Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Role of bioregionalism in Bookmark Biosphere Reserve, Australia

  • SHARRON L. PFUELLER (a1)
Abstract
SUMMARY

Bioregionalism claims that interaction between the biophysical and human components of a region generates place-based environmental and social understanding and concern, which lead to locally shared power and responsibility in cooperative land management and governance. The Man and the Biosphere Programme's Seville Strategy calls for local community participation in a multi-stakeholder ecosystem-based approach to conservation, but it is unclear if tenets of bioregionalism play a role in its implementation. Bookmark Biosphere Reserve (BBR) in Australia has substantially succeeded in scientific research and monitoring, conservation, environmental education and sustainable land-use initiatives. Aspects of bioregionalism (for example recognition of the region's unique identity, local community sense of responsibility, integration of local knowledge, presence of motivated local leaders and cooperative community-based management through a network of groups) have contributed to success. Other crucial factors were funding, technical and scientific information and support from government agencies, leadership from members of state and federal government and from private philanthropic foundations, community capacity-building for sustainable land management and availability of volunteers from outside the region. Nevertheless, conflict arose in relation to governance, originating from the recognized difficulties of reconciling a diversity of allegiances, motivations, management styles and personalities, and resulted in division of BBR into two, one section being managed largely through the private sector and community volunteers, the other (renamed Riverland Biosphere Reserve) coordinated by a committee with more diverse affiliations. Bioregionalism can play a role in biosphere reserves but motivations and resources of external public and private organizations are also vital. Avoiding weaknesses of bioregional approaches requires greater attention to social aspects of environmental management. Governance structures and processes need to be inclusive, flexible and equitable in decision making and access to funds. They should support both agency and community-initiated activities and include conflict resolution mechanisms.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence: Dr Sharron Pfueller Tel: +61 3 9905 4619 Fax: +61 3 9905 2948 e-mail: sharron.pfueller@arts.monash.edu.au
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D. Alexander (1990) Bioregionalism: science or sensibility? Environmental Ethics 12: 161174.

J.M. Anderies , M.A. Janssen & E. Ostrom (2004) A framework to analyse the robustness of socio-ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecology and Society 9: 1834.

M. Batisse (1982) The Biosphere Reserve: a tool for environmental conservation and management. Environmental Conservation 9: 101113.

D. Berthold-Bond (2000) The ethics of ‘place’: reflections on bioregionalism. Environmental Ethics 22: 524.

R.F. Dasmann (1972 b) Towards a system for classifying natural regions of the world and their representation by National Parks and reserves. Biological Conservation 4: 247255.

R.F. Dasmann (1988) Biosphere reserves, buffers and boundaries. Bioscience 38: 487489.

M. Diffenderfer & D. Birch (1997) Bioregionalism: a comparative study of the Adirondacks and the Sierra Nevada. Society and Natural Resources 10: 316.

S. Frenkel (1994) Old theories in new places: environmental determinism and bioregionalism. Professional Geographer 46: 289295.

R.E. Grumbine (1994) What is ecosystem management? Conservation Biology 8: 2738.

A.K. Krishna , S. Chhetri & K.K. Singh (2002) Human dimensions of conservation in the Khangchendzonga Biosphere Reserve. Mountain Research and Development 22: 328331.

N. Kumar , L.W. Stern & J.C. Anderson (1993) Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. The Academy of Management Journal 36: 16331651.

W.D. Leach & N.W. Pelkey (2001) Making watershed partnerships work: a review of the empirical literature. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 127: 378385.

Y.H. , L.D. Chen , B.J. Fu & S.L. Liu (2003) A framework for evaluating the effectiveness of protected areas: the case of Wolong Biosphere Reserve. Landscape and Urban Planning 63: 213223.

R.K. Maikhuri , S. Nautiyal , K. Rao & K.G. Saxena (2001) Conservation policy-people conflicts: a case study from Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve (a World Heritage Site), India. Forest Policy and Economics 2: 355365.

R.K. Maikhuri , S. Nautiyal , K.S. Rao , K. Chandrasekhar , R. Gavali & K.G. Saxena (2000) Analysis and resolution of protected area-people conflicts in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India. Environmental Conservation 27: 4353.

K.A. Matysek , E. Stratford & L.E. Kriwowken (2006) The UNESCO Biosphere Reserve Program in Australia: constraints and opportunities for localised sustainable development. The Canadian Geographer 50: 85100.

W.D. McTaggart (1993) Bioregionalism and regional geography: place, people, and networks. Canadian Geographer-Geographe Canadien 37: 307319.

R.F. Noss (1983) A regional landscape approach to maintain diversity. Bioscience 33: 700706.

E. Ostrom (1990) Governing the Commons: the Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

J.J. Parsons (1985) On ‘bioregionalism’ and ‘watershed consciousness’. Professional Geographer 37: 16.

M.F. Price (1996) People in biosphere reserves: an evolving concept. Society and Natural Resources 9: 645654.

M. Richards (1996) Protected areas, people and incentives in the search for sustainable forest conservation in Honduras. Environmental Conservation 23: 207217.

D.S. Slocombe (1993 a) Environmental planning, ecosystem science and ecosystem approaches for integrating environment and development. Environmental Management 17: 2889–303.

D.S. Slocombe (1993 b) Implementing ecosystem-based management. Bioscience 43: 612622.

J. Sundberg (2003) Conservation and democratization: constituting citizenship in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala. Political Geography 22: 715740.

B. Taylor (2000 a) Bioregionalism: an ethics of loyalty to place. Landscape Journal 19: 5072.

A van Newkirk . (1975) Bioregions: towards bioregional strategy for human cultures. Environmental Conservation 2: 108119.

S.L. Yaffee (1996) Ecosystem management in practice: the importance of human institutions. Ecological Applications 6: 724727.

S.L. Yaffee (1999) Three faces of ecosystem management. Conservation Biology 13: 713725.

E. Young (1999) Local people and conservaton in Mexico's El Vizcaino Biosphere Reserve. The Geographical Review 89: 364392.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 25 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 61 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.