Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-dc8c957cd-p6nx7 Total loading time: 0.22 Render date: 2022-01-29T01:08:37.064Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Integrating Remote Sensing into Wildlife Monitoring for Conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2019

PJ Stephenson*
Affiliation:
IUCN SSC Species Monitoring Specialist Group, c/o Ecosystem Management Group, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, G73.1, Building CHN, Universitätstrasse 16, Zürich, Switzerland
*
Author for correspondence: Dr PJ Stephenson, Email: stephensonpj@gmail.com

Summary

Effective wildlife monitoring is a prerequisite for effective wildlife conservation since, without time-series data on species populations and threats, evidence-based adaptive management will be difficult to achieve. Technological advances in remote sensing offer more opportunities for data collection than ever before. However, if we are to enhance data sharing and the use of data by decision-makers, methods must be relevant to local user needs and be integrated into monitoring schemes with appropriate goals and indicators.

Type
Comment
Copyright
© Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aebischer, T, Siguindo, G, Rochat, E, Arandjelovic, M, Heilman, A, Hickisch, R et al. (2017) First quantitative survey delineates the distribution of chimpanzees in the eastern Central African Republic. Biological Conservation 213: 8494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez-Berríos, N, Campos-Cerqueira, M, Hernández-Serna, A, Delgado, CJA, Román-Dañobeytia, F, Aide, TM (2016) Impacts of small-scale gold mining on birds and anurans near the Tambopata Natural Reserve, Peru, assessed using passive acoustic monitoring. Tropical Conservation Science 9: 832851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaudrot, L, Ahumada, JA, O’Brien, T, Alvarez-Loayza, P, Boekee, K, Campos-Arceiz, A et al. (2016) Standardized assessment of biodiversity trends in tropical forest protected areas: the end is not in sight. PLoS Biology 14: e1002357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggs, J, Ewald, N, Valentini, A, Gaboriaud, C, Dejean, T, Griffiths, RA et al. (2015) Using eDNA to develop a national citizen science-based monitoring programme for the great crested newt (Triturus cristatus). Biological Conservation 183: 1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BirdLife International (2006) Monitoring Important Bird Areas: A Global Nramework. Version 1.2. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International.Google Scholar
Borges, PAV, Cardoso, P, Kreft, H, Whittaker, RJ, Fattorini, S, Emerson, BC et al. (2018) Global Island Monitoring Scheme (GIMS): a proposal for the long-term coordinated survey and monitoring of native island forest biota. Biodiversity and Conservation 27: 25672586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, GM, Fishpool, LDC, Evans, MI, Butchart, SHM (2013) Comparing field-based monitoring and remote-sensing, using deforestation from logging at Important Bird Areas as a case study. Biological Conservation 167: 334338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, KS, Gilbert, SL, Brown, CL, Hatfield, M, Hanson, L (2016) Unmanned aircraft systems in wildlife research: current and future applications of a transformative technology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14: 241251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CMP (2013) Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation, Version 3. Bethesda, MD, USA: Conservation Measures Partnership.Google Scholar
Crees, JJ, Collins, AC, Stephenson, PJ, Meredith, HMR, Young, RP, Howe, C et al. (2016) A comparative approach to assess drivers of success in mammalian conservation recovery programs. Conservation Biology 30: 694705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danielsen, F, Jensen, PM, Burgess, ND, Altamirano, R, Alviola, PA, Andrianandrasana, H et al. (2014) A multicountry assessment of tropical resource monitoring by local communities. Bioscience 64: 236251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deichmann, JL, Hernández-Serna, A, Campos-Cerqueira, M, Aide, TM (2017) Soundscape analysis and acoustic monitoring document impacts of natural gas exploration on biodiversity in a tropical forest. Ecological Indicators 74: 3948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, M, Roy, J, Vigilant, L, Fawcett, K, Basabose, A, Cranfield, M et al. (2013) Genetic census reveals increased but uneven growth of a critically endangered mountain gorilla population. Biological Conservation 158: 230238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, X, Smyth, RL, Young, BE, Brooks, TM, de Lozada, AS, Bubb, P et al. (2014) A biodiversity indicators dashboard: addressing challenges to monitoring progress towards the Aichi biodiversity targets using disaggregated global data. PLoS ONE 9: e112046.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Likens, G, Lindenmayer, D (2018) Effective Ecological Monitoring. Clayton South, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
McRae, L, Deinet, S, Freeman, R (2017) The diversity-weighted Living Planet Index: controlling for taxonomic bias in a global biodiversity indicator. PLoS ONE 12: e0169156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, AJ, Goodman, SM, Farris, ZJ, Karpanty, SM, Andrianjakarivelo, V, Kelly, MJ (2017) Landscape trends in small mammal occupancy in the Makira–Masoala protected areas, northeastern Madagascar. Journal of Mammalogy 98: 272282.Google Scholar
Navarro, LM, Fernández, N, Guerra, CA, Guralnick, R, Kissling, WD, Londoño, MC et al. (2017) Monitoring biodiversity change through effective global coordination. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 29: 158169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettorelli, N, Laurance, WF, O’Brien, TG, Wegmann, M, Nagendra, H, Turner, W (2014) Satellite remote sensing for applied ecologists: opportunities and challenges. Journal of Applied Ecology 51: 839848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rovero, F, Zimmermann, F (2016) Camera Trapping for Wildlife Research. Exeter, UK: Pelagic Publishing.Google Scholar
Schmeller, DS, Böhm, M, Arvanitidis, C, Barber-Meyer, S, Brummitt, N, Chandler, M et al. (2017) Building capacity in biodiversity monitoring at the global scale. Biodiversity and Conservation 26: 27652790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2014) Global Biodiversity Outlook 4. Montreal, Canada: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.Google Scholar
Sparks, TH, Butchart, SHM, Balmford, A, Bennun, L, Stanwell-Smith, D, Walpole, M et al. (2011) Linked indicator sets for addressing biodiversity loss. Oryx 45: 411419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, PJ, Bowles-Newark, N, Regan, E, Stanwell-Smith, D, Diagana, M, Hoft, R et al. (2017a) Unblocking the flow of biodiversity data for decision-making in Africa. Biological Conservation 213: 335340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, PJ, Brooks, TM, Butchart, SHM, Fegraus, E, Geller, GN, Hoft, R et al. (2017b) Priorities for big biodiversity data. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 15: 124125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, PJ, Burgess, ND, Jungmann, L, Loh, J, O’Connor, S, Oldfield, T et al. (2015a) Overcoming the challenges to conservation monitoring: integrating data from in situ reporting and global data sets to measure impact and performance. Biodiversity 16: 6885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, PJ, O’Connor, S, Reidhead, W, Loh, J (2015b) Using biodiversity indicators for conservation. Oryx 49: 396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thapa, GJ, Thapa, K, Thapa, R, Jnawali, SR, Wich, SA, Poudyal, LP, Karki, S (2018) Counting crocodiles from the sky: monitoring the critically endangered gharial (Gavialis gangeticus) population with an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems 6: 7182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turak, E, Regan, E, Costello, MJ (2017) Measuring and reporting biodiversity change. Biological Conservation 213: 249251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentini, A, Taberlet, P, Miaud, C, Civade, R, Herder, J, Thomsen, PF et al. (2016) Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Molecular Ecology 25: 929942.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Swaay, C, Regan, E, Ling, M, Bozhinovska, E, Fernandez, M, Marini-Filho, OJ et al. (2015) Guidelines for Standardised Global Butterfly Monitoring. GEO BON Technical Series 1. Leipzig, Germany: Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Stephenson supplementary material

Stephenson supplementary material 1

Download Stephenson supplementary material(File)
File 12 KB
12
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Integrating Remote Sensing into Wildlife Monitoring for Conservation
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Integrating Remote Sensing into Wildlife Monitoring for Conservation
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Integrating Remote Sensing into Wildlife Monitoring for Conservation
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *