Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Public preferences for species conservation: choosing between lethal control, habitat protection and no action

  • MICHELLE L. LUTE (a1) (a2) and SHAHZEEN Z. ATTARI (a1)
Summary

Despite increasing support for conservation efforts, humans exert strong negative forces on nature and disagree over the management of these effects. Conflicts over conservation policy may reflect evolving opinions about how people ought to conserve species and whether to intervene in various processes. To understand public preferences for conservation in the USA, we measured support for various strategies in five case studies, where we pitted one species against another in simplified but realistic scenarios. Among our online convenience sample of 1040 participants, we found the majority of participants favoured habitat protection in all but one case, and there was little acceptance of lethal control across all cases. The results reveal that habitat protection preferences positively relate to considerations of moral principles and ecosystems and negatively relate to economic and practical considerations. Older, conservative and male participants were less likely to support habitat protection and more likely to support no action. The results suggest broad support for holistic nature conservation that benefits both people and nature and highlight areas where current wildlife management may not align with public preferences. Controversy may continue until wildlife management policies are consistent with societal values and address moral and ecosystem considerations at multiple levels.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence: Dr. Michelle L. Lute Tel: +1 406 848 4910 e-mail: michelle.lute@gmail.com
Footnotes
Hide All

Supplementary material can be found online at http://doi.org/10.1017/S037689291600045X

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Ansolabehere, S. & Schaffner, B.F. (2014) Does survey mode still matter? Findings from a 2010 multi-mode comparison. Political Analysis 22: 285303.
Ari, E. & Yildiz, Z. (2014) Parallel lines assumption in ordinal logistic regression and analysis approaches. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Scientific Research 1: 823.
Baruch-Mordo, S., Breck, S.W., Wilson, K.R. & Broderick, J. (2011) The carrot or the stick? Evaluation of education and enforcement as management tools for human–wildlife conflicts. PLoS One 6: e15681.
Bell, J., Huber, J. & Viscusi, W.K. (2011) Survey mode effects on valuation of environmental goods. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 8: 12221243.
Bode, M., Baker, C.M. & Plein, M. (2015) Eradicating down the food chain: optimal multispecies eradication schedules for a commonly encountered invaded island ecosystem. Journal of Applied Ecology 52: 571579.
Bourdeau, P. (2004) The man-nature relationship and environmental ethics. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 72: 915.
Brotherstone, H., Miles, A., Robb, K.A., Atkin, W. & Wardle, J. (2006) The impact of illustrations on public understanding of the aim of cancer screening. Patient Education and Counseling 63: 328335.
Browne-Nunez, C. (2002) Americans’ Attitudes toward Wolves and Wolf Reintroduction: An Annotated Bibliography. Denver, CO: US Geological Survey.
Carey, M. P., Sanderson, B. L., Barnas, K. A. & Olden, J. D. (2012) Native invaders – challenges for science, management, policy, and society. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10: 373381.
Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P.R., Barnosky, A.D., García, A., Pringle, R.M. & Palmer, T.M. (2015) Accelerated modern human-induced species losses: entering the sixth mass extinction. Science Advances 1: e1400253.
Chan, K.M.A., Pringle, R.M., Ranganathan, J., Boggs, C.L., Chan, Y.L., Ehrlich, P.R. et al. (2007) When agendas collide: human welfare and biological conservation. Conservation Biology 21: 5968.
Clark, J.L. (2015) Uncharismatic invasives. Environmental Humanities 6: 3439.
Conniff, R. (2014) A trophy hunt that's good for rhinos. New York Times, January 20, 2014.
Dickman, A.J., Hazzah, L., Carbone, C. & Durant, S.M. (2014) Carnivores, culture and ‘contagious conflict’: multiple factors influence perceived problems with carnivores in Tanzania's Ruaha landscape. Biological Conservation 178: 1927.
Doherty, T.S., Dickman, C.R., Nimmo, D.G. & Ritchie, E.G. (2015) Multiple threats, or multiplying the threats? Interactions between invasive predators and other ecological disturbances. Biological Conservation 190: 6068.
Dugger, K.M., Anthony, R.G. & Andrews, L.S. (2011) Transient dynamics of invasive competition: barred owls, spotted owls, habitat, and the demons of competition present. Ecological Applications 21: 24592468.
Eriksson, M., Sandström, C. & Ericsson, G. (2015) Direct experience and attitude change towards bears and wolves. Wildlife Biology 21: 131137.
Falk, A. & Szech, N. (2013) Morals and markets. Science 340: 707712.
Frey, U. (2014) Value assignment in experimental environmental ethics. In: Environmental Ethics: Toward an Empirical Moral Philosophy, eds. Luetge, C., usch, & Uh, M., pp. 112129. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
de Groot, M., Drenthen, M. & de Groot, W.T. (2011) Public visions of the human/nature relationship and their implications for environmental ethics. Environmental Ethics 33: 2544.
Haider, S. & Jax, K. (2007) The application of environmental ethics in biological conservation: a case study from the southernmost tip of the Americas. Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 25592573.
Heberlein, T.A. & Ericsson, G. (2005) Ties to the countryside: accounting for urbanites attitudes toward hunting, wolves, and wildlife. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 10: 213227.
Houts, P.S., Doak, C.C., Doak, L.G. & Loscalzo, M.J. (2006) The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Education and Counseling 61: 173190.
Jager, C., Nelson, M.P., Goralnik, L. & Gore, M.L. (2016) Michigan mute swan management: a case study to understand contentious natural resource management issues. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 21: 189202.
Kalnicky, E.A., Brunson, M.W. & Beard, K.H. (2014) A social–ecological systems approach to non-native species: habituation and its effect on management of coqui frogs in Hawaii. Biological Conservation 180: 187195.
Karp, D.S., Mendenhall, C.D., Callaway, E., Frishkoff, L.O., Kareiva, P.M., Ehrlich, P.R. & Daily, G.C. (2015) Confronting and resolving competing values behind conservation objectives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112: 1113211137.
Kellert, S.R. (1980) American attitudes toward and knowledge of animals. International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems 1: 87119.
Kellert, S.R., Black, M., Rush, C.R. & Bath, A.J. (1996) Human culture and large carnivore conservation in North America. Conservation Biology 10: 977990.
Kontogianni, A., Tourkolias, C., Machleras, A. & Skourtos, M. (2012) Service providing units, existence values and the valuation of endangered species: a methodological test. Ecological Economics 79: 97104.
Kwilosz, J.R. & Knutson, R.L. (1999) Prescribed fire management of Karner blue butterfly habitat at Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. Natural Areas Journal 19: 98108.
Lazenby, B.T., Mooney, N.J. & Dickman, C.R. (2014) Effects of low-level culling of feral cats in open populations: a case study from the forests of southern Tasmania. Wildlife Research 41: 407420.
Levine, N. & Knudson, T. (2012) Animals killed by Wildlife Services nationwide. The Sacramento Bee, April 28, 2012.
Lute, M.L., Bump, A. & Gore, M.L. (2014) Identity-driven differences in stakeholder concerns about hunting wolves. PLoS One 9: e114460.
Lute, M.L. & Gore, M.L. (2014) Stewardship as a path to cooperation? Exploring the role of identity in intergroup conflict among Michigan wolf stakeholders. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 19: 267279.
Lute, M.L., Navarrete, C.D., Nelson, M.P. & Gore, M.L. (2016) Assessing morals in conservation: the case of human–wolf conflict. Conservation Biology doi:10.1111/cobi.12731.
Madden, F. & McQuinn, B. (2014) Conservation's blind spot: the case for conflict transformation in wildlife conservation. Biological Conservation 178: 97106.
Marlow, N.J., Thomas, N.D., Williams, A.A.E., Macmahon, B., Lawson, J., Hitchen, Y. et al. (2015) Cats (Felis catus) are more abundant and are the dominant predator of woylies (Bettongia penicillata) after sustained fox (Vulpes vulpes) control. Australian Journal of Zoology 63: 1827.
McShane, T.O., Hirsch, P.D., Trung, T.C., Songorwa, A.N., Kinzig, A., Monteferri, B. et al. (2011) Hard choices: making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biological Conservation 144: 966972.
Mech, L.D. (2010) Consideration for developing wolf harvesting regulations in the contiguous United States. International Wolf 20: 410.
Messmer, T.A., Brunson, M.W., Reiter, D. & Hewitt, D. G. (1999) United States publics attitudes regarding predators and their management to enhance avian recruitment. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27: 7585.
Miller, T.R., Minteer, B.A. & Malan, L.C. (2011) The new conservation debate: the view from practical ethics. Biological Conservation 144: 948957.
Nelson, M.P. (2002) Introduction to environmental ethics. In: Biodiversity Project Ethics for a Small Planet: A Communications Handbook, pp. 4053. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press and the Biodiversity Project.
Nelson, M.P., Bruskotter, J.T., Vucetich, J.A. & Chapron, G. (2016) Emotions and the ethics of consequence in conservation decisions: lessons from Cecil the Lion. Conservation Letters 9: 302306.
Nelson, M.P. & Vucetich, J.A. (2012) Environmental ethics and wildlife management. In: Human Dimensions of Wildlife Management, eds. Decker, D.J., Riley, S.J. & Siemer, W.F., pp. 223237. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Nie, M. (2003) Drivers of natural resource-based political conflict. Policy Sciences 36: 307341.
Packer, C., Loveridge, A., Canney, S., Caro, T., Garnett, S.T., Pfeifer, M. et al. (2013) Conserving large carnivores: dollars and fence. Ecology Letters 16: 635641.
Ripple, W.J., Estes, J.A., Beschta, R.L., Wilmers, C.C., Ritchie, E.G., Hebblewhite, M. et al. (2014) Status and ecological effects of the world's largest carnivores. Science 343: 1241484.
Robinson, J.G. (2011) Ethical pluralism, pragmatism, and sustainability in conservation practice. Biological Conservation 144: 958965.
Sacchi, S., Riva, P., Brambilla, M. & Grasso, M. (2014) Moral reasoning and climate change mitigation: the deontological reaction toward the market-based approach. Journal of Environmental Psychology 38: 252261.
Safina, C. (2015) Beyond Words: What Animals Think and Feel. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.
Slagle, K.M., Bruskotter, J.T. & Wilson, R.S. (2012) The role of affect in public support and opposition to wolf management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 17: 4457.
Slovic, P. (2007) ‘If I look at the mass I will never act’: psychic numbing and genocide. Judgment and Decision Making 2: 7995.
Soulé, M. (2013) The ‘new conservation’. Conservation Biology 27: 895897.
Thøgersen, J. (2004) A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24: 93103.
Tisdell, C., Wilson, C. & Nantha, H.S. (2005) Association of public support for survival of wildlife species with their likeability. Anthrozoos 18: 160174.
U.S. Census Bureau (2010) U.S. Quickfacts [www document]. URL http://quickfacts.census.gov
Verbrugge, L.N., Van den Born, R.J.G. & Lenders, H.J. R. (2013) Exploring public perception of non-native species from a visions of nature perspective. Environmental Management 53: 15621573.
Vucetich, J.A., Bruskotter, J.T. & Nelson, M.P. (2015) Evaluating whether nature's intrinsic value is an axiom of or anathema to conservation. Conservation Biology 29: 321332.
Vucetich, J.A. & Nelson, M.P. (2007) What are 60 warblers worth? Killing in the name of conservation. Oikos 116: 12671278.
Way, J. & Bruskotter, J.T. (2012) Additional considerations for gray wolf management after their removal from endangered species act protections. Journal of Wildlife Management & Wildlife Monographs 76: 457461.
Williams, R. (2006) Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. Stata Journal 6: 5882.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Lute supplementary material
Appendix S2

 Word (9.1 MB)
9.1 MB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Lute supplementary material
Appendix S1

 Word (241 KB)
241 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed