Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Barriers and triggers to community participation across different stages of conservation management

  • EMILIO RODRÍGUEZ-IZQUIERDO (a1), MICHAEL C. GAVIN (a1) and MIGUEL O. MACEDO-BRAVO (a2)
Summary

Local community involvement in natural resource management can be critical to conservation success. Community participation in conservation efforts varies widely, reflecting a continuum from protectionist conservation mechanisms to programmes driven by local communities. Conservation is not one event, but an iterative process with many steps (planning, implementation, monitoring) each with an opportunity for different levels of participation. Barriers and triggers to more community involvement in management of the Cordillera Azul National Park (Peru) were examined. Eleven conservation officials and 73 community members provided information on levels of participation achieved at three management stages: Park establishment, management plan development, and management implementation. Park establishment was not a participatory process, owing to the expediency of the conservation agenda and a narrow window of political opportunity. Community involvement increased during the management plan development and its implementation, with communities eager to participate and a public-private partnership introducing new participatory management tools. However, a perceived lack of capacity in terms of community skills, funding availability, time and sufficient conservation personnel, and the definitions of participation used by different stakeholders, limited community involvement in decision-making processes. If conservation is to achieve more effective community involvement, long-term adaptive co-management approaches are needed that clearly define local participation, build capacity of all stakeholders and monitor levels of participation across all stages of project management.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence: Emilio Rodríguez-Izquierdo e-mail: 13emil@gmail.com
References
Hide All
Adams, W.M. & Hulme, D. (2001) If community conservation is the answer in Africa, what is the question? Oryx 35: 193200.
Agrawal, A. & Gibson, C.C. (2001) The role of community in natural resource conservation. In: Communities and the Environment: Ethnicity, Gender, and the State in Community-Based Conservation., ed. Agrawal, A. & Gibson, C.C., pp. 131. New Brunswick, USA: Rutgers University Press.
Agrawal, A., Redford, K. & Fearn, E. (2008) Conservation and human displacement. In: State of the Wild 2008–2009: A Global Portrait of Wildlife, Wildlands, and Oceans, ed. Fearn, E., pp. 198205. Washington., DC, USA: Island Press.
Barrow, E. & Murphree, M. (2001) Community conservation from concept to practice: a practical framework. In African Wildlife and Livelihoods: The Promise and Performance of Community Conservation, ed. Hulme, D. & Murphree, M., pp. 2437. Oxford, UK: James Currey.
Berkes, F. (1994) Co-management: bridging the two solitudes. Northern Perspectives 22: 1820.
Berkes, F. (2003) Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology 18: 621630.
Berkes, F. (2007) Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 1518815193.
Borrini-Feyerabend, G. (1996) Collaborative Management of Protected Areas: Tailoring the Approach to the Context. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN [www document]. URL http://www.iucn.org/themes/spg/Files/tailor.html
Brechin, S.R., Wilshusen, P.R., Fortwangler, C.L. & West, P.C. (2002) Beyond the square wheel: toward a more comprehensive understanding of biodiversity conservation as social and political process. Society and Natural Resources 15: 4164.
Carlsson, L. & Berkes, F. (2005) Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management 75: 6576.
Chapin, M. (2004) A challenge to conservationists. World Watch Magazine November/December: 1371.
Castro, A.P. & Nielsen, E. (2001) Indigenous people and co-management: implications for conflict management. Environmental Science and Policy 4: 229239.
Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Third edition. CA, USA: Sage Publications.
da Silva, P.P. (2004) From common property to co-management: lessons from Brazil's first maritime extractive reserve. Marine Policy 28: 419428.
Dearden, P., Bennet, M. & Johnston, J. (2005) Trends in global protected area governance, 1992–2002. Environmental Management 36: 89100.
Gavin, M. C., Wali, A. & Vasquez, M. (2007) Working towards and beyond collaborative resource management: parks, people, and participation in the Peruvian Amazon. In: Connecting People, Participation and Place: Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods, ed. Kindon, S., Pain, R. & Kesby, M., pp. 6070. London, UK: Routledge.
Gavin, M.C. & Anderson, G.J. (2007) Socioeconomic predictors of forest use values in the Peruvian Amazon: a potential tool for biodiversity conservation. Ecological Economics 60: 752762.
Haller, T., Galvin, M., Meroka, P., Alca, J. & Alvarez, A. (2008) Who gains from community conservation? Intended and unintended costs and benefits of participative approaches in Peru and Tanzania. The Journal of Environment and Development 17: 118144.
Horwich, R.H. & Lyon, J. (2007) Community conservation: practitioners’ answer to critics. Oryx 41: 376385.
Imperial, M.T. (1999) Institutional analysis and ecosystem-based management: the institutional analysis and development framework. Environmental Management 24: 449465.
INRENA (2006) Parque Nacional Cordillera Azul, Plan Maestro (2003–2008). Lima, Perú: INRENA.
Kellert, S.R., Mehta, J.N., Ebbin, S.A. & Lichtenfeld, L.L. (2000) Community natural resource management: promise, rhetoric, and reality. Society and Natural Resources 13: 705715.
Kiser, L. & Ostrom, E. (1982) The three worlds of action: a meta-theoretical synthesis of institutional approaches. In: Strategies of Political Inquiry, ed. Ostrom, E., pp. 179222. Beverly Hills, CA, USA: Sage.
Kothari, A. (2006) Community conserved areas. In Managing Protected Areas: a Global Guide, ed. Lockwood, M., Worboys, G. & Kothari, A., pp. 549572. London, UK/Sterling, VA, USA: Earthscan.
Kumar, S. (2002) Methods for Community Participation: a Complete Guide for Practitioners. London, UK: ITDG.
Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Alberti, M., Folke, C., Moran, E., Pell, A. N., Deadman, P., Kratz, T., Lubchenco, J., Ostrom, E., Ouyang, Z., Provencher, W., Redman, C. L., Schneider, S. H. & Taylor, W. W. (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317:15131516.
Margules, C.R. & Pressey, R.L. (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405: 243253.
Mayo, M. & Craig, G. (2004) Community participation and empowerment: the human face of structural adjustment or tools for democratic transformation? In: Community Empowerment: A Reader in Participation and Development, ed. Craig, G. & Mayo, M., pp. 111. London, UK: Zed Books.
Meffe, G.K., Nielsen, L.A., Knight, R.L. & Schenborn, D.A. (2002) Ecosystem Management: Adaptive, Community-Based Conservation. Washinton, DC, USA: Island Press.
Menzies, N.K. (2007) Our Forest, Your Ecosystem, Their Timber: Communities, Conservation, and the State in Community-Based Forest Management. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.
Olsson, P., Folke, C. & Berkes, F. (2004) Adaptive co-management for building resilience in social–ecological systems. Environmental Management 34: 7590.
Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Redford, K.H. & Sanjayan, M.A. (2003) Retiring Cassandra. Conservation Biology 17: 14731474.
Robinson, J.G. & Redford, K.H. (2004) Jack of all trades, master of none: inherent contradictions among ICDP approaches. In: Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work: Towards More Effective Conservation and Development, ed. McShane, T.O. & Wells, M.P., pp. 1033. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.
Salafsky, N. & Margoluis, C. (2004) Using adaptive management to improve ICDPs. In: Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work: Towards More Effective Conservation and Development, ed. McShane, T.O. & Wells, M.P., pp. 372394. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.
Sayer, J. & Wells, M.P. (2004) The pathology of projects. In Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work: Towards More Effective Conservation and Development, ed. McShane, T.O. & Wells, M.P., pp. 3548. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.
Spiteri, A. & Nepal, S.K. (2006) Incentive-based conservation programs in developing countries: a review of some key issues and suggestions for improvements. Environmental Management 37: 114.
Struhsaker, T.T., Struhsaker, P.J. & Siex, K.S. (2005) Conserving Africa's rain forests: problems in protected areas and possible solutions. Biological Conservation 123: 4554.
Thakadu, O.T. (2005) Success factors in community based natural resources management in northern Botswana: lessons from practice. Natural Resources Forum 29: 199212.
The Field Museum of Chicago (2007) Park story [www document]. URL http://www.fieldmuseum.org/cordilleraazul/parkstory.html
Twyman, C. (2000) Participatory conservation? Community-based natural resource management in Botswana. The Geographical Journal 166: 323335.
Wells, M.P., McShane, T.O., Dublin, H.T., O'Connor, S. & Redford, K.H. (2004) The future of integrated conservation and development projects: building on what works. In: Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work: Towards More Effective Conservation and Development, ed. McShane, T.O. & Wells, M.P., pp. 397419. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.
Wilshusen, P.R., Brechin, S.R., Fortwangler, C.L. & West, P.C. (2002) Reinventing a square wheel: critique of a resurgent ‘protection paradigm’ in international biodiversity conservation. Society and Natural Resources 15: 1740.
Young, K.R. & Rodríguez, L.O. (2006) Development of Peru's protected-area system: historical continuity of conservation goals. In: Globalization and New Geographies of Conservation, ed. Zimmerer, K.S., pp. 229254. Chicago, IL, USA/London, UK: The University of Chicago Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed