Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Defining and evaluating the impact of cross-disciplinary conservation research

  • ANNA C. EVELY (a1) (a2), IOAN FAZEY (a3), XAVIER LAMBIN (a1), EMILY LAMBERT (a1), SARAH ALLEN (a4) and MICHELLE PINARD (a1) (a2)...

Summary

Cross-disciplinary research is advocated as a way of improving understanding of the complexity of environmental problems; cross-disciplinary projects, centres and academic institutes have increased. However, there is confusion over the nature of cross-disciplinary research. Through review of papers defining themselves as cross-disciplinary that aim to address conservation problems, and by standardizing the definition of cross-disciplinary research, it is possible to evaluate the potential research impact on peers and practitioners. When papers were reclassified by authors, those reclassified as transdisciplinary were perceived to have a greater impact on practitioners, and those reclassified as non cross-disciplinary had the greatest impact on colleagues. Having clear definitions for types of cross-disciplinary research would help establish a firm foundation, not only for improving research quality, but also for evaluating research impact. While the number of cross-disciplinary studies is increasing, cross-disciplinary research falls short of integrating disciplinary methods in much depth and does not have much impact on participants outside of academia.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Correspondence: Dr Anna Evely e-mail: a.c.evely@abdn.ac.uk

References

Hide All
Akaike, H. (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19: 716723.
Angermeier, P.L. (2000) The natural imperative for biological conservation. Conservation Biology 14: 373381.
Aswani, S. & Lauer, M. (2002) Benthic mapping using local aerial photo interpretation and resident taxa inventories for designing marine protected areas. Environmental Conservation 33: 263273.
Bammer, G. (2005) Integration and implementation sciences: building a new specialization. Ecology and Society 10: 6 [www document]. URL http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art6/
Beierle, T.C. (2002) The quality of practitioner-based decisions. Risk Analysis 22: 739749.
Blackstock, K.L., Kelly, G.J. & Horsey, B.L. (2007) Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability. Ecological Economics 60: 726742.
Brody, S.D. (2003) Measuring the effects of practitioner participation on the quality of local plans based on the principles of collaborative ecosystem management. Journal of Planning Education and Research 22: 407419.
Bruce, A., Lyall, C., Tait, J. & Williams, R. (2004) Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: the case of the Fifth Framework programme. Futures 36: 457470.
Carlsson, L. & Berkes, F. (2005) Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management 75: 6576.
Clark, T.W. (2001) Developing policy-oriented curricula for conservation biology: professional and leadership education in the public interest. Conservation Biology 15: 3139.
Colding, J. & Folke, C. (2001) Social taboos: ‘invisible’ systems of local resource management and biological conservation. Ecological Applications 11: 584600.
Daily, G.C. & Ehrlich, P.R. (1999) Managing earth's ecosystems: an interdisciplinary challenge. Ecosystems 2: 277280.
Dovers, S. (2005) Clarifying the imperative of integration research for sustainable environmental management. Journal of Research Practice 1: M1 [www document]. URL http://jrp.icaap.org/content/v1.2/dovers.html
Evely, A.C., Fazey, I., Pinard, M. & Lambin, X. (2008) The influence of philosophical perspectives in integrative research: a conservation case study in the Cairngorms National Park. Ecology and Society 13: 52 [www document]. URL http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art52/
Fazey, I., Evely, A.C., Latham, I., Kesby, M., Wagatora, D., Hagasua, J.E., Christie, M. & Reed, M.S. (2010) Reducing vulnerability: a three-tiered learning approach for collaborative research in the Solomon Islands. Global Environmental Change (in press).
Fazey, I., Fazey, J.A. & Fazey, D.M.A. (2005 a) Learning more effectively from experience. Ecology and Society 10: 4 [www document]. URL http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art4/
Fazey, I., Fischer, J. & Lindenmayer, D.B. (2005 b) What do conservation biologists publish? Biological Conservation 124: 6373.
Fazey, I., Salisbury, J.G., Lindenmayer, D.B., Maindonald, D. & Douglas, R. (2004) Summarising and disseminating conservation research: can we use methods applied in medicine? Environmental Conservation 31: 190198.
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P. & Norberg, J. (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 30: 441473.
Gadgil, M., Berkes, F. & Folke, C. (1993) Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation. Ambio 22: 151156.
Graybill, J.K., Dooling, S., Shandas, V., Withey, J., Greve, A & Simon, G.L. (2006) A rough guide to interdisciplinarity graduate student perspectives. BioScience 56: 757763.
Gunderson, L.H. & Holling, C.S., eds (2002) Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.
Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2006) Concentration of the most-cited papers in the scientific literature: analysis of journal ecosystems. PLoS ONE 1 (1): e5. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000005
Jacobson, S. K. & Robinson, J. G. (1990). Training the new conservationist: cross-disciplinary education in the 1990s. Environmental Conservation 17, 319327.
Kareiva, P., Marvier, M., West, S. & Hornisher, J. (2002) Slow-moving journals hinder conservation efforts. Nature 420: 15.
Kates, R.W., Clark, W.C., Corell, R., Hall, J.M., Jaeger, C.C., Lowe, I., McCarthy, J.J., Schellnhuber, H.J., Bolin, B., Dickson, N.M., Faucheux, S., Gallopin, G.C., Grubler, A., Huntley, B., Jager, J., Jodha, N.S., Kasperson, R.E., Mabogunje, A., Matson, P., Mooney, H., Moore, B., O'Riordan, T. & Svedin, U. (2001) Environment and development: sustainability science. Science 292: 641642.
Kinzig, A. (2001) Bridging disciplinary divides to address environmental and intellectual challenges. Ecosystems 4: 709–71.
Landis, J.R. & Koch, G.G. (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159–74.
Lawrence, R.J. & Després, C. (2004) Futures of transdisciplinarity. Futures 36: 398.
MA (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.
MacMynowski, D.P. (2007) Pausing at the brink of interdisciplinarity: power and knowledge at the meeting of social and biophysical science. Ecology and Society 12: 20 [www document]. URL http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art20/
Miller, T.R., Baird, T.D., Littlefield, C.M., Kofinas, G., Chapin, F. & Redman, C.L. (2008) Epistemological pluralism: reorganizing interdisciplinary research. Ecology and Society 13: 46 [www document]. URL http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art46/
Newell, W.H. (2001) A theory of interdisciplinary studies. Issues in integrative Studies 19: 125.
O'Fallon, L.R. & Dearry, A. (2002) Community-based participatory research as a tool to advance environmental health science. Environmental Justice 110: 155159.
Pullin, A.S., Knight, T.M., Stone, D.A. & Charman, K. (2004) Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making? Biological Conservation 119: 245252.
R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [www document]. URL http://www.R-project.org
Reed, M.S. (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management. Biological Conservation 141: 24172431.
Reich, S.M. & Reich, J.A. (2006) Cultural competence in interdisciplinary collaborations: a method for respecting diversity in research partnerships. American Journal of Community Psychology 38: 5162.
Renn, O., Webler, T. & Wiedemann, P., eds (1995) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Rowe, G. & Frewer, L. (2000) Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation in science. Technology and Human Values 25: 329.
Soulé, M.E. (1985) What is conservation biology? BioScience 35: 727734.
Stokols, D., Fuqua, J., Gress, J., Harvey, R., Phillips, K., Baezconde-Garbanati, L., Unger, J., Palmer, P., Clark, M., Colby, S., Morgan, G. & Trochin, W. (2003) Evaluating transdisciplinary science. Nicotine and Tobacco Research 5: 2139.
Stringer, L.C., Prell, C., Reed, M. S., Hubacek, K., Fraser, E.D.G. & Dougill, A.J. (2006). Unpacking ‘participation’ in the adaptive management of socio-ecological systems: a critical review. Ecology and Society 11: 39 [www document]. URL http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art39/
Sutherland, W.J., Armstrong-Brown, S., Armsworth, P.R., Tom, B., Brickland, J., Campbell, C.D., Chamberlain, D.E., Cooke, A.I., Dulvy, N.K., Dusic, N.R., Fitton, M., Freckleton, R.P., Godfray, H.C.J., Grout, N., Harvey, H.J., Hedley, C., Hopkins, J.J., Kift, N.B., Kirby, J., Kunin, W.E., Macdonald, D.W., Marker, B., Naura, M., Neale, A.R., Oliver, T., Osborn, D., Pullin, A.S., Shardlow, M.E.A., Showler, D.A., Smith, P.L., Smithers, R.J., Solandt, J.L., Spencer, J., Spray, C.J., Thomas, C.D. & Thompson, J. (2006) The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK. Journal of Applied Ecology 43: 617627.
Tainter, J.A. (1988) The Collapse of Complex Societies. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Tress, B., Tress, G. & Fry, G. (2005 a) Clarifying integrative research concepts in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology 20: 479493.
Tress, B., Tress, G. & Fry, G. (2005 b) Researchers' experiences, positive and negative, in integrative landscape projects. Environmental Management 36: 792807.
Turner, B.L., Clark, W.C., Kates, R.W., Richards, J.F., Mathews, J.T. & Meyer, W.B., eds (1990) The Earth as Transformed by Human Action: Global and Regional Changes in the Biosphere over the Past 300 Years. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Venables, W.N. & Ripley, B.D. (2002) Modern Applied Statistics with SPSS. Fourth edition. New York, NY, USA: Springer.
Webler, T. (1999) The craft and theory of public participation: a dialectical process. Journal of Risk Research 2: 5571.
Westley, F. (2002) The devil in the dynamics: adaptive management on the front lines. In: Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, ed. Gunderson, L.H. & Holling, C.S., pp. 333360. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Evely supplementary material
Appendix.doc

 Word (42 KB)
42 KB

Defining and evaluating the impact of cross-disciplinary conservation research

  • ANNA C. EVELY (a1) (a2), IOAN FAZEY (a3), XAVIER LAMBIN (a1), EMILY LAMBERT (a1), SARAH ALLEN (a4) and MICHELLE PINARD (a1) (a2)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.