Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Evaluating the performance of a decade of Save The Tiger Fund's investments to save the world's last wild tigers


This is the first attempt to analyse the performance of US 12.6 million invested by Save The Tiger Fund (STF) in more than 250 tiger conservation grants in 13 tiger-range countries. We devised a simple implementation evaluation method to assess performance on an ordinal scale using archival documents from project grant files. Performance was scored based on whether the grantee managed to achieve what they set out to do as articulated in their project proposal. On average, STF grantee project outputs exceeded their original objectives, but many confounding variables made it difficult to determine the ecological outcomes of grantees’ conservation actions. Successful projects were usually collaborative in nature with high community visibility and support, their results were disseminated effectively, and they informed policy, measured outputs, were grounded by strong sound science, supported by government agencies, attracted new donors and delivered results even when political factors created difficult working environments. The poorly performing projects were associated with one or more of the following factors: poor tracking of results, deviation from the proposal, poorly defined goals, lack of capacity, poor evaluation practices, lack of political support, weak transparency, work at inappropriate scales or purchase of high-tech equipment that was never used.

Corresponding author
*Correspondence: Dr Brian Gratwicke Tel: +1 202 857 5156 e-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

N. Baral & J.T. Heinen (2006) The Maoists people's war and conservation in Nepal. Politics and the Life Sciences 24 (1–2): 211.

E. Bernhardt , M. Palmer , J. Allan , G. Alexander , K. Barnas , S. Brooks , J. Carr , S. Clayton , C. Dahm & J. Follstad-Shah (2005) Synthesizing US river restoration efforts. Science 308: 636637.

C. Carbone , S. Christie , K. Conforti , T. Coulson , N. Franklin , J.R. Ginsberg , M. Griffiths , J. Holden , K. Kawanishi , M. Kinnaird , R. Laidlaw , A. Lynam , D.W. Macdonald , D. Martyr , C. McDougal , L. Nath , T. O'Brien , J. Seidensticker , D.J.L. Smith , M. Sunquist , R. Tilson & Wan W.N. Shahruddin (2001) The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals. Animal Conservation 4: 7579.

M. Hockings (2003) Systems for assessing the effectiveness of management in protected areas. BioScience 53: 823832.

K.U. Karanth (1995) Estimating tiger Panthera tigris populations from camera-trap data using capture recapture models. Biological Conservation 71: 333338.

K.U. Karanth , R.S. Chundawat , J.D. Nichols & N.S. Kumar (2004) Estimation of tiger densities in the tropical dry forests of Panna, Central India, using photographic capture–recapture sampling. Animal Conservation 7: 285290.

K.U. Karanth , J.D. Nichols , J. Seidensticker , E. Dinerstein , J.L.D. Smith , C. McDougal , A.J.T. Johnsingh , R.S. Chundawat & V. Thapar (2003) Science deficiency in conservation practice: the monitoring of tiger populations in India. Animal Conservation 6: 141146.

D. Kleiman , R. Reading , B. Miller , T. Clark , J. Scott , J. Robinson , R. Wallace , R. Cabin & F. Felleman (2000) Improving the evaluation of conservation programs. Conservation Biology 14: 356365.

J. Parrish , D. Braun & R. Unnasch (2003) Are we conserving what we say we are? Measuring ecological integrity within protected areas. BioScience 53: 851860.

H. Rauscher (1999) Ecosystem management decision support for federal forests in the United States: a review. Forest Ecology and Management 114: 173197.

K.H. Redford , P. Coppolillo , E.W. Sanderson , G. Fonseca , E. Dinerstein , C. Groves , G. Mace , S. Maginnis , R.A. Mittermeier , R. Noss , D. Olson , J. Robinson , A. Vedder & M. Wright (2003) Mapping the conservation landscape. Conservation Biology 17: 116131.

H. Rittel & M. Webber (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4: 155169.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 20 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 113 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.