Skip to main content
×
Home

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS AND CASE STUDIES: Changing Norms by Changing Behavior: The Princeton Drink Local Program

  • Jessica M. Santos (a1) and Sander van der Linden (a2)
Abstract

Unprecedented levels of global bottled water consumption present a major challenge for the environment and water conservation initiatives. Educational institutions are in a unique position to promote conservation behavior by signaling pro-environmental norms. To decrease disposable bottled water consumption on campus, Princeton University instituted an innovative “Drink Local” program in 2009. The program provides reusable water bottles to all incoming students and we analyze the program’s impact here by drawing on behavioral and social influence research. In particular, we hypothesized that by signaling that the desired “prototypical” behavior of Princeton students should be “sustainable,” students would be less likely to consume bottled water on one hand, and more likely to offer normative support for a campus bottled water ban on the other. Results from a quasi-experiment involving over 1,300 students confirm our hypotheses; students who received the reusable Drink Local bottles upon arrival to Princeton are significantly less likely to drink disposable bottled water and more likely to support a campus-wide bottled water ban. These results are promising for educational institutions who wish to promote water conservation behavior on campus and beyond.

Environmental Practice 18: 116–122 (2016)

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address correspondence to: Sander van der Linden, Department of Psychology, 421 Peretsman-Scully Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544; (phone) 609-258-6935; (e-mail) sander.vanderlinden@princeton.edu.
References
Hide All
Anadu E.C., and Harding A.. 2000. Risk Perception and Bottled Water Use. Journal of the American Water Works Association 92:8292.
Azoulay A., Garzon P., and Eisenberg M.J.. 2001. Comparison of the Mineral Content of Tap Water and Bottled Waters. Journal of General Internal Medicine 16(3):168175.
Ban the Bottle. 2015. Available at https://www.banthebottle.net/.
Beverage Marketing Corporation. 2014. Press Release: Bottled Water Continues Growing, New Report From Beverage Marketing Corporation Shows. Available at http://www.beveragemarketing.com/news-detail.asp?id=340.
Cialdini R.B., Kallgren C.A., and Reno R.. 1991. A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct. Advances in Experimental Psychology 24:201234.
Copes R., Evans G.M., and Verhille S.. 2009. Bottled vs Tap Water. BC Medical Journal 51(3):112113.
Doria M.F. 2006. Bottled Water versus Tap Water: Understanding Consumers’ Preferences. Journal for Water and Health 4:271276.
Doria M.F., Pidgeon N., and Hunter P.. 2005. Perception of Tap Water Risks and Quality: A Structural Equation Model Approach. Water Science & Technology 52:143149.
Food and Agriculture Organization. 2013. Drought Facts. Available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/017/aq191e/aq191e.pdf.
Gallup. 2015. In U.S., Concern about Environmental Threats Eases. Available at http://www.gallup.com/poll/182105/concern-environmental-threats-eases.aspx.
Gleick P.H., and Cooley H.S.. 2009. Energy Implications of Bottled Water. Environmental Research Letters 4:16.
Goldstein N.J., Cialdini R.B., and Griskevicius V.. 2008. A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels. Journal of Consumer Research 35(3):472482.
Gorelick M.H., Gould L., Nimmer M., Wagner D., Heath M., Gashir H., and Brousseau D.C.. 2011. Perceptions about Water and Increased Use of Bottled Water in Minority Children. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 165:928932.
Government Accountability Office. 2009. Bottled Water: FDA Safety and Consumer Protections Are Often Less Stringent than Comparable EPA Protections for Tap Water. United States Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09861t.pdf.
Hu Z., Morton L., and Mahler R.. 2011. Bottled Water: United States Consumers and Their Perceptions of Water Quality. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 8:565578.
Kollmuss A., and Agyeman J.. 2002. Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers to Pro-environmental Behaviour? Environmental Education Research 8:239260.
Kormos C., and Gifford R.. 2014. The Validity of Self-Report Measures of Pro-environmental Behavior: A Meta-analytic Review. Journal of Environmental Psychology 40:359371.
Mann M.E., and Gleick P.H.. 2015. Climate Change and California Drought in the 21st Century. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(13):38583859.
McKenzie-Mohr D. 2000. Fostering Sustainable Behavior through Community-based Social Marketing. American Psychologist 55(5):531537.
Mildenberger M., Stokes L., Savan B., Kolenda B., and Dolderman D.. 2013. Beyond the Information Campaign: Community-Based Energy Behavioral Change at the University of Toronto. Environmental Practice 15(2):147155.
Miller D.T., and Prentice D.A.. 2016. Changing norms to change behavior. Annual Review of Psychology 67:339361.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2016. Great Pacific Garbage Patch. The U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. Available at http://marinedebris.noaa.gov/info/patch.html.
National Association for PET Container Resources. 2013. Report on Postconsumer PET Container Recycling Activity in 2012. NAPCOR, Sonoma, CA, 13 pp.
O’Donnell C., and Rice R.E.. 2012. A Communication Approach to Campus Bottled Water Campaigns. Social Marketing Quarterly 18(4):255273.
Osbaldiston R., and Schott J.. 2012. Environmental Sustainability and Behavioral Science: Meta-analysis of Pro-Environmental Behavior. Environment and Behavior 44:257299.
Pacific Institute. 2007. Bottled Water and Energy Fact Sheet. The Pacific Institute, Oakland, CA. Available at http://pacinst.org/publication/bottled-water-and-energy-a-fact-sheet/.
Raj S.D. 2005. Bottled Water: How Safe Is It? Water Environment Research 77(7):30133018.
Russell S., and Fielding K.. 2010. Water Demand Management Research: A Psychological Perspective. Water Resources Research 46(5):W05302.
Saylor A., Propoky L., and Amberg S.. 2011. What’s Wrong with the Tap? Examining Perceptions of Tap Water and Bottled Water at Purdue University. Environmental Management 48:588601.
Syme G.J., Nancarrow B.E., and Seligman C.. 2000. The Evaluation of Information Campaigns to Promote Voluntary Household Water Conservation. Evaluation Review 24:539578.
Tankard M.E., and Paluck E.L.. 2016. Norm Perception As a Vehicle for Social Change. Social Issues and Policy Review 10(1):181211.
Thaler R.H., and Sunstein C.R.. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 293 pp.
Tversky A., and Kahneman D.. 1974. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science 185:11241131.
van der Linden S. 2013. Exploring Beliefs about Bottled Water and Intentions to Reduce Consumption: The Dual-effect of Social Norm Activation and Persuasive Information. Environment and Behavior 47(5):526550.
van der Linden S. 2014. Towards a New Model for Communicating Climate Change. In. Understanding and Governing Sustainable Tourism Mobility: Psychological and Behavioural Approaches, S. Cohen, J. Higham, P. Peeters and S. Gössling, Eds. Routledge, 243275.
van der Linden S. 2015. Intrinsic Motivation and Pro-environmental Behaviour. Nature Climate Change 5(7):612613.
World Health Organization. 2014. UN-Water Global Analysis and Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water (GLAAS). Available at http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/glaas_report_2014/en/.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Practice
  • ISSN: 1466-0466
  • EISSN: 1466-0474
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-practice
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 14
Total number of PDF views: 92 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 536 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.