Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768dbb666b-x9ds4 Total loading time: 0.525 Render date: 2023-02-05T08:04:08.954Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Representativeness of terrestrial ecosystems in Chile's protected area system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2011

PATRICIO PLISCOFF*
Affiliation:
Spatial Ecology Group, Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Switzerland
TARYN FUENTES-CASTILLO
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
*
*Correspondence: Patricio Pliscoff e-mail: patricio.pliscoff@unil.ch

Summary

Because protected areas are a major means of conservation, the extent to which ecosystems are represented under different protection regimes needs to be ascertained. A gap analysis approach was used to assess the representativeness of Chile's terrestrial ecosystems in differing kinds of protected areas. Terrestrial ecosystems were described in terms of potential vegetation, employing three protection scenarios. Scenario 1 was based exclusively on the Chilean National System of Protected Wild Areas (SNASPE). Scenario 2 included all types of public protected areas, namely SNASPE, nature sanctuaries and Ministry of National Heritage lands. Scenario 3 included all items in Scenario 2, but also included private protected areas and biodiversity priority sites. There is insufficient protection of terrestrial ecosystems under the Scenario 2. In addition to the low level of ecosystem protection provided by state protected areas (only 42 of the 127 terrestrial ecosystems had >10% of their area protected), 23 terrestrial ecosystems were identified as having no protection at the national level. Gaps in protection were concentrated in the North (both coastal and inland desertic scrub), Central (thorny scrub, thorny forests, sclerophyllous forests and deciduous coastal forests) and Austral (steppe ecosystems) regions of Chile. These gaps include ecosystems that are of global conservation importance.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arango, N., Armenteras, D., Castro, M., Gottsmann, T., Hernández, O.L., Matallana, C., Morales, M.M., Naranjo, L.G., Renjifo, L.M., Trujillo, A.F. & Villareal, H. (2003) Vacíos de conservación del Sistema de Parques Nacionales Naturales de Colombia desde una perspectiva ecoregional. Bogota, Colombia: WWF Colombia (Fondo Mundial para la Naturaleza).Google Scholar
Armenteras, D., Gast, F. & Villareal, H. (2003) Andean forest fragmentation and the representativeness of protected natural areas in the eastern Andes, Colombia. Biological Conservation 113: 245256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armesto, J., Rozzi, R., Smith-Ramírez, C. & Arroyo, M.T.K. (1998) Conservation targets in South American temperate forests. Science 282: 12711272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, J., Del Pozo, A., Ovalle, C., Avendano, J., Lavín, A. & Etienne, M. (1998) Land use changes and conflicts in central Chile. In: Landscape Degradation and Biodiversity in Mediterranean-type Ecosystems, ed. Rundel, P.W., Montenegro, G.. & Jaksic, F.M., pp. 155168. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arroyo, M.T.K. & Cavieres, L. (1997) The Mediterranean type-climate flora of central Chile. What do we know and how can we assure its protection? Noticiero de Biologia 5: 4856.Google Scholar
Arroyo, M.T.K., Marquet, P.A., Marticorena, C., Simonetti, J.A., Cavieres, L., Squeo, F. & Rozzi, R. (2004) Chilean winter rainfall. Valdivian forest. In: Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions, ed. Mittermeier, R., Robles-Gil, P., Hoffmann, M., Pilgrim, J., Brooks, T., Goettsch-Mittermeier, C., Lamoreux, J. & Fonseca, G.A.B. Da, pp. 99103. Ciudad de México, México: CEMEX.Google Scholar
Austin, M. & Margules, C. (1984) Concept of representativeness in conservation evaluation with particular relevance to Australia. Technical memorandum 84/11. CSIRO Institute of Biological Resources, Division of Water and Land Resources, Canberra, Australia: 43 pp.Google Scholar
Beaumont, L.J., Gallagher, R.V., Downey, P.O., Thuiller, W., Leishman, M.R. & Hughes, L. (2009) Modelling the impact of Hieracium spp. on protected areas in Australia under future climates. Ecography 32: 757764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, I. (1996) Representación ecológica del Sistema Nacional de Áreas Silvestres Protegidas del Estado. In: Libro rojo de los sitios prioritarios para la conservación de la diversidad biológica en Chile, ed. Muñoz, M., Nuñez, H. & Yañez, J., pp. 149159. Santiago, Chile: Corporación Nacional Forestal.Google Scholar
Brooks, T., Mittermeier, R.A., da Fonseca, G.A.B., Gerlach, J., Hoffmann, M., Lamoreux, J.F., Mittermeier, C.G., Pilgrim, J.D. & Rodrigues, A.S.L. (2006) Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313: 5861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brugiere, D. & Kormos, R. (2009) Review of the protected area network in Guinea, West Africa, and recommendations for new sites for biodiversity conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 18: 847868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, C., Dunk, J.R. & Moilanen, A.J. (2010) Optimizing resiliency of reserve networks to climate change: multi-species conservation planning in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Global Change Biology 16: 891904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CBD (2004) COP 7 decision VII/30. Strategic plan: future evaluation of progress. Goal 1: Promote the conservation of the biological diversity of ecosystems, habitats and biomes; Target 1.1 [www document]. URL http://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=7767Google Scholar
Ceballos, G., Davidson, A., List, R., Pacheco, J., Manzano-Fischer, P., Santos-Barrera, G. & Cruzado, J. (2010) Rapid decline of a grassland system and its ecological and conservation implications. PLoS ONE 5 (1): e8562 [www document]. URL http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0008562CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chape, S., Blyth, S., Fish, L., Fox, P. & Spalding, M. (2003) United Nations List of Protected Areas. Gland, Switzerland: UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre/IUCN-The World Conservation Union.Google Scholar
Chape, S., Harrison, J., Spalding, M. & Lysenko, I. (2005) Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360: 443445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CONAF, CONAMA, BIRF, Universidad Austral de Chile, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile & Universidad Católica de Temuco (1999) Catastro y Evaluación de los Recursos Vegetacionales Nativos de Chile. Informe Nacional con Variables Ambientales. Santiago, Chile: Corporación Nacional Forestal (CONAF).Google Scholar
CONAMA (2003) Estrategia Nacional de Biodiversidad. Santiago, Chile: Comisión Nacional del Medio Ambiente, Gobierno de Chile.Google Scholar
CONAMA (2005) Política Nacional de Áreas Protegidas. Santiago, Chile: Comisión Nacional del Medio Ambiente, Gobierno de Chile.Google Scholar
CONAMA-PNUD (2006) Creación de un Sistema Nacional Integral de Áreas Protegidas para Chile. GEF Full Project [www document]. URL http://www.pnud.cl/proyectos/fichas/areas-protegidas.aspGoogle Scholar
Davey, A. (1998) National System Planning for Protected Areas. Gland, Switzerland: World Conservation Union.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, R. & Czech, B. (2005) Conservation deficits for the continental United States: an ecosystem gap analysis. Conservation Biology 19: 14781487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinerstein, E.D., Olsen, M., Graham, D.J., Webster, A.L., Primm, S.A., Book-binder, M.P. & Ledec, G. (1995) A Conservation Assessment of the Terrestrial Ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, USA: World Bank, World Wide Fund for Nature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudley, N. & Parish, J. (2006) Closing the Gap. Creating Ecologically Representative Protected Area Systems: A Guide to Conducting the Gap Assessments of Protected Area Systems for the Convention on Biological Diversity. Technical Series No. 24. Montreal, Canada: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.Google Scholar
Echeverría, C., Coomes, D., Hall, M. & Newton, A. (2008) Spatially explicit models to analyze forest loss and fragmentation between 1976 and 2020 in southern Chile. Ecological Modelling 212: 439449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallo, J., Pasquini, L., Reyers, B. & Cowling, R. (2009) The role of private conservation areas in biodiversity representation and target achievement within the Little Karoo region, South Africa. Biological Conservation 142: 446454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of Chile (1970) Ley de Monumentos Nacionales. Law No.17288. Diario Oficial, 4 de Febrero 1970. Santiago, Chile: Gobierno de Chile.Google Scholar
Government of Chile (1977) Normas sobre adquisición, administración y disposición de bienes del Estado. Decree-law No.1939. Diario Oficial, 5 de Octubre 1977. Santiago, Chile: Gobierno de Chile.Google Scholar
Government of Chile (1984) Creación un Sistema Nacional de Áreas Silvestres Protegidas del Estado. Law No.18362. Diario Oficial de 27 de Noviembre 1984. Santiago, Chile: Gobierno de Chile.Google Scholar
Government of Chile (1994) Ley sobre Bases Generales del Medio Ambiente. Law No.19300. Diario Oficial, 1 de Enero 1994. Santiago, Chile: Gobierno de Chile.Google Scholar
Groves, C. (2003) Drafting a Conservation Blueprint: a Practitioner's Guide to Planning for Biodiversity. Washington, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Hannah, L. (2010) A global conservation system for climate-change adaptation. Conservation Biology 24: 7077.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodgson, J., Thomas, C.D., Wintle, B.A. & Moilanen, A. (2009) Climate change, connectivity and conservation decision making: back to basics. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 964969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, J.M., Boucher, T.M., Ricketts, T.H. & Roberts, C.,(2005) Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecology Letters 8: 2329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. & Gaston, K. (2008) Incorporating private lands in conservation planning: protected areas in Britain. Ecological Applications 18: 10501060.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jennings, M. (2000). Gap analysis: concepts, methods, and recent results. Landscape Ecology 15: 520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, C. & Joppa, L. (2009) Expansion of the global terrestrial protected area system. Biological Conservation 142: 21662174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josse, C., Navarro, G., Comer, P., Evans, R., Faber-Langendoen, D., Fellows, M., Kittel, G., Menard, S., Pyne, M., Reid, M., Schulz, K., Snow, K. & Teague, J. (2003) Ecological Systems of Latin America and the Caribbean: A Working Classification of Terrestrial Systems. Arlington, USA: NatureServe.Google Scholar
Keith, S.A., Newton, A.C., Herbert, R.J.H., Morecroft, M.D. & Bealey, C.E. (2009) Non-analogous community formation in response to climate change. Journal for Nature Conservation 17: 228235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kier, G., Mutke, J., Dinerstein, E., Ricketts, T.H., Küper, W., Kreft, H. & Barthlott, W. (2005) Global patterns of plant diversity and floristic knowledge. Journal of Biogeography 32: 11071116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, C., Wilson, K., Watts, M., Stein, J., Carwardine, J., Mackey, B. & Possingham, H.P. (2009) Spatial conservation prioritization inclusive of wilderness quality: a case study of Australia's biodiversity. Biological Conservation 142: 12821290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamoreux, J.F., Morrison, J.C., Ricketts, T.H., Olson, D.M., Dinerstein, E., McKnight, M.W. & Shugart, H.H. (2006) Global tests of biodiversity concordance and the importance of endemism. Nature 440: 212213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leuschner, C. (2005) Vegetation and ecosystems. In: Vegetation Ecology, ed. van der Maarel, E., pp. 85105. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
López, R.P. & Zambrana-Torrelio, C.M. (2006) Representation of ecoregions in the protected area of Bolivia: the situation in relation to the new phytogeographical findings. Biodiversity and Conservation 15: 21632175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luebert, F. & Becerra, P. (1998) Representatividad vegetacional del Sistema Nacional de Áreas Silvestres Protegidas del Estado (SNASPE) en Chile. Ambiente y Desarrollo 14: 6269.Google Scholar
Luebert, F. & Pliscoff, P. (2006) Sinopsis bioclimática y vegetacional de Chile. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Universitaria.Google Scholar
Mackey, B.G., Nix, H.A., Stein, J.A., Cork, S.E. & Bullen, F.T. (1989) Assessing the representativeness of the wet tropics of Queensland world heritage property. Biological Conservation 50: 279303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maiorano, L., Falcucci, A., Garton, E.O. & Boitani, L. (2007) Contribution of the Natura 2000 network to biodiversity conservation in Italy. Conservation Biology 21: 14331444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mardones, G. (1998) Representatividad biogeográfica del sistema nacional de áreas silvestres protegidas del estado (SNASPE). Revista Geográfica de Chile Terra Australis 43: 3144.Google Scholar
Margules, C. & Pressey, R. (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405: 243253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marini, M.A., Barbet-Massin, M., Lopes, M.E. & Jiguet, F. (2009) Major current and future gap of Brazilian reserves to protect Neotropical savanna birds. Biological Conservation 142: 30393050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mella, J. & Simonetti, J. (1994) Representación de poblaciones viables: conservación de mamíferos en áreas silvestres protegidas de Chile. Ambiente y Desarrollo 10: 7278.Google Scholar
Mittermeier, R.A., Robles Gil, P., Hoffmann, M., Pilgrim, J., Brooks, T., Mittermeier, C.G., Lamoreux, J. & da Fonseca, G.A. (2004) Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions. Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico: CEMEX.Google Scholar
Moilanen, A. (2008) Generalized complementarity and mapping of the concepts of systematic conservation planning. Conservation Biology 22: 16551658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molnar, J., Marver, M. & Karieva, P. (2004) The sum is greater than the parts. Conservation Biology 18: 16701671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., da Fonseca, G.A.B. & Kent, J. (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oldfield, T.E.E., Smith, R.J., Harrop, S.R. & Leader-Williams, N. (2004) A gap analysis of terrestrial protected areas in England and its implications for conservation policy. Biological Conservation 120: 303309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. & Dinerstein, E. (2002) The Global 200: priority ecoregions for global conservation. Annual Missouri of Botanical Garden 89: 199224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauchard, A. & Villarroel, P. (2002) Protected areas in Chile: history, current status and challenges. Natural Areas Journal 22: 318330.Google Scholar
Pauchard, A., Aguayo, M., Peña, E. & Urrutia, R. (2006) Multiple effects of urbanization on the biodiversity of developing countries: the case of a fast-growing metropolitan area (Concepción, Chile). Biological Conservation 127: 272281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pliscoff, P. (2003) Priorización de áreas para fortalecer la conservación de la flora arbórea nativa en la zona mediterránea de Chile. MS Tesis, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar
Powell, G.V.N., Barborak, J. & Rodriguez, M. (2000) Assessing representativeness of protected natural areas in Costa Rica for conserving biodiversity: a preliminary gap analysis. Biological Conservation 93: 3541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prado, C. & Alvarez, M. (1994) Estado de Conservación de la Vegetación y Flora en Chile, In: Perfil ambiental de Chile, ed. Espinoza, G., Pisani, P., Contreras, L. & Camus, P., pp. 335364. Santiago, Chile: Comisión Nacional del Medio Ambiente.Google Scholar
Pressey, R.L. (2004) Conservation planning and biodiversity: assembling the best data for the job. Conservation Biology 18: 16771681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J.G. (2006) Conservation biology and real-world conservation. Conservation Biology 20: 658669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodrigues, A.S.L., Andelman, S.J., Bakarr, M.I., Boitani, L., Brooks, T.M., Cowling, R.M., Fishpool, L.D.C., da Fonseca, G.A.B., Gaston, K.J., Hoffmann, M., Long, J.S., Marquet, P.A., Pilgrim, J.D., Pressey, R.L., Schipper, J., Sechrest, W., Stuart, S.N., Underhill, L.G., Waller, R.W., Watts, M.E.J. & Yan, X. (2004 a) Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428: 640643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodrigues, A.S.L., Akcakaya, H.R., Andelman, S.J., Bakarr, M.I., Boitani, L., Brooks, T.M., Chanson, J.S., Fishpool, L.D.C., da Fonseca, G.A.B., Gaston, K.J., Hoffmann, M., Marquet, P.A., Pilgrim, J.D., Pressey, R.L., Schipper, J., Sechrest, W., Stuart, S.N., Underhill, L.G., Waller, R.W., Watts, M.E.J. & Yan, X. (2004 b) Global gap analysis: priority regions for expanding the global protected-area network. BioScience 54: 10921100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, N.A. & Burton, P.J. (2009) Using bioclimatic envelopes to identify temporal corridors in support of conservation planning in a changing climate. Forest Ecology and Management 258: 6474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulman, L., Ruokolainen, K., Junikka, L., Saaksjarvi, I.E., Salo, M., Juvonen, S.K., Salo, J. & Higgins, M. (2007) Amazonian biodiversity and protected areas: do they meet? Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 3011–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J.M., Davis, F., Csuti, B., Noss, R., Butterfield, B., Groves, C., Anderson, H., Caicco, S., D'Erchia, F., Edwards, T.C., Ulliman, J. & Wright, R.G. (1993) Gap analysis: a geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildlife Monograph 123: 141-.Google Scholar
Sierra, R., Campos, F. & Chamberlin, J. (2002) Assessing biodiversity conservation priorities: ecosystem risk and representativeness in continental Ecuador. Landscape and Urban Planning 59: 95110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soutullo, A. & Gudynas, E. (2006) How effective is the MERCOSUR's network of protected areas in representing South America's ecoregions?. Oryx 40: 112116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tognelli, M.F., Ramirez de Arellano, P.I. & Marquet, P.A. (2008) How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile?. Diversity and Distributions 14: 148158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, E.C., Klausmeyer, K.R., Cox, R.L., Busby, S.M., Morrison, S.A. & Shaw, M.R. (2009) Expanding the global network of protected areas to save the imperiled Mediterranean biome. Conservation Biology 23: 4352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Maarel, E. (2005) Vegetation ecology: an overview. In: Vegetation Ecology. ed. van der Maarel, E., pp. 151. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Vos, C., Berry, P., Opdam, P., Baveco, H., Nijhof, B., O'Hanley, J., Bell, C. & Kuipers, H. (2008) Adapting landscapes to climate change: examples of climate-proof ecosystem networks and priority adaptation zones. Journal of Applied Ecology 45: 17221731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J.W., Jackson, S.T. & Kutzbacht, J.E. (2007) Projected distributions of novel and disappearing climates by 2100 AD. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences USA 104: 57385742CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willis, S., Dave, G., Collingham, Y.C., Hilton, G., Rahbek, C. & Huntley, B. (2009) Assessing the impacts of future climate change on protected area networks: a method to simulate individual species’ responses. Environmental Management 43: 836845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiersma, Y.F. & Nudds, T.D. (2009) Efficiency and effectiveness in representative reserve design in Canada: the contribution of existing protected areas. Biological Conservation 142: 16391646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, C. (1983) Representación de las provincias biogeográficas por las Reservas de la Biósfera en Chile. Acción presente y futura de la Corporación Nacional Forestal. Corporación Nacional Forestal. Boletín Técnico (Valparaíso) 10: 123.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Pliscoff Supplementary Material

Pliscoff Online Appendix

Download Pliscoff Supplementary Material(File)
File 269 KB
52
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Representativeness of terrestrial ecosystems in Chile's protected area system
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Representativeness of terrestrial ecosystems in Chile's protected area system
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Representativeness of terrestrial ecosystems in Chile's protected area system
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *