Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 73
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Christian, Mikolo Yobo and Kasumi, Ito 2016. Evolution of policies and legal frameworks governing the management of forest and National Parks resources in Gabon. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, p. 41.

    Daniel, Niles and Robin, Roth 2016. Conservation of Traditional Agriculture as Living Knowledge Systems, Not Cultural Relics. Journal of Resources and Ecology, Vol. 7, Issue. 3, p. 231.

    Dudley, N. and Stolton, S. 2016. Protected Areas.

    Gardner, Charlie J. Jasper, Louise D. Eonintsoa, Christian Duchene, Julio-Josepha and Davies, Zoe G. 2016. The impact of natural resource use on bird and reptile communities within multiple-use protected areas: evidence from sub-arid Southern Madagascar. Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 25, Issue. 9, p. 1773.

    Idohou, Rodrigue Assogbadjo, Achille Ephrem Kakaï, Romain Glèlè and Peterson, A. Townsend 2016. Spatio-temporal dynamic of suitable areas for species conservation in West Africa: eight economically important wild palms under present and future climates. Agroforestry Systems,

    Mellon, Vicky and Bramwell, Bill 2016. Protected area policies and sustainable tourism: influences, relationships and co-evolution. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, p. 1.

    Bell, Jonathan and Stockdale, Aileen 2015. Evolving national park models: The emergence of an economic imperative and its effect on the contested nature of the ‘national’ park concept in Northern Ireland. Land Use Policy, Vol. 49, p. 213.

    Blackman, Allen 2015. Strict versus mixed-use protected areas: Guatemala's Maya Biosphere Reserve. Ecological Economics, Vol. 112, p. 14.

    Clarke, Richard 2015. Beyond landscape designation. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 26, Issue. 2, p. 172.

    Françoso, Renata D. Brandão, Reuber Nogueira, Cristiano C. Salmona, Yuri B. Machado, Ricardo Bomfim and Colli, Guarino R. 2015. Habitat loss and the effectiveness of protected areas in the Cerrado Biodiversity Hotspot. Natureza & Conservação, Vol. 13, Issue. 1, p. 35.

    MacKinnon, D. Lemieux, C. J. Beazley, K. Woodley, S. Helie, R. Perron, J. Elliott, J. Haas, C. Langlois, J. Lazaruk, H. Beechey, T. and Gray, P. 2015. Canada and Aichi Biodiversity Target 11: understanding ‘other effective area-based conservation measures’ in the context of the broader target. Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 24, Issue. 14, p. 3559.

    Mzumara, Tiwonge I. Perrin, Mike R. and Downs, Colleen T. 2015. The drinking habits of the Lilian's lovebird and incidents of poisoning at waterholes. African Journal of Ecology, p. n/a.

    Shafer, Craig L. 2015. Cautionary thoughts on IUCN protected area management categories V–VI. Global Ecology and Conservation, Vol. 3, p. 331.

    Solomon, Chanie and Dereje, Tesfaye 2015. Threats of biodiversity conservation and ecotourism activities in Nechsar National Park, Ethiopia. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 7, Issue. 3, p. 130.

    Wiersma, YolandaF Hvenegaard, GlenT Schmiegelow, FionaK. A. Duinker, PeterN and Haider, Wolfgang 2015. Introduction: Relationships Between Protected Areas and Sustainable Forest Management: Where are We Heading?. Conservation and Society, Vol. 13, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Andrew, Margaret E. Wulder, Michael A. and Cardille, Jeffrey A. 2014. Protected areas in boreal Canada: a baseline and considerations for the continued development of a representative and effective reserve network1. Environmental Reviews, Vol. 22, Issue. 2, p. 135.

    Augustine, Skye and Dearden, Philip 2014. Changing paradigms in marine and coastal conservation: A case study of clam gardens in the Southern Gulf Islands, Canada. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe canadien, Vol. 58, Issue. 3, p. 305.

    BARAL, NABIN 2014. Evaluation and resilience of ecotourism in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Environmental Conservation, Vol. 41, Issue. 01, p. 84.

    Dixon, Kelly J. 2014. Historical Archaeologies of the American West. Journal of Archaeological Research, Vol. 22, Issue. 3, p. 177.

    Niedziałkowski, K. Blicharska, M. Mikusiński, G. and Jędrzejewska, B. 2014. Why is it difficult to enlarge a protected area? Ecosystem services perspective on the conflict around the extension of the Białowieża National Park in Poland. Land Use Policy, Vol. 38, p. 314.


Rethinking protected area categories and the new paradigm

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 April 2005

The World Conservation Union (IUCN) plays a global leadership role in defining different types of protected areas, and influencing how protected area systems develop and are managed. Following the 1992 World Parks Congress, a new system of categorizing protected areas was developed. New categories were introduced, including categories that allowed resource extraction. Since that time there has been rapid growth in the global numbers and size of protected areas, with most growth being shown in the new categories. Further-more, the IUCN has heralded a ‘new paradigm’ of protected areas, which became the main focus of the 2003 World Parks Congress. The paradigm focuses on benefits to local people to alleviate poverty, re-engineering protected areas professionals, and an emphasis on the interaction between humans and nature through a focus on the new IUCN protected area categories.The purpose of this paper is to examine critically the implications of the new categories and paradigm shift in light of the main purpose of protected areas, to protect wild biodiversity. Wild biodiversity will not be well served by adoption of this new paradigm, which will devalue conservation biology, undermine the creation of more strictly protected reserves, inflate the amount of area in reserves and place people at the centre of the protected area agenda at the expense of wild biodiversity. Only IUCN categories I–IV should be recognized as protected areas. The new categories, namely culturally modified landscapes (V) and managed resource areas (VI), should be reclassified as sustainable development areas. To do so would better serve both the protection of wild biodiversity and those seeking to meet human needs on humanized landscapes where sustainable development is practised.

Corresponding author
Correspondence: Professor Philip Dearden Tel: +1 250 721 7335 Fax: +1 250 721 6216 e-mail:
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *