Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-88psn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-22T00:53:00.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Combating Desertification: Evaluation of Progress*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Harold E. Dregne
Harold E. Dregne
Affiliation:
Horn Distinguished Professor & Director, International Center for Arid and Semi-arid Land Studies, Texas Tech University, P.O. Box 4620, Lubbock, Texas 79409, USA; currently c/o S & T/AGR/RNR, Agency for International Development, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Despite all that has been accomplished with an uncoordinated global programme, the exaggerated expectations following UNCOD have not come close to being realized. Land degradation continues widely, even though in places dunes are being stabilized, trees planted, and there is some success in reducing salinization of irrigated land. Too little effort is directed towards field control of desertification. All of the indirect contributions to desertification control (education, research, training, increasing awareness, assessments, etc.) will, presumably, assist in combating desertification in the field at some time in the future. It appears certain, however, that there will be no dramatic improvement by the year 2000 unless there is far more focusing of efforts on field projects than at present. Here the activities of NGOs and some governmental agencies are to be appauded but should also be multiplied and strengthened—wherever possible with community involvement and adequate incentives.

Information

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , Summer 1984 , pp. 115 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Anon, [also cited as UNCOD] (1978). United Nations Conference on Desertification… Round-up, Plan of Action and Resolutions. United Nations, New York, NY, USA: iii + 43 pp., fig.Google Scholar
Berg, Norman A. & Gray, Robert J. (1984). Soil conservation: the search for solutions. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 39, pp. 18–22.Google Scholar
Biswas, Margaret R. (1978). UN Conference on Desertification, in retrospect. Environmental Conservation, 5(4), pp. 247–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comptroller General (1983). Agriculture's Soil Conservation Programs Miss Full Potential in the Fight Against Soil Erosion. US General Accounting Office, Washington, DC, USA: 79 pp.Google Scholar
Crawford, Clifford S. & Gosz, James R. (1982). Desert ecosystems: their resources in space and time. Environmental Conservation, 9(3), pp. 181–95, 9 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dregne, Harold E. (1983). Desertification of Arid Lands. (Advances in Desert and Arid Land Technology and Development, Volume 3.) Harwood Academic Publishers, P.O. Box 786, Cooper Station, New York, NY 10276, USA: x + 242 pp., illustr. [Being reviewed in our columns.]Google Scholar
Lamb, Robert P. (1982). Desertification case-study: from nomad's land to no-man's land. Environmental Conservation, 9(3), pp. 243–5, 2 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, A., Houérou, H.N. le & Lundholm, B. (Ed.) (1976). Can Desert Encroachment be Stopped? A Study with Emphasis on Africa. (Ecological Bulletins No. 24.) United Nations Environment Programme and Secretariat for International Ecology, Stockholm, Sweden: 241 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
UNCOD—see Anon.Google Scholar
Weber, Fred (1982). Review of CILSS Forestry Sector Program Analysis Papers. USDA/OICD/TAD and AID/USDA/ USFS, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA: 82 pp.Google Scholar
Went, Frits W. & Babu, V. Ramesh (1978). Plant life and desertification. Environmental Conservation, 5(4), pp. 263–72, 6 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar