Skip to main content Accessibility help

Democratic decentralization in sub-Saharan Africa: its contribution to forest management, livelihoods, and enfranchisement

  • J. C. RIBOT (a1), J. F. LUND (a2) and T. TREUE (a2)


Efforts to promote popular participation in forest management in Sub-Saharan Africa have faced many obstacles and disappointments. Although promises of improvements in relation to forest management, rural livelihoods and local enfranchisement have been achieved in some cases, accounts of frustration outnumber those of success. Focusing on participation through democratic decentralization (namely the transfer of meaningful discretionary powers to local representative authorities), this paper reviews recent empirical studies on the outcomes of popular participation in forest management. The implementation of decentralization of forest management, and ecological, livelihood and democracy outcomes are examined, and misconceptions in analyses of decentralized forestry are explored. The expected benefits of democratic decentralization within forestry are rarely realized because democratic decentralization is rarely established. In most cases, local authorities do not represent the local population or their space of discretion is so narrow that they have little effect on management. There is little official local management taking place, even under so-called decentralized or participatory management arrangements. If ever significant space for local discretion under democratic authorities is created, researchers will have the opportunity to study whether democratic decentralization can deliver the theoretically promised positive outcomes. Nevertheless, some cases shed light on effects of local decision making. Three general observations are made on effects of decentralization. First, environmental, livelihood and democracy objectives are not always mutually reinforcing, and under some circumstances they may be at odds. Second, environmental effects of improved forest management often result in benefits accruing to distant or higher-scale aggregate populations, while local communities carry the costs. Third, poor peoples' use of natural resources to maintain their livelihoods often conflicts with profit and revenue interests of local elites, national commercial interests and governments. A negotiated minimum social and environmental standards approach to decentralization of forest management may safeguard essential ecological functions and at the same time protect essential livelihood and economic values of forests at all scales of society. The remainder of decisions, such as how forests are used, by whom and for what, could then be safely placed at the discretion of responsive local representatives.


Corresponding author

*Correspondence: Dr J. C. Ribot e-mail:


Hide All
Agrawal, A. (2005) Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects. Durham, USA: Duke University Press.
Agrawal, A. & Chhatre, A. (2006) Explaining success on the commons: community forest governance in the Indian Himalaya. World Development 34: 149166.
Agrawal, A. & Ribot, J.C. (1999) Accountability in decentralization: a framework with South Asian and African cases. Journal of Developing Areas 33: 473502.
Assembe Mvondo, S. (2006) Decentralized forest resources and access of minorities to environmental justice: an analysis of the case of the Baka in Southern Cameroon. International Journal of Environmental Studies 63: 681689.
Banana, A.Y., Vogt, N.D., Bahati, J. & Gombya-Ssembajjwe, W. (2007) Decentralized governance and ecological health: why local institutions fail to moderate deforestation in Mpigi district of Uganda. Scientific Research and Essay 2: 434445.
Bandiaky, S. (2007) Engendering exclusion in Senegal's democratic decentralization: subordinating women through participatory natural resource management. Representation, Equity and Environment Working Paper Series. Washington DC, USA: World Resources Institute.
Bates, R.H. (1981) Markets and States in Tropical Africa. The Political Basis of Agricultural Policies. Los Angeles, USA: University of California Press.
Bazaara, N. (2003) Decentralization, politics and environment in Uganda. Environmental Governance in Africa Working Paper No. 7. Washington DC, USA: World Resources Institute.
Bazaara, N. (2006) Subjecting nature to central authority: the struggle over public goods in the formation of citizenship. African Development 31:2137.
Benjamin, C.E. (2008) Legal pluralism and decentralization: natural resource management in Mali. World Development 36: 22552276.
Blaikie, P. (2006) Is small really beautiful? Community-based natural resource management in Malawi and Botswana. World Development 34: 19421957.
Blomley, T., Pfliegner, K., Isango, J., Zahabu, E., Ahrends, A. & Burgess, N.D. (2008) Seeing the wood for the trees: an assessment of the impact of participatory forest management on forest condition in Tanzania. Oryx 42: 112.
Brockington, D. (2007) Forests, community conservation and local government performance: the village forest reserves of Tanzania. Society and Natural Resources 20: 835848.
Buur, L. & Kyed, H.M., eds (2007) State Recognition and Democratization in sub-Saharan Africa. New York, NY, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
Campbell, B., Mandodo, A., Nemarundwe, N., Sithole, B., Dejong, W., Luckert, M., & Matose, F. (2001) Challenges to proponents of common property resource systems: despairing voices from the social forests of Zimbabwe. World Development 29: 589600.
Campbell, B.M., Jeffrey, S., Kozanayi, W., Luckert, M., Mutamba, M. & Zindi, C. (2002) Household Livelihoods in the Semi-Arid Regions: Options and Constraints. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.
Cavendish, W. (2000) Empirical regularities in the poverty-environment relationship of African rural households: evidence from Zimbabwe. World Development 28: 19792003.
Chambers, R. (1994) Paradigm shifts and the practice of participatory research and development. In: Power and Participatory Development. Theory and Practice, ed. Nelson, N. & Wright, S., pp. 3042. London, UK: Intermediate Technology Publications.
Ferguson, J. (1996) The Anti-Politics Machine. Development, Depolitization and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Feyissa, D. (2006) Decentralization as ethnic closure, with special reference to a declining negotiated access to natural resources in Western Ethiopia. Africa Development 31: 243260.
Føllesdal, A. (1998) Survey article: subsidiarity. Journal of Political Philosophy 6:190218.
Hansen, C.P., Lund, J.F. & Treue, T. (2009) Neither fast, nor easy. The implementation of Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) in Ghana. International Forestry Review 11: 439455.
Hobley, M., ed. (1996) Participatory forestry: the process of change in India and Nepal. Rural Development Forestry Study Guide 3. London, UK: Overseas Development Institute.
Kajembe, G.C., Nduwamungu, J. & Luoga, E.J. (2006) The impact of community based forest management and joint forest management on the forest resource base and local people's livelihoods: case studies from Tanzania. Commons Southern Africa occasional series 8. Zimbabwe: University of Harare.
Kulipossa, F.P. (2004) Decentralisation and democracy in developing countries: an overview. Development in Practice 14: 768779.
Larson, A.M. (2003) Decentralization and forest management in Latin America: towards a working model. Public Administration and Development 23 (3): 211226.
Larson, A.M. & Ribot, J.C. (2007) The poverty of forestry policy: double standards on an uneven playing field. Sustainability Science 2: 189204.
Lindsay, J. (1998) Designing legal space: law as an enabling tool in community-based management [www document]. URL
Lund, J.F. (2007) Is small beautiful? Village level taxation of natural resources in Tanzania. Public Administration and Development 27: 307318.
Lund, J.F. & Treue, T. (2008) Are we getting there? Evidence of decentralized forest management from the Tanzanian miombo woodlands. World Development 36: 27802800.
Lund, J.F., Balooni, K. & Casse, T. (2009) Change we can believe in? Reviewing studies on the conservation impact of popular participation in forest management. Conservation and Society 7 (2): 7182.
Lund, J.F., Helles, F. & Treue, T. (2007) Decentralised forest management: reasons for official ambiguities and guide to donors [www document]. URL
Madondo, A. & Kozanayi, W. (2006) Demand-driven model of decentralized land-use planning and natural resource management: experiences from Chiredzi District of Zimbabwe. Africa Development 31: 103122.
Manin, B., Przeworski, A. & Stokes, S. (1999) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Manor, J. (1999) The Political Economy of Democratic Decentralization. Washington DC, USA: The World Bank.
Mawhood, P. (1983) Local Government in the Third World. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
Meshack, C.K., Adhikari, B., Doggart, N. & Lovett, J.C. (2006) Transaction costs of community-based forest management: empirical evidence from Tanzania. African Journal of Ecology 44: 468477.
Muhereza, F. (2003) Environmental decentralization and the management of forest resources in Masindi District, Uganda. Environmental Governance in Africa working paper 8. Washington DC: World Resources Institute.
Muhereza, F. (2006) Decentralizing natural resource management and the politics of institutional resource management in Uganda's forest sub-sector. Africa Development 31: 67102.
Mustalahti, I. & Lund, J.F. (2010) Where and how can participatory forest management succeed? Learning from Tanzania, Mozambique and Laos. Society and Natural Resources 23: 3144.
Nemarundwe, N. (2004) Social characters and organisation for access to woodlands: institutional implications for devolving responsibilities for resource management to the local level in Chivi District, Zimbabwe. Society and Natural Resources 17: 279291.
North, D.C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Oyono, P.R. (2004) One step forward, two steps back? Paradoxes of natural resources management decentralization in Cameroon. Journal of Modern African Studies 42: 91111.
Oyono, P.R. (2005) The social and organisational roots of ecological uncertainties in Cameroon's forest management decentralization model. In: Democratic Decentralization Through a Natural Resource Lens, ed. Ribot, J.C. & Larson, A.M., pp. 174191. London, UK: Routledge.
Oyono, P.R. & Efoua, S. (2006) Qui represente qui ? Choix organisationnels, identites sociales et formation d'une elite forestiere au Cameroon. Africa Development 31: 147182.
Pattanayak, S.K. & Sills, E.O. (2001) Do tropical forests provide natural insurance? The microeconomics of non-timber forest product collection in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Economics 77: 595612.
Persha, L. & Blomley, T. (2009) Management decentralization and montane forest conditions in Tanzania. Conservation Biology 23: 14851496.
Petrasek, D., El Tom, F. & Archer, R. (2002) Local rule: decentralisation and human rights. Geneva, Switzerland: International Council on Human Rights Policy.
Ribot, J.C. (1998) Theorizing access: forest profits along Senegal's charcoal commodity chain. Development and Change 29: 307341.
Ribot, J.C. (1999) Decentralization and participation in Sahelian forestry: legal instruments of central political-administrative control. Africa 69: 2464.
Ribot, J.C. (2004) Waiting for Democracy: The Politics of Choice in Natural Resource Decentralization. Washington, DC, USA: World Resources Institute.
Ribot, J.C. (2009) Access over authority: recentralizing benefits in Senegal's forestry decentralization. Development and Change 40: 105129. See film version of this article [www document]. URL
Ribot, J.C. & Mearns, R. (2008) Steering community driven development? A desk study of NRM choices. WRI Environmental Governance in Africa Working Paper series [www document]. URL
Ribot, J.C. & Oyono, R. (2005) The politics of decentralization. In: Toward a New Map of Africa, ed. Wisner, B., Toulmin, C. & Chitiga, R., pp. 88113. London, UK: Earthscan Press.
Ribot, J.C. & Oyono, R. (2006) Decentralization in Africa: an overview. Africa Development 31: 119.
Ribot, J.C. & Peluso, N.L. (2003) A theory of access, Rural Sociology 68: 153181.
Ribot, J.C., Chhatre, A. & Lankina, T. (2008) Institutional choice and recognition in the formation and consolidation of local democracy. Representation, Equity and Environment Working Paper Series. Washington DC, USA: World Resources Institute.
Rihoy, E.C. & Maguranyanga, B. (2007) Devolution and democratisation of natural resource management in Southern Africa: a comparative analysis of CBNRM policy processes in Botswana and Zimbabwe. CASS-PLAAS CBNRM Occasional Paper No 18. Cape Town, South Africa: University of Western Cape.
Roe, D., Nelson, F. & Sandbrook, C., eds (2009) Community management of natural resources in Africa: impacts, experiences and future directions. Natural Resource Issues No. 18. London, UK: International Institute for Environment and Development.
Rocher, F. & Rouillard, C. (1998) Decentralization, subsidiarity, and neoliberalism in Canada: when the tree hides the forest. Canadian Public Policy-Analyse de Politiques 24: 233258.
Saito-Jensen, M. & Jensen, C.B. (2010) Rearranging social space boundary-making in a Joint Forest Management project, Andhra Pradesh, India. Conservation and Society (in press).
Sauer, J. & Abdallah, J.M. (2007) Forest diversity, tobacco production and resource management in Tanzania. Forest Policy and Economics 9: 421439.
Schreckenberg, K. & Luttrell, C. (2009) Participatory forest management: a route to poverty reduction? International Forestry Review 11: 221238.
Smoke, P. (2003) Decentralisation in Africa: goals, dimensions, myths and challenges. Public Administration and Development 23: 716.
Sunderlin, W., Hatcher, J. & Liddle, M. (2008) From exclusion to ownership? Challenges and opportunities in advancing forest tenure reform. Washington, DC, USA: Rights and Resources Initiative.
Tacconi, L., Siagian, Y., & Syam, R. (2006) On the theory of decentralization, forests and livelihoods, Environmental Management and Development Occasional Papers No. 09. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University.
Topp-Jørgensen, E., Poulsen, M.K., Lund, J.F. & Massao, J.F. (2005) Community-based monitoring of natural resource use and forest quality in montane forests and miombo woodlands in Iringa District, Tanzania. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 26532677.
Turyahambwe, N., Geldenhuys, C.J., Watts, S. & Obua, J. (2007) Local organizations and decentralized forest management in Uganda: roles, challenges and policy implications. International Forestry Review 9: 581596.
von Benda-Beckmann, K. (1981) Forum shopping and shopping forums: dispute processing in a Minangkabau Village in West Sumatra. Journal of Legal Pluralism 19: 117162.
Vyamana, V. (2009) Participatory forest management in the Eastern Arc mountains of Tanzania: who benefits? International Forestry Review 11: 239253.
Wardell, D.A. & Lund, C. (2006) Governing access to forests in Northern Ghana: micro-politics and the rents of non-enforcement. World Development 34: 18871906.
Watts, S. (2003) The effects of communal land resource management on forest conservation in northern and north-eastern Namibia. Development Southern Africa 20: 337358.
Wily, L.A. (2001) Forest management and democracy in East and Southern Africa: lessons from Tanzania. Gatekeeper Series 95. London, UK: International Institute for Environment and Development.
Wily, L.A. (no date, c. 2000) Making woodland management more democratic: cases from Eastern and Southern Africa. International Institute for Environment and Development. [www document]. URL
Wittayapak, C. & Vandergeest, P., eds (2009) The Politics of Decentralization: Natural Resource Management in Asia. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Mekong Press.
World Bank/WWF Alliance (2002) Forest Law Assessment in Selected African Countries. Washington, DC, USA: The World Bank.
Wurster, K. (2010) Does management matter? Assessing the effects of charcoal production and management on woodland regeneration in Senegal. Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, USA.
Zulu, L.C. (2008) Community forest management in Southern Malawi: solution or part of the problem? Society and Natural Resources 21: 687703.



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed