Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T17:20:30.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation in Nature Conservation Decision-making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Nigel J. Roome
Nigel J. Roome
Affiliation:
School of Studies in Environmental Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire BD7 1DP, England, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper considers alternative approaches to the evaluation of Nature conservation resources as part of the overall process of establishing Nature conservation priorities. The techniques available for evaluation are seen to differ in their ideological base and methodology, and in the relative importance which they attach to physical and ecological features. This lack of consistency means that existing techniques only represent a partial basis for determining conservation priorities. Furthermore, the assumptions on which evaluation techniques are based tend not to be stated explicitly and often appear not to have been substantiated. These inconsistencies are due in part to ambiguity concerning the objectives of conservation, in part to the lack of research into the relationship between human demands and the features of Nature conservation resources, and in part to uncertainty as to the position of evaluation in the conservation priority-setting process.

A model of this process for setting conservation priorities is presented. It delimits ecological evaluation as an objective, value-free element in the priority-setting process—where ecological evaluation is seen to provide information which aids decision-makers in the more value-laden socio-economic elements of conservation priority-setting. The model implies that the objective and subjective elements in existing evaluation techniques are not sufficiently explicit to ensure consistency in decision-making.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1984 , pp. 247 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adamus, P.R. & Clough, G.C. (1978). Evaluating species for protection in natural areas. Biol. Conserv., 13, pp. 165–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, R.G.H. & Shaw, M.V. (1973). A standardised procedure for ecological survey. J. Environmental Management, 1, pp. 239–58.Google Scholar
Everett, R.D. (1977). A method of investigating the importance of wildlife to countryside visitors. Environmental Conservation, 4(3), pp. 227–31, fig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, R.D. (1978). The wildlife preferences shown by countryside visitors. Biol. Conserv., 14, pp. 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, R.D. (1979). The monetary value of the recreational benefit of wildlife. J. Environmental Management, 8, pp. 203–13.Google Scholar
Gehlbach, F.R. (1975). Investigation, evaluation and priority ranking of natural areas. Biol. Conserv., 8, pp. 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, F.B. (1975). The evaluation of ecological resources in the countryside for conservation purposes. Biol. Conserv., 8, pp. 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodfellow, S. & Peterken, G.F. (1981). A method for survey and assessment of woodland for nature conservation using maps and species lists: the example of Norfolk woodlands. Biol. Conserv., 21, pp. 177–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helliwell, D.R. (1969). Valuation of wildlife resources. Regional Studies, 3, pp. 41–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helliwell, D.R. (1974). The value of vegetation for conservation: Four land areas in Britain. J. Environmental Management, 2, pp. 51–74.Google Scholar
Idle, E. (1980). Management plans for. nature conservation. Pp. 4–10 in Recreation Ecology Research Group Meeting November 1980. University of York, York, England, UK: 49 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Kreimer, A. (1977). Environmental preferences: a critical analysis of some research methodologies. J. Leisure Research, 9, pp. 88–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nature Conservancy Council [cited as NCC] (1975). First Report of the Nature Conservancy Council. H.M.S.O., London, England, UK: 116 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
NCC—see Nature Conservancy Council.Google Scholar
O'Connor, F.B. (1974). The ecological basis for conservation. Pp. 87–98 in Conservation in Practice (Ed. Warren, A. & Goldsmith, F.B.). Wiley, London, England, UK: xix + 512 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Ploeg, S.W.F. van der (1980). Nature conservation in the Netherlands: some facts, problems and research needs. Pp. 41–6 in Wildlife Conservation and Recreation (Ed. Fishwick, A.). (Recreation Ecology Research Group Report No. 4.) Lake District Special Planning Board, Kendal, England, UK: 108 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Ploeg, S.W.F. van der & Vlijm, L. (1978). Ecological evaluation, nature conservation, and land-use planning with particular reference to methods used in the Netherlands. Biol. Conserv., 14, pp. 197–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliffe, D.A. (Ed.) (1977). A Nature Conservation Review, Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, UK: xvi + 401 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Robinson, D.G., Wager, J.F., Laurie, I.C. & Traill, A.L. (1976). Landscape Evaluation. University of Manchester, Manchester, England, UK: 303 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Roome, N.J. (1980). Cost-benefit Analysis: The Social Evaluation of National Nature Reserves. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK: iii + 455 pp. (typescript).Google Scholar
Spellerberg, I.F. (1981). Ecological Evaluation for Conservation. (Studies in Biology, No. 133.) Edward Arnold, London, England, UK: iii + 60 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Tans, W. (1974). Priority ranking of biotic natural areas. Mich. Bot., 13, pp. 31–9.Google Scholar
Tubbs, C.R. & Blackwood, J.W. (1971). Ecological evaluation of land for planning purposes. Biol. Conserv., 3, pp. 169–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usher, M.B. & Margules, C. (1981). Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: a review. Biol. Conserv., 28, pp. 79–110.Google Scholar
Wood, J.B. & Warren, A. (Ed.) (1978). A Handbook for the Preparation of Management Plans, Conservation Course Format Revision 2. (Discussion Papers in Conservation No. 18.) University College, London, England, UK: ii + 41 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Wright, D.F. (1977). A site evaluation scheme for use in the assessment of potential nature reserves. Biol. Conserv., 11, pp. 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yapp, W.B. (1973). Ecological evaluation of a linear landscape. Biol. Conserv., 5, pp. 45–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar