Skip to main content
×
×
Home

What does community participation in nature protection mean? The case of tropical national parks in Africa

  • RUPPERT VIMAL (a1) (a2), MAUDE KHALIL-LORTIE (a1) (a3) and TSEGAYE GATISO (a1) (a3)
Summary

In spite of significant investment, community-based conservation often suffers from a lack of appropriate design. In this study, drawing on 86 interviews around six national parks in tropical Africa, we analyse the perceptions of different stakeholders (e.g. governmental officials, non-governmental organization staff and researchers) regarding community participation. Our results mainly reveal the absence of a clear and shared definition of community participation. While 67% of the participants defined community participation as a community's support of nature protection (low empowerment) and/or as its participation in conservation implementation (medium empowerment), 28% mentioned that the community should also participate in decision-making (high empowerment). Our study shows that participants with no university degree, belonging to governmental organizations and/or employed as workers tend to propose a lower level of empowerment, while those educated to a postgraduate level, belonging to research institutes and/or employed as researchers propose higher degrees of empowerment. Our study mainly suggests that the different degrees of empowerment proposed by the stakeholders depend on their relation to the space of conservation and their daily connection to practical management as drivers of the inclusion or exclusion of local communities in conservation decision-making. To properly design and implement community-based conservation, conservation actors above all must share a common definition of the concept.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence: Dr Ruppert Vimal email: ruppert.vimal@idiv.de
Footnotes
Hide All

Supplementary material can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892917000583

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Adams, W. M. & Hulme, D. (2001) If community conservation is the answer in Africa, what is the question? Oryx 35: 193200.
Adams, W. M. & Hutton, J. (2007) People, parks and poverty: Political ecology and biodiversity conservation. Conservation and Society 5: 147.
Andrade, G. S. & Rhodes, J. R. (2012) Protected areas and local communities: An inevitable partnership toward successful conservation strategies? Ecology and Society 17: 14.
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J. & Bates, D. M. (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59: 390412.
Berkes, F. (2004) Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology 18: 621630.
Berkes, F. (2007) Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 1518815193.
Brockington, D. & Scholfield, K. (2010) Expenditure by conservation nongovernmental organizations in sub-Saharan Africa. Conservation Letters 3: 106113.
Brooks, J., Waylen, K. A. & Mulder, M. B. (2013) Assessing community-based conservation projects: A systematic review and multilevel analysis of attitudinal, behavioral, ecological, and economic outcomes. Environmental Evidence 2: 2.
Butchart, S. H. M., Walpole, M., Collen, B., Strien, A. van Scharlemann, J. P. W., Almond, R. E. A. et al. (2010) Global biodiversity: Indicators of recent declines. Science 328: 11641168.
Campbell, L. M. (2005) Overcoming obstacles to interdisciplinary research. Conservation Biology 19: 574577.
Campbell, L. M. & Vainio-Mattila, A. (2003) Participatory development and community-based conservation: Opportunities missed for lessons learned? Human Ecology 31: 417437.
Chape, S., Spalding, M. & Jenkins, M. (2008) The World's Protected Areas: Status, Values and Prospects in the 21st Century. Castilla-La Mancha, Spain: University of Castilla-La Mancha.
Child, B. (2013) Parks in Transition: ‘Biodiversity, Rural Development and the Bottom Line. London, UK: Routledge.
Cleaver, F. (1999) Paradoxes of participation: Questioning participatory approaches to development. Journal of International Development 11: 597612.
Craigie, I. D., Baillie, J. E. M., Balmford, A., Carbone, C., Collen, B., Green, R. E. & Hutton, J. M. (2010) Large mammal population declines in Africa's protected areas. Biological Conservation 143: 22212228.
Dressler, W., Büscher, B., Schoon, M., Brockington, D., Hayes, T., Kull, C. A., McCarthy, J. & Shrestha, K. (2010) From hope to crisis and back again? A critical history of the global CBNRM narrative. Environmental Conservation 37: 515.
Feindt, P. H. & Oels, A. (2005) Does discourse matter? Discourse analysis in environmental policy making. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 7: 161173.
Gatiso, T. T., Vollan, B., Vimal, R. & Kühl, H. S. (2017) If possible, incentivize individuals not groups: Evidence from lab-in-the-field experiments on forest conservation in rural Uganda. Conservation Letters, epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12387.
Goldman, M. (2003) Partitioned nature, privileged knowledge: Community-based conservation in Tanzania. Development and Change 34: 833862.
Hajer, M. & Versteeg, W. (2005) A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 7: 175184.
Horwich, R. H. & Lyon, J. (2007) Community conservation: Practitioners’ answer to critics. Oryx 41: 376385.
Hulme, D. & Murphree, M. (1999) Communities, wildlife and the ‘new conservation’ in Africa. Journal of International Development 11: 277285.
Junker, J., Blake, S., Boesch, C., Campbell, G., Toit, L. du Duvall, C. et al. (2012) Recent decline in suitable environmental conditions for African great apes. Diversity and Distributions 18: 10771091.
Kellert, S., Mehta, J. & Lichtenfeld, L. (2000) Community natural resource management: Promise, rhetoric, and reality. Society and Natural Resources 13: 735745.
Kumar, C. (2005) Revisiting ‘community’ in community-based natural resource management. Community Development Journal 40: 275285.
Larson, L. R., Conway, A. L., Krafte, K. E., Hernandez, S. M. & Carroll, J. P. (2016) Community-based conservation as a potential source of conflict around a protected area in Sierra Leone. Environmental Conservation 43: 242252.
Mace, G. M. (2014) Whose conservation? Science 345: 15581560.
McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J. A. (1989) Generalized Linear Models, Second Edition. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.
Mutanga, C. N., Muboko, N. & Gandiwa, E. (2017) Protected area staff and local community viewpoints: A qualitative assessment of conservation relationships in Zimbabwe. PLoS ONE 12: e0177153.
Noe, C. & Kangalawe, R. Y. M. (2015) Wildlife protection, community participation in conservation, and (dis) empowerment in southern Tanzania. Conservation and Society 13: 244.
Pimbert, M. P. & Pretty, J. N. (1997) Parks, people and professionals: Putting ‘participation´ into protected-area management. In: Social Change and Conservation. Environmental Politics and Impacts of National Parks and Protected Areas, eds. Ghimire, K. B. & Pimbert, M. P., pp. 297330. London, UK: Earthscan Publications Limited.
Core Team, R (2014) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Rasolofoson, R. A., Ferraro, P. J., Jenkins, C. N. & Jones, J. P. G. (2015) Effectiveness of community forest management at reducing deforestation in Madagascar. Biological Conservation 184: 271277.
Reed, M. S. (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation 141: 24172431.
Roe, D., Nelson, F. & Sandbrook, C. (2009) Community management of natural resources in Africa: Impacts, experiences and future directions. IIED. [www document]. URL http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/17503IIED.pdf
Ruiz-Mallén, I., Schunko, C., Corbera, E., Rös, M. & Reyes-García, V. (2015) Meanings, drivers, and motivations for community-based conservation in Latin America. Ecology and Society 20: 33.
Sanderson, E. W., Malanding, J., Levy, M. A., Redford, K. H., Wannebo, A. V. & Woolmer, G. (2002) The human footprint and the last of the wild. BioScience 52: 891904.
Saout, S. L., Hoffmann, M., Shi, Y., Hughes, A., Bernard, C., Brooks, T. M., Bertzky, B., Butchart, S. H. M., Stuart, S. N., Badman, T. & Rodrigues, A. S. L. (2013) Protected areas and effective biodiversity conservation. Science 342: 803805.
Spiteri, A. & Nepalz, S. K. (2006) Incentive-based conservation programs in developing countries: A review of some key issues and suggestions for improvements. Environmental Management 37: 114.
Tole, L. (2010) Reforms from the ground up: A review of community-based forest management in tropical developing countries. Environmental Management 45: 13121331.
Tranquilli, S., Abedi-Lartey, M., Abernethy, K., Amsini, F., Asamoah, A., Balangtaa, C. et al. (2014) Protected areas in tropical Africa: Assessing threats and conservation activities. PLoS ONE 9: e114154.
Vimal, R. (2017) Monitoring for conservation in African tropical national parks: An agenda towards policy-relevant science. Biological Conservation 214: 127135.
Vimal, R. & Mathevet, R. (2011) La carte et le territoire: Le réseau écologique à l’épreuve de l'assemblée cartographique. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography [www document]. URL https://cybergeo.revues.org/24841
Vimal, R., Mathevet, R. & Michel, L. (2013) Entre expertises et jeux d'acteurs: La trame verte et bleue du Grenelle de l'environnement. Natures Sciences Sociétés 20: 415424.
Watson, J. E. M., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B. & Hockings, M. (2014) The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature 515: 6773.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Vimal et al. supplementary material
Vimal et al. supplementary material 2

 Unknown (11 KB)
11 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Vimal et al. supplementary material
Vimal et al. supplementary material 1

 Word (23 KB)
23 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 59 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 355 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 18th January 2018 - 20th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.