Skip to main content Accessibility help

Wildlife Insights: A Platform to Maximize the Potential of Camera Trap and Other Passive Sensor Wildlife Data for the Planet

  • Jorge A Ahumada (a1) (a2), Eric Fegraus (a3), Tanya Birch (a4), Nicole Flores (a1), Roland Kays (a5), Timothy G O’Brien (a6), Jonathan Palmer (a6), Stephanie Schuttler (a5), Jennifer Y Zhao (a7), Walter Jetz (a8), Margaret Kinnaird (a9), Sayali Kulkarni (a4), Arnaud Lyet (a10), David Thau (a10), Michelle Duong (a8), Ruth Oliver (a8) and Anthony Dancer (a11)...


Wildlife is an essential component of all ecosystems. Most places in the globe do not have local, timely information on which species are present or how their populations are changing. With the arrival of new technologies, camera traps have become a popular way to collect wildlife data. However, data collection has increased at a much faster rate than the development of tools to manage, process and analyse these data. Without these tools, wildlife managers and other stakeholders have little information to effectively manage, understand and monitor wildlife populations. We identify four barriers that are hindering the widespread use of camera trap data for conservation. We propose specific solutions to remove these barriers integrated in a modern technology platform called Wildlife Insights. We present an architecture for this platform and describe its main components. We recognize and discuss the potential risks of publishing shared biodiversity data and a framework to mitigate those risks. Finally, we discuss a strategy to ensure platforms like Wildlife Insights are sustainable and have an enduring impact on the conservation of wildlife.


Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Dr Jorge A Ahumada, Email:


Hide All
Ahumada, JA, O’Brien, TG, Mugerwa, B, Hurtado, J (2016) Camera trapping as a monitoring tool at national and global levels. In: Camera Trapping for Wildlife Research , eds. Rovero, F, Zimmermann, F, pp. 196218. Exeter, UK: Pelagic Publishing Ltd.
Dirzo, R, Young, HS, Galetti, M, Ceballos, G, Isaac, NJ, Collen, B (2014) Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science 345(6195): 401406.
Farley, SS, Dawson, A, Goring, SJ, Williams, JW (2018) Situating ecology as a big-data science: current advances, challenges, and solutions. Bioscience 68(8): 563576.
Fegraus, EH, Lin, K, Ahumada, JA, Baru, C, Chandra, S, Youn, C (2011) Data acquisition and management software for camera trap data: a case study from the TEAM Network. Ecological Informatics 6: 345353.
Glover-Kapfer, P, Soto-Navarro, CA, Wearn, OR (2019) Camera-trapping version 3.0: current constraints and future priorities for development. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. DOI: 10.1002/rse2.106. Epub ahead of print.
Griscom, BW, Adams, J, Ellis, PW, Houghton, RA, Lomax, G, Miteva, DA et al. (2017) Natural climate solutions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114(44): 1164511650.
Harris, G, Thompson, R, Childs, JL, Sanderson, JG (2010) Automatic storage and analysis of camera trap data. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 91(3): 352360.
Harrison, RD, Tan, S, Plotkin, JB, Slik, F, Detto, M, Brenes, T et al. (2013) Consequences of defaunation for a tropical tree community. Ecology Letters 16(5): 687694.
IUCN , World Commission on Protected Areas (2017) IUCN Green List of Protected and Conserved Areas: Standard, Version 1.1 . Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
Jetz, W, McGeoch, MA, Guralnick, R, Ferrier, S, Beck, J, Costello, MJ et al. (2019) Essential biodiversity variables for mapping and monitoring species populations. Nature Ecology & Evolution 3: 539551.
Jetz, W, McPherson, JM, Guralnick, RP (2012) Integrating biodiversity distribution knowledge: toward a global map of life. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27: 151159.
Kissling, WD, Ahumada, JA, Bowser, A, Fernandez, M, Fernández, N, García, EA et al. (2018) Building essential biodiversity variables (EBVs) of species distribution and abundance at a global scale. Biological Reviews 93(1): 600625.
Kurten, EL (2013) Cascading effects of contemporaneous defaunation on tropical forest communities. Biological Conservation 163: 2232.
McShea, WJ, Forrester, T, Costello, R, He, Z, Kays, R (2016) Volunteer-run cameras as distributed sensors for macrosystem mammal research. Landscape Ecology 31(1): 5566.
Meyer, C, Kreft, H, Guralnick, R, Jetz, W (2015) Global priorities for an effective information basis of biodiversity distributions. Nature Communications 6: 8221.
Michener, WK, Jones, MB (2012) Ecoinformatics: supporting ecology as a data-intensive science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27(2): 8593.
O’Brien, TG, Baillie, JEM, Krueger, L, Cuke, M (2010) The Wildlife Picture Index: monitoring top trophic levels. Animal Conservation 13(4): 335343.
O’Brien, TG, Kinnaird, MF (2013) The Wildlife Picture Index: a biodiversity indicator for top trophic levels. In: Biodiversity Monitoring and Conservation , pp. 4570. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Osuri, AM, Ratnam, J, Varma, V, Alvarez-Loayza, P, Hurtado Astaiza, J, Bradford, M et al. (2016) Contrasting effects of defaunation on aboveground carbon storage across the global tropics. Nature Communications 7: 11351.
Pereira, HM, Ferrier, S, Walters, M, Geller, GN, Jongman, RHG, Scholes, RJ, Bruford, MW et al. (2013) Essential biodiversity variables. Science 339(6117): 277278.
Peres, CA, Emilio, T, Schietti, J, Desmoulière, SJ, Levi, T (2016) Dispersal limitation induces long-term biomass collapse in overhunted Amazonian forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113(4): 892897.
Ripple, WJ, Chapron, G, López-Bao, JV, Durant, SM, Macdonald, DW, Lindsey, PA et al. (2016) Saving the world’s terrestrial megafauna. Bioscience 66(10): 807812.
Schuttler, SG, Sears, RS, Orendain, I, Khot, R, Rubenstein, D, Rubenstein, N et al. (2019) Citizen science in schools: students collect valuable mammal data for science, conservation, and community engagement. Bioscience 69(1): 6979.
Scotson, L, Johnston, LR, Iannarilli, F, Wearn, OR, Mohd-Azlan, J, Wong, W et al. (2017) Best practices and software for the management and sharing of camera trap data for small and large scales studies. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 3: 158172.
Steenweg, R, Hebblewhite, M, Kays, R, Ahumada, J, Fisher, JT, Burton, C et al. (2017) Scaling-up camera traps: monitoring the planet’s biodiversity with networks of remote sensors. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 15(1): 2634.
Stephenson, PJ, Brooks, TM, Butchart, SHM, Fegraus, E, Geller, GN, Hoft, R et al. (2017) Priorities for big biodiversity data. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 15(3): 124125.
Szegedy, C, Vanhoucke, V, Ioffe, S, Shlens, J, Wojna, Z (2016). Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision [www document]. URL
TEAM Network (2011) Terrestrial Vertebrate Monitoring Protocol. v 3.1. TEAM Standardized Monitoring Protocols [www document]. URL
Tulloch, AIT, Auerbach, N, Avery-Gomm, S, Bayraktarov, E, Butt, N, Dickman, CR et al. (2018) A decision tree for assessing the risks and benefits of publishing biodiversity data. Nature Ecology & Evolution 2(8): 12091217.
Wearn, O, Glover-Kapfer, P (2017) Camera-Trapping for Conservation: A Guide to Best-Practices . Woking, UK: WWF-UK.



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed