Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Determinants of livelihood strategy variation in two extractive reserves in Amazonian flooded and unflooded forests

  • PETER NEWTON (a1), WHALDENER ENDO (a2) and CARLOS A. PERES (a1)
Summary

Extractive reserves account for a significant proportion of the remaining intact forest within Brazilian Amazonia. Managers of extractive reserves need to understand the livelihood strategies adopted by rural Amazonians in order to implement projects that benefit the livelihoods of local residents whilst maintaining forest integrity. Whilst resident populations are often descended from immigrant rubber-tappers, dynamic economic and social conditions have led to a recent diversification of land-use practices. This two-year study in two large contiguous extractive reserves encompassing both unflooded (terra firme) and seasonally flooded (várzea) forest, shows the degree to which local livelihood strategies of different settlements are heterogeneous. Extractive offtake of forest products and fish catches and agricultural activities, together with income from sales, for 82 households in 10 communities were quantified in detail by means of weekly surveys. The survey data were combined with interviews to examine the demographic and wealth profile, and engagement in alternative activities, in 181 households across 27 communities. All households and communities were engaged in all three subsistence activity types, but there was large variation in engagement with income-generating activities. Households within a community showed considerable congruence in their income-generating activity profiles, but there was significant variation between communities. Yields from agriculture and fishing were more temporally stable than extraction of highly-seasonal forest products. Generalized linear mixed models showed that forest type was consistently important in explaining yields of both agrarian and extractive products. Communities with greater access to terra firme forest were inherently more agricultural, and strongly committed to manioc production. Communities with greater access to flooded forest, however, showed a greater dependence on fishing. Conservation should be more attuned to the diversity and dynamism of livelihood strategies in protected areas; in particular, reserve managers and policy makers should account for the effect of local variation in physical geography when designing sustainable development projects.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Determinants of livelihood strategy variation in two extractive reserves in Amazonian flooded and unflooded forests
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Determinants of livelihood strategy variation in two extractive reserves in Amazonian flooded and unflooded forests
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Determinants of livelihood strategy variation in two extractive reserves in Amazonian flooded and unflooded forests
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence: Peter Newton Tel: +44 7877 309564 e-mail: newton.pete@gmail.com
References
Hide All
Abizaid, C. (2005) An antropogenic meander cutoff along the Ucayali River, Peruvian Amazon. American Geographical Review 95: 122135.
Allegretti, M.H. (1990) Extractive reserves: an alternative for reconciling development and environmental conservation in Amazonia. In: Alternatives to Deforestation: Steps Toward Sustainable Use of the Amazonian Rain forest, ed. Anderson, A. B., pp. 252264 New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.
ARPA (2010) Programa Àreas Protegidas da Amazônia: Amazônia Brasileira. Instituto Socioambiental, Manaus, Brazil.
Belcher, B. & Schreckenberg, K. (2007) Commercialisation of non-timber forest products: a reality check. Development Policy Review 25: 355377.
Belcher, B., Ruiz-Perez, M. & Achdiawan, R. (2005) Global patterns and trends in the use and management of commercial NTFPs: implications for livelihoods and conservation. World Development 33: 14351452.
Boughey, K.L., Lake, I.R., Haysom, K.A. & Dolman, P.M. (2011) Effects of landscape-scale broadleaved woodland configuration and extent on roost location for six bat species across the UK. Biological Conservation doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.06.008.
Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. (2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information-theoretic Approach. New York, NY, USA: Springer.
Calcagno, V. (2010) glmulti: GLM model selection and multimodel inference made easy. R package version 0.6-3 [www document]. URL http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=glmulti
Campos, M.T. & Nepstad, D.C. (2006) Smallholders, the Amazon's new conservationists. Conservation Biology 20: 15531556.
Coomes, O.T. & Barham, B.L. (1997) Rain forest extraction and conservation in Amazonia. The Geographical Journal 163: 180188.
Coomes, O.T. & Burt, G.J. (2001) Peasant charcoal production in the Peruvian Amazon: rainforest use and economic resiliance. Forest Ecology and Management 140: 3950.
Dean, W. (1987) Brazil and the Struggle for Rubber. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Fearnside, P.M. (1989) Extractive reserves in Brazilian Amazonia. Bioscience 39: 387393.
Ferraz, G., Marinelli, C.E. & Lovejoy, T.E. (2008) Biological monitoring in the Amazon: recent progress and future needs. Biotropica 40: 710.
Hall, A. (2004) Extractive reserves: building natural assets in the Brazilian Amazon. Working Paper Series, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
Hecht, S.B. (1993) The logic of livestock and deforestation in Amazonia. Bioscience 43: 687695.
Koziell, I. & Saunders, J. (2001) Living off Biodiversity: Exploring Livelihoods and Biodiversity Issues in Natural Resources Management. London, UK: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).
Lehner, B., Verdin, K. & Jarvis, A. (2006) HydroSHEDS Technical Documentation. World Wildlife Fund US, Washington, DC, USA [www document]. URL http://hydrosheds.cr.usgs.gov
Natura (2007) Plano de desenvolvimento sustentável junto as comunidades do Médio Juruá. Report. CARE Brazil and Natura, São Paulo, Brazil.
Nepstad, D., McGrath, D., Alencar, A., Barros, A.C., Carvalho, G., Santilli, M. & Diaz, M.D.V. (2002) Frontier governance in Amazonia. Science 295: 629631.
Newton, P., Nichols, E.S., Endo, W. & Peres, C.A. (2011 a) Consequences of actor level livelihood heterogeneity for additionality in a tropical forest payment for environmental services programme with an undifferentiated reward structure. Global Environmental Change doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.006
Newton, P., Watkinson, A.R. & Peres, C.A. (2011 b) Determinants of yield in a non-timber forest product: Copaifera oleoresin in Amazonian extractive reserves. Forest Ecology and Management 261: 255264.
Pacheco, P. (2009) Smallholder livelihoods, wealth and deforestation in the eastern Amazon. Human Ecology 37: 2741.
Parry, L., Day, B., Amaral, S. & Peres, C.A. (2010 a) Drivers of rural exodus from Amazonian headwaters. Population and Environment 32: 137176.
Parry, L., Peres, C. A., Day, B. & Amaral, S. (2010 b) Rural-urban migration brings conservation threats and opportunities to Amazonian watersheds. Conservation Letters 3 (4): 251259.
Peres, C.A., Baider, C., Zuidema, P.A., Wadt, L.H.O., Kainer, K.A., Gomes-Silva, D.A.P., Salomao, R.P., Simoes, L.L., Franciosi, E.R.N., Valverde, F.C., Gribel, R., Shepard, G.H., Kanashiro, M., Coventry, P., Yu, D.W., Watkinson, A.R. & Freckleton, R.P. (2003) Demographic threats to the sustainability of Brazil nut exploitation. Science 302: 21122114.
Projeto RADAMBRASIL (1977) Levantamento de recursos naturais: folha SB. 19 Juruá. Report. Ministério das Minas e Energia, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
R Development Core Team (2010) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing [www document]. URL http://www.R-project.org/
Rodrigues, A.S.L., Ewers, R.M., Parry, L., Souza, C. Jr., Verissimo, A. & Balmford, A. (2009) Boom-and-bust development patterns across the Amazon deforestation frontier. Science 324: 14351437.
Ruiz-Perez, M., Almeida, M., Dewi, S., Costa, E.M.L., Pantoja, M.C., Puntodewo, A., Postigo, A.D. & de Andrade, A.G. (2005) Conservation and development in Amazonian extractive reserves: the case of Alto Jurua. Ambio 34: 218223.
Ruiz-Pérez, M., Belcher, B., Achdiawan, R., Alexiades, M., Aubertin, C., Caballero, J., Campbell, B., Clement, C., Cunningham, A., Fantini, A., de Foresta, H., García Fernández, C., Gautam, K.H., Hersch Martínez, P., de Jong, W., Kusters, K., Kutty, M.G., López, C., Fu, M., Martínez Alfaro, M.A., Nair, T.K.R., Ndoye, O., Ocampo, R., Rai, N., Ricker, M., Schreckenberg, K., Shackleton, S., Shanley, P., Sunderland, T. & Youn, Y. (2004) Markets drive the specialisation strategies of forest peoples. Ecology and Society 9: 4.
Salisbury, D.S. & Schmink, M. (2007) Cows versus rubber: changing livelihoods among Amazonian extractivists. Geoforum 38: 12331249.
Santos, G.M., Ferreira, E.J.G. & Zuanon, J.A.S. (2006) Peixes comerciais de Manaus. Report. Ibama/AM, ProVárzea, Manaus, Brazil.
Schwartzman, S. (1989) Extractive reserves: the rubber tappers’ strategy for sustainable use of the Amazon rain forest. In: Fragile lands of Latin America: the Research for Sustainable Uses, ed. Browder, J. O., pp. 151163. Boulder, CO, USA: Westview Press.
SDS (2010) Plano de gestão da Reserva de Desenvolvimento Sustentavel de Uacari. Série Técnica Planos de Gestão, Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Sustentàvel, Carauari, Brazil.
Stoian, D. (2005) Making the best of two worlds: rural and peri-urban livelihood options sustained by nontimber forest products from the Bolivian Amazon. World Development 33: 14731490.
Takasaki, Y., Barham, B.L. & Coomes, O.T. (2001) Amazonian peasants, rain forest use, and income generation: the role of wealth and geographical factors. Society and Natural Resources 14: 291308.
Ticktin, T. (2004) The ecological implications of harvesting non-timber forest products. Journal of Applied Ecology 41: 1121.
Vadjunec, J.M. & Rocheleau, D. (2009) Beyond forest cover: land use and biodiversity in rubber trail forests of the Chico Mendes Extractive Reserve. Ecology and Society 14: 29.
Viana, V. (2008) Bolsa Floresta (Forest Conservation Allowance): an innovative mechanism to promote health in traditional communities in the Amazon. Estudos Avançados 22: 64.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed