resources of the Lower Firat River Basin and the Karakaya Dam and Hydroelectric Project. Devlet Su Isleri, Ankara, Turkey: 28 pp.Google Scholar
Efrat, M. (1967). Syria's dam on the Euphrates. New Outlook, 10(4), pp. 39–46.Google Scholar
Garbrecht, G. (1968). Gediz und Euphrat als Beispiele grossraumiger Wasserwirtschaftsplanungen. Wasser and Boden, 20 Jahrgang, Heft 2, pp. 42–6.Google Scholar
General Directorate Of State Hydraulic Works, Turkey (1968). Statistical Bulletin with Maps, 1968. General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works, Ankara, Turkey: 285 pp.Google Scholar
Guiné, A. (1976). Le Barrage sur l'Euphrate. Office Arabe de Presse et de Documentation, Damascus, Syria: 38 pp.Google Scholar
Middle East Economic Digest (1976). Contract signed for dam construction. Middle East Economic Digest, London, 20(39), p. 41.Google Scholar
Ozal, K., Kutan, R. & Adak, F. (1967). Development of the Euphrates basin in Turkey—a case-study. Pp. 100–14 in Water for Peace: Vol. 6, Planning and Developing Water Programs. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.: 1,031 pp.Google Scholar
Population Reference Bureau (1976). World Population Data Sheet, 1976. Population Reference Bureau, Washington, D.C.: 1 page data-sheet.Google Scholar
Smith, C. G. (1966). The disputed waters of the Jordan. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40, pp. 111–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ubell, K. (1971). Iraq's water resources Nature and Resources, 7(2), pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
UNESCO (1971). Discharge of Selected Rivers of the World: Vol. 2, Monthly and Annual Discharges Recorded at Various Stations. Unesco, Paris: 194 pp.Google Scholar
Wittfogel, K. A. (1956). The hydraulic civilizations. Pp. 152–64 in Man's Role in Changing the Face of the Earth (Ed. Thomas, W. L.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois: 1,193 pp.Google Scholar