No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Evaluating guidelines as key components of conservation policies: a conceptual framework and a pilot application
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 March 2024
Summary
Guidelines for managers of protected areas are an important component of conservation policies, on a par with large-scale frameworks and vehicles for conservation funding. In line with the recent literature proposing evaluations of conservation actions or political strategies to improve them, here we use an innovative, hybrid methodology, based both on an interpretative approach anchored in social sciences and a quantitative literature review, to identify available frameworks for evaluating conservation guidelines. The main result of this analysis is that the relevant literature in conservation is sparse and heterogeneous, but a relevant encompassing framework is provided by the literature in decision sciences based on the policy analytics framework. This evaluation framework consists of three criteria: scientific credibility, operationality and legitimacy. We then implement a pilot application by evaluating guidelines currently used in France to support all of the actors involved in protected areas management. The study concludes that these guidelines are plagued by significant weaknesses that could be overcome by implementing relevant participatory processes.
Keywords
- Type
- Research Paper
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Foundation for Environmental Conservation
References
Alder, J (1996) Have tropical marine protected areas worked? An initial analysis of their success. Coastal Management 24: 97–114.Google Scholar
Allen, L, Holland, KK, Holland, H, Tome’, S, Nabaala, M, Seno, S et al. (2019) Expanding staff voice in protected area management effectiveness assessments within Kenya’s Maasai Mara National Reserve. Environmental Management 63: 46–59.Google Scholar
Álvarez-Fernández, I, Fernández, N, Sánchez-Carnero, N, Freire, J (2017) The management performance of marine protected areas in the north-east Atlantic Ocean. Marine Policy 76: 159–168.Google Scholar
Álvarez-Fernández, I, Freire, J, Naya, I, Fernández, N, Sánchez-Carnero, N (2020a) Failures in the design and implementation of management plans of marine protected areas: an empirical analysis for the North-east Atlantic Ocean. Ocean & Coastal Management 192: 105178.Google Scholar
Álvarez-Fernández, I, Freire, J, Sánchez-Carnero, N (2020b) Low-quality management of marine protected areas in the north-east Atlantic. Marine Policy 117: 103922.Google Scholar
Ananda, J, Proctor, W (2013) Collaborative approaches to water management and planning: an institutional perspective. Ecological Economics 86: 97–106.Google Scholar
Anthamatten, P., Hazen, H. (2007) Unnatural selection: an analysis of the ecological representativeness of natural world heritage sites. The Professional Geographer 59: 256–
268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00611.x
Google Scholar
Anthony, BP, Shestackova, E (2015) Do global indicators of protected area management effectiveness make sense? A case study from Siberia. Environmental Management 56: 176–192.Google Scholar
Apitz, SE (2008) Adaptive management principles and sediment management: a call for discussions. Journal of Soils and Sediments 8: 359–362.Google Scholar
Arlettaz, R, Schaub, M, Fournier, J, Reichlin, TS, Sierro, A, Watson, JEM et al. (2010) From publications to public actions: when conservation biologists bridge the gap between research and implementation. BioScience 60: 835–842.Google Scholar
Arpin, I (2019) The rise of planning in nature conservation and the practitioners’ approach to conflicts. The inspiring case of the northern French Alps nature reserves. Journal for Nature Conservation 48: 54–60.Google Scholar
Arpin, I, Cosson, A (2021) Seeking legitimacy in European biodiversity conservation policies: the case of French national parks. Environmental Science & Policy 116: 181–187.Google Scholar
Ayivor, JS, Gordon, C, Tobin, GA, Ntiamoa-Baidu, Y (2020) Evaluation of management effectiveness of protected areas in the Volta Basin, Ghana: perspectives on the methodology for evaluation, protected area financing and community participation. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 22: 239–255.Google Scholar
Barker, A, Stockdale, A (2008) Out of the wilderness? Achieving sustainable development within Scottish national parks. Journal of Environmental Management 88: 181–193.Google Scholar
Barreto, GC, Di Domenico, M, Medeiros, RP (2020) Human dimensions of marine protected areas and small-scale fisheries management: a review of the interpretations. Marine Policy 119: 104040.Google Scholar
Baylis, K, Honey-Rosés, J, Börner, J, Corbera, E, Ezzine-de-Blas, D, Ferraro, PJ, et al. (2015). Mainstreaming impact evaluation in nature conservation. Conservation Letters 9: 58–
64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, J, Böller, M, Erhardt, A, Schwanghart, W (2014) Spatial bias in the GBIF database and its effect on modeling species’ geographic distributions. Ecological Informatics 19: 10–15.Google Scholar
Bennett, NJ, Roth, R, Klain, SC, Chan, K, Christie, P, Clark, DA et al. (2017) Conservation social science: understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biological Conservation 205: 93–108.Google Scholar
Bormann, BT, Haynes, RW, Martin, JR (2007) Adaptive management of forest ecosystems: did some rubber hit the road? BioScience 57: 186–191.Google Scholar
Bottrill, MC, Hockings, M, Possingham, HP (2011) In pursuit of knowledge: addressing barriers to effective conservation evaluation. Ecology and Society 16: 14.Google Scholar
Bottrill, MC, Pressey, RL (2012) The effectiveness and evaluation of conservation planning: evaluation and conservation planning. Conservation Letters 5: 407–420.Google Scholar
Bouyssou, D, Marchant, T, Pirlot, M, Perny, P, Tsoukiàs, A, Vincke, P (2000) Evaluation and Decision Models: A Critical Perspective. Boston, MA, USA: Springer US.Google Scholar
Choulak, M, Marage, D, Gisbert, M, Paris, M, Meinard, Y (2019) A meta-decision-analysis approach to structure operational and legitimate environmental policies – with an application to wetland prioritization. Science of the Total Environment 655: 384–394.Google Scholar
Claudet, J, Pelletier, D (2004) Marine protected areas and artificial reefs: a review of the interactions between management and scientific studies. Aquatic Living Resources 17: 129–138.Google Scholar
Courrau, J, Dudley, N, Hockings, M, Leverington, F, Stolton, S (2006) Evaluating Effectiveness: A Framework for Assessing Management Effectiveness of Protected Areas. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
De Marchi, G, Lucertini, G, Tsoukiàs, A (2016) From evidence-based policy making to policy analytics. Annals of Operations Research 236: 15–38.Google Scholar
Dubois, NS, Gomez, A, Carlson, S, Russell, D (2020) Bridging the research–implementation gap requires engagement from practitioners. Conservation Science and Practice 2: e134.Google Scholar
Ernoul, L, Beck, N, Cohez, D, Perennou, C, Thibault, M, Willm, L et al. (2015) Trends in management plans and guides: 25 years of experience from southern France. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 58: 1096–1112.Google Scholar
Ervin, J (2003) WWF rapid assessment and prioritization of protected area management (RAPPAM) methodology. Gland, Switzerland: WWF [www document]. URL https://wwfeu.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/rappam.pdf
Google Scholar
Evans, D (2012) Building the European Union’s Natura 2000 network. Nature Conservation 1: 11–26.Google Scholar
Fedorov, NI, Muldashev, AA, Martynenko, VB, Baisheva, EZ, Shirokikh, PS, Elizaryeva, OA et al. (2020) Identifying highly diverse areas of rare plant species as a basis for assessing representativeness and improving the network of protected areas. Contemporary Problems of Ecology 13: 418–428.Google Scholar
Ferraro, PJ, Pattanayak, SK (2006) Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments. PLoS Biology 4: e105.Google Scholar
Folke, C, Hahn, T, Olsson, P, Norberg, J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30: 441–473.Google Scholar
García-Montes, N, Arnanz Monreal, L (2019) Metodologías participativas para la planificación de la sostenibilidad ambiental local. El caso de la Agenda 21. Empiria. Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales (epub ahead of print) doi: 10.5944/empiria.44.2019.25354.Google Scholar
Geldmann, J, Barnes, M, Coad, L, Craigie, ID, Hockings, M, Burgess, ND (2013) Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines. Biological Conservation 161: 230–238.Google Scholar
Grantham, HS, Bode, M, McDonald-Madden, E, Game, ET, Knight, AT (2009) Effective conservation planning requires learning and adaptation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8: 431–
437.
Google Scholar
Hallam, CD, Wintle, BA, Kujala, H, Whitehead, AL, Nicholson, E (2020) Measuring impacts on species with models and metrics of varying ecological and computational complexity. Conservation Biology 34: 1512–1524.Google Scholar
Hockings, M (1998) Evaluating management of protected areas: integrating planning and evaluation. Environmental Management 22: 337–345.Google Scholar
Hockings, M, Cook, CN, Carter, RW, James, R (2009) Accountability, reporting, or management improvement? Development of a state of the parks assessment system in New South Wales, Australia. Environmental Management 43: 1013–1025.Google Scholar
Hockings, M, Stolton, S, Dudley, N (2000) Evaluating Effectiveness: A Framework for Assessing the Management of Protected Areas. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN [www document]. URL https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/pag-014.pdf
Google Scholar
Holling, CS (1996) Surprise for science, resilience for ecosystems, and incentives for people. Ecological Applications 6: 733–735.Google Scholar
Jarić, I, Quétier, F, Meinard, Y (2019) Procrustean beds and empty boxes: on the magic of creating environmental data. Biological Conservation 237: 248–252.Google Scholar
Jeanmougin, M, Dehais, C, Meinard, Y (2017) Mismatch between habitat science and habitat directive: lessons from the French (counter) example: evaluating the European habitat policy. Conservation Letters 10: 634–644.Google Scholar
Jones, PJS (1994) A review and analysis of the objectives of marine nature reserves. Ocean & Coastal Management 24: 149–178.Google Scholar
Knight, AT, Cowling, RM, Rouget, M, Balmford, A, Lombard, AT, Campbell, BM (2008) Knowing but not doing: selecting priority conservation areas and the research–implementation gap. Conservation Biology 22: 610–617.Google Scholar
Kovács, E, Kelemen, E, Kiss, G, Kalóczkai, Á, Fabók, V, Mihók, B et al. (2017) Evaluation of participatory planning: lessons from Hungarian Natura 2000 management planning processes. Journal of Environmental Management 204: 540–550.Google Scholar
Linares Quero, A, Iragui Yoldi, U, Gava, O, Schwarz, G, Povellato, A, Astrain, C (2022) Assessment of the Common Agricultural Policy 2014–2020 in supporting agroecological transitions: a comparative study of 15 cases across Europe. Sustainability 14: 9261.Google Scholar
Lu, D-J, Kao, C-W, Chao, C-L (2012) Evaluating the management effectiveness of five protected areas in Taiwan using WWF’s RAPPAM. Environmental Management 50: 272–282.Google Scholar
Luyet, V, Schlaepfer, R, Parlange, MB, Buttler, A (2012) A framework to implement stakeholder participation in environmental projects. Journal of Environmental Management 111: 213–219.Google Scholar
Maestro, M, Chica-Ruiz, JA, Pérez-Cayeiro, ML (2020) Analysis of marine protected area management: the Marine Park of the Azores (Portugal). Marine Policy 119: 104104.Google Scholar
McRae, L, Deinet, S, Freeman, R (2017) The diversity-weighted living planet index: controlling for taxonomic bias in a global biodiversity indicator. PLoS ONE 12: e0169156.Google Scholar
Meinard, Y (2017) What is a legitimate conservation policy? Biological Conservation 213: 115–123.Google Scholar
Meinard, Y, Barreteau, O, Boschet, C, Daniell, KA, Ferrand, N, Girard, S et al. (2021) What is policy analytics? An exploration of 5 years of environmental management applications. Environmental Management 67: 886–900.Google Scholar
Meyer, C, Kreft, H, Guralnick, R, Jetz, W (2015) Global priorities for an effective information basis of biodiversity distributions. Nature Communications 6: 8221.Google Scholar
Milla–Figueras, D, Schmiing, M, Amorim, P, Horta e Costa, B, Afonso, P, Tempera, F (2020) Evaluating seabed habitat representativeness across a diverse set of marine protected areas on the Mid–Atlantic Ridge. Biodiversity and Conservation 29: 1153–1175.Google Scholar
Mingarro, M, Lobo, JM (2018) Environmental representativeness and the role of emitter and recipient areas in the future trajectory of a protected area under climate change. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 41: 333–344.Google Scholar
Morris, RKA, Bennett, T, Blyth-Skyrme, R, Barham, PJ, Ball, A (2014) Managing Natura 2000 in the marine environment – an evaluation of the effectiveness of ‘management schemes’ in England. Ocean & Coastal Management 87: 40–51.Google Scholar
Muñoz, L, Hausner, V (2013) What do the IUCN categories really protect? A case study of the alpine regions in Spain. Sustainability 5: 2367–2388.Google Scholar
Osorio, A, Schmitt, L, Badariotti, D, Meinard, Y (2022) Mise en œuvre d’un processus de « participation contre-argumentative » dans la gestion et la restauration des milieux fluviaux : retour d’expérience dans une Réserve Naturelle Nationale rhénane. Géocarrefour 96: 19984.Google Scholar
Osorio, A, Schmitt, L, Badariotti, D, Meinard, Y (2023) Améliorer la gestion des espaces naturels par la participation. Une analyse du guide français pour l’élaboration des plans de gestion. VertigO (epub ahead of print) doi: 10.4000/vertigo.40230.Google Scholar
Paletto, A, Hamunen, K, De Meo, I (2015) Social network analysis to support stakeholder analysis in participatory forest planning. Society & Natural Resources 28: 1108–1125.Google Scholar
Pe’er, G, Mihoub, J-B, Dislich, C, Matsinos, Y (2014) Towards a different attitude to uncertainty. Nature Conservation 8: 95–114.Google Scholar
Pearson, DE, Clark, TJ, Hahn, PG (2022) Evaluating unintended consequences of intentional species introductions and eradications for improved conservation management. Conservation Biology 36: e13734.Google Scholar
Piwowarczyk, J, Wróbel, B (2016) Determinants of legitimate governance of marine Natura 2000 sites in a post-transition European Union country: a case study of Puck Bay, Poland. Marine Policy 71: 310–317.Google Scholar
Pranckutė, R (2021) Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: the titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications 9: 12.Google Scholar
Sanderson, FJ, Pople, RG, Ieronymidou, C, Burfield IJ, Gregory RD, Willis SG et al. (2015). Assessing the performance of EU nature legislation in protecting target bird species in an era of climate change: impacts of EU nature legislation. Conservation Letter, 9, 172–
180.Google Scholar
Santana-Medina, N, Franco-Maass, S, Sánchez-Vera, E, Imbernon, J, Nava-Bernal, G (2013) Participatory generation of sustainability indicators in a natural protected area of Mexico. Ecological Indicators 25: 1–9.Google Scholar
Santos, CZ, Schiavetti, A (2014) Assessment of the management in Brazilian marine extractive reserves. Ocean & Coastal Management 93: 26–36.Google Scholar
Schwartz, MW, Cook, CN, Pressey, RL, Pullin, AS, Runge, MC, Salafsky, N et al. (2018) Decision support frameworks and tools for conservation: decision support for conservation. Conservation Letters 11: e12385.Google Scholar
Scianna, C, Niccolini, F, Bianchi, CN, Guidetti, P (2018) Applying organization science to assess the management performance of marine protected areas: an exploratory study. Journal of Environmental Management 223: 175–184.Google Scholar
Sendzimir, J, Magnuszewski, P, Gunderson, L (2018) Adaptive management of riverine socio-ecological systems. In Schmutz, S, Sendzimir, J (eds), Riverine Ecosystem Management: Science for Governing towards a Sustainable Future (pp. 301–324). New York, NY, USA: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Stolton, S, Dudley, N, Belokurov, A, Deguignet, M, Burgess, ND, Hockings, M et al. (2019) Lessons learned from 18 years of implementing the Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT): a perspective from the METT developers and implementers. PARKS 25: 79–92.Google Scholar
Stori, FT, Shinoda, DC, Turra, A (2019) Sewing a blue patchwork: an analysis of marine policies implementation in the southeast of Brazil. Ocean & Coastal Management 168: 322–339.Google Scholar
Sutherland, WJ, Taylor, NG, MacFarlane, D, Amano, T, Christie, AP, Dicks, LV et al. (2019) Building a tool to overcome barriers in research–implementation spaces: the Conservation Evidence database. Biological Conservation 238: 108199.Google Scholar
Troudet, J, Grandcolas, P, Blin, A, Vignes-Lebbe, R, Legendre, F (2017) Taxonomic bias in biodiversity data and societal preferences. Scientific Reports 7: 9132.Google Scholar
Turnhout, E, Metze, T, Wyborn, C, Klenk, N, Louder, E (2020) The politics of co-production: participation, power, and transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 42: 15–21.Google Scholar
Watson, JEM, Dudley, N, Segan, DB, Hockings, M (2014) The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature 515: 67–73.Google Scholar
Wyatt, S, Merrill, S, Natcher, D (2011) Ecosystem management and forestry planning in Labrador: how does Aboriginal involvement affect management plans? Canadian Journal of Forest Research 41: 2247–2258.Google Scholar
Yang, W, Ma, K, Kreft, H (2013) Geographical sampling bias in a large distributional database and its effects on species richness–environment models. Journal of Biogeography 40: 1415–1426.Google Scholar
Young, JC, Jordan, A, Searle, KR, Butler, A, Chapman, DS, Simmons, P, Watt, AD (2013) Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation? Biological Conservation 158: 359–370.Google Scholar
Osorio et al. supplementary material
Osorio et al. supplementary material
File
6.1 MB