Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Access
  • Open access
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Cavanagh, Rachel D. Hill, Simeon L. Knowland, Cheryl A. and Grant, Susie M. 2016. Stakeholder perspectives on ecosystem-based management of the Antarctic krill fishery. Marine Policy, Vol. 68, p. 205.


From strategic ambiguity to technical reference points in the Antarctic krill fishery: the worst journey in the world?

  • SIMEON L. HILL (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 15 April 2013

The goals of ecosystem based management (EBM) are strategically ambiguous, meaning that they require interpretation to identify objectives for ecosystem state. Ecosystem states that are useful for achieving such objectives are known as reference points. Soft reference points specify both a state and a probability of the ecosystem being in that state. They are used with simulation models to identify management measures for which the risk of the ecosystem entering an undesirable state is below a specified level. The Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) is responsible for the EBM of Antarctic krill fisheries. CCAMLR used soft reference points for the krill stock in the Scotia Sea and southern Drake Passage to set a regional catch limit. However, this catch limit needs spatial subdivision to protect predators from localized depletion. Model-based evaluations of different options for subdividing the catch limit used illustrative reference points to assess the depletion risk to multiple predators. This study demonstrates that the apparent risk is sensitive to the choice of reference point and method for aggregating modelled predators. EBM practitioners and stakeholders need to be aware that these factors could therefore bias comparisons of management measures. Nonetheless, qualitative distinctions between different spatial subdivision options are relatively consistent except at high levels of aggregation and extreme reference points. This study also demonstrates a lack of generality in the relationship between current and future ecosystem state. Thus, the EBM goal of maintaining ecosystem resilience implies different reference points for the current state of different ecosystem components. Despite early progress in defining soft reference points for the krill stock, CCAMLR has not yet defined reference points for krill predators. Structured dialogue aimed at identifying collective objectives might be necessary to achieve further progress in CCAMLR and other EBM organizations.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      From strategic ambiguity to technical reference points in the Antarctic krill fishery: the worst journey in the world?
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      From strategic ambiguity to technical reference points in the Antarctic krill fishery: the worst journey in the world?
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      From strategic ambiguity to technical reference points in the Antarctic krill fishery: the worst journey in the world?
      Available formats
The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence <>. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
Corresponding author
*Correspondence: Dr Simeon Hill e-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

A. Atkinson , V. Siegel , E.A. Pakhomov , M.J. Jessopp & V. Loeb (2009) A re-appraisal of the total biomass and annual production of Antarctic krill. Deep-Sea Research I 56: 727740.

A.J. Constable , W.K. de la Mare , D.J. Agnew , I. Everson & D. Miller (2000) Managing fisheries to conserve the Antarctic marine ecosystem: practical implementation of the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR). ICES Journal of Marine Science 57: 778791.

W.K. de la Mare (2005) Marine ecosystem-based management as a hierarchical control system. Marine Policy 29: 5768.

B. deYoung , M. Heath , F. Werner , F. Chai , B. Megrey & P. Monfray (2004) Challenges of modelling ocean basin ecosystems. Science 304: 14631466.

E.M. Eisenberg (1984) Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs 51: 227242.

H. Flores , A. Atkinson , S. Kawaguchi , B.A. Krafft , G. Milinevsky , S. Nicol , C. Reiss , G.A. Tarling , R. Werner , E. Bravo Rebolledo , V. Cirelli , J. Cuzin-Roudy , S. Fielding , J.J. Groeneveld , M. Haraldsson , A. Lombana , E. Marschoff , B. Meyer , E.A. Pakhomov , E. Rombolá , K. Schmidt , V. Siegel , M. Teschke , H. Tonkes , J.Y. Toullec , P.N. Trathan , N. Tremblay , A. Van de Putte , J.A. van Franeker & T. Werner (2012) Impact of climate change on Antarctic krill. Marine Ecology Progress Series 458: 119.

E.A. Fulton , A.D.M. Smith & C.R. Johnson (2003) Effect of complexity on marine ecosystem models. Marine Ecology Progress Series 253: 116.

S.L. Hill (2013) Prospects for a sustainable increase in the availability of long chain omega 3s: lessons from the Antarctic krill fishery. In: Omega-6/3 Fatty Acids: Functions, Sustainability Strategies and Perspectives. ed. F. De Meester, R.F. Watson & S. Zibadi, pp. 267296. New York, NY, USA: Springer Science & Business Media.

S.L. Hill , K. Reid , & A.W. North (2005) Recruitment of mackerel icefish (Champsocephalus gunnari) at South Georgia indicated by predator diets and its relationship with sea surface temperature. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 62: 25302537.

S.L. Hill , E.J. Murphy , K. Reid , P.N. Trathan & A.J. Constable (2006) Modelling Southern Ocean ecosystems: krill, the food-web, and the impacts of fishing. Biological Reviews 81: 581608.

S.L.Hill , G.M.Watters , A.E.Punt , M.K.McAllister , C.LeQuere & J.Turner (2007 a) Model uncertainty in the ecosystem approach to fisheries. Fish and Fisheries 8: 315333.

J.D. Jacquet , D. Pauly , D. Ainley , P. Dayton , S. Holt & J. Jackson (2010) Seafood stewardship in crisis. Nature 467: 2829.

R.M. Laws (1977) Seals and whales of the Southern Ocean. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 279: 8196.

M. Lierman & R. Hilborn (2001) Depensation: evidence, models and implications. Fish and Fisheries 2: 3358.

J.S. Link (2010) Ecosystem-based Fisheries Management. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

J.S.Link , T.F.Ihde , C.J.Harvey , S.K.Gaichas , J.C.Field , J.K.T.Brodziak , H.M.Townsend & R.M.Peterman (2012) Dealing with uncertainty in ecosystem models: the paradox of use for living resources. Progress in Oceanography 102: 102114.

J.K. Pinnegar , J.L. Blanchard , S. Mackinson , R.D. Scott & D.E. Duplisea (2005). Aggregation and removal of weak-links in food-web models: system stability and recovery from disturbance. Ecological Modelling 184: 229248.

É.E. Plagányi & D.S. Butterworth (2012) The Scotia Sea krill fishery and its possible impacts on dependent predators: modelling localized depletion of prey. Ecological Applications 22: 748761.

R.A. Rademeyer , É.E. Plagányi & D.S. Butterworth (2007). Tips and tricks in designing management procedures. ICES Journal of Marine Science 64: 618625.

A.D. Smith , C.J. Brown , C.M. Bulman , E.A. Fulton , P. Johnson , I.C. Kaplan , H. Lozano-Montes , S. Mackinson , M. Marzloff , L.J. Shannon , Y.J. Shin & J. Tam (2011) Impacts of fishing low-trophic level species on marine ecosystems. Science 333: 11471150.

B.K.Sovacool & K.E.Siman (2011) Revoking a license to krill: what the United States can do to save fish stocks in Antarctica. Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy 14 (1): 150.

R.B. Thomson , D.S. Butterworth , I.L. Boyd & J.P. Croxall (2000) Modeling the consequences of Antarctic krill harvesting on Antarctic fur seals. Ecological Applications 10: 18061819.

C.M. Waluda , S.L. Hill , H.J. Peat & P.N. Trathan (2012) Diet variability and reproductive performance of macaroni penguins Eudyptes chrysolophus at Bird Island, South Georgia. Marine Ecology Progress Series 466: 261274.

B. Worm , R. Hilborn , J.K. Baum , T.A. Branch , J.S. Collie , C. Costello , M.J. Fogarty , E.A. Fulton , J.A. Hutchings , S. Jennings , O.P. Jensen , H.K. Lotze , P.A. Mace , T.R. McClanahan , C. Minto , S.R. Palumbi , A.M. Parma , D. Ricard , A.A. Rosenberg , R. Watson & D. Zeller (2009) Rebuilding global fisheries. Science 325: 578585.

M.A. Zacharias & J.C. Roff (2001) Use of focal species in marine conservation and management: a review and critique. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 11: 5976.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *