Skip to main content

Commentary: Delisting and Redeveloping Brownfields in Texas: A Question of Effectiveness

  • Stephanie Garcia (a1) and Craig E. Colten (a2)

In spring 1995, the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) announced plans to “delist” over 24,000 sites from its inventory of potential Superfund sites known as CERCLIS (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System). The Clinton Administration hoped that by taking sites that had a very low probability of harboring severe contamination off the federal inventory, they could lift the cloud of environmental uncertainty; and with a gentle federal boost, laissez-faire development would improve conditions in the neediest neighborhoods. Through a review of the delisted sites available via Land View III, local records on brownfield properties, interviews with brownfields coordinators, and Texas Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) inventories, we tabulated the number of delisted sites that were included in the two redevelopment efforts in Texas—the federal brownfields program and state VCP. The most obvious element of this tabulation is the small correspondence between delisted sites and brownfield or VCP efforts. While there is legitimate reason to claim success for the brownfield and voluntary cleanup programs for stimulating redevelopment, they have had little impact on the delisted sites. A national assessment of the process might point to states where there is greater congruence and identify the steps necessary to create greater overlap nationwide.

Corresponding author
Department of Geography, Southwest Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX 78666; (e-mail)
Hide All
Abrams R. H. 1997. Superfund and the Evolution of Brownfields. William & Mary Environmental Law & Policy Review 21(1):265292.
Avinger M., Brownfields Manager, City of Dallas Economic Development Office. 2000. Telephone interview by author, 20 June, San Marcos.
Black T. 1995. Brownfields Cleanup. Urban Land 54(6):4751.
Bruder R. B. 1999. New Realities Surround Brownfield Investments. National Real Estate Investor 41(8):112.
Chalmers J. A., and Jackson T. O.. 1996. Risk Factors in the Appraisal of Contaminated Property. The Appraisal Journal LXTV (1):4458.
Cleveland Plain Dealer. 1995. Superfund to “De-list” Sites to Spur Urban Development, 26 01.
Columbus Dispatch. 1999. Jury Out on Brownfields, 3 05.
Guerrero S., Rio Grande Council of Governments. 2000. Telephone interview by author, 24 02, San Marcos.
Hansen K., Regulatory Environmental Coordinator, City of Fort Worth Department of Environmental Management. 2000. Telephone interview by author, 24 02, San Marcos.
Jaconetty T. A. 1999. Revitalizing Urban Brownfields—A National, State, and Local Effort to Reclaim Blighted Properties. Assessment Journal 6(4):5667.
Jay J. Senior Planner, San Antonio Neighborhood Commercial Revitalization Program, Neighborhood Action Department. 2000. Telephone interview by author, 29 02, San Marcos.
New York Times. 1995. EPA Helping Cities to Revive Industrial Sites, 4 12.
Nixon-Mendez N., Historic Preservation Officer, City of Laredo Department of Planning. 2000. Telephone interview by author, 24 02, San Marcos.
Ramchandani M. S. 1999. Brownfields Revisited. Urban Land 58(10):1214.
Roddewig R. J. 1997. Using the Cost of Environmental Insurance to Measure Contaminated Property Stigma. The Appraisal Journal LXV(3): 304308.
St. Louis Post-Dispatch. 1995. EPA to Reduce Superfund List by 25,000 Sites to Help Cities, 26 01.
Simons R. A., and Iannone D.. 1997. Brownfields: Supply and Demand. Urban Land 56(6):3638, 78.
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. 1997. Introducing the Voluntary Cleanup Program. Texas VCP News 1:1.
Turner W., Vice President, KMA Environmental [Galveston]. 2000. Telephone interview by author, 22 06, San Marcos.
US Environmental Protection Agency. 1999. The Brownfields Action Agenda, 23 03.
Washington Post. 1995. EPA to Cut Sites from Superfund: Properties Cleared of Waste Are Open to Development, 4 02.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Practice
  • ISSN: 1466-0466
  • EISSN: 1466-0474
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-practice
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 3 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 23 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.