Skip to main content
×
×
Home

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS AND CASE STUDIES: Public Perception, Knowledge, and Participation in Climate Change Adaptation Governance in the Coastal Region of Bangladesh Using the Social Ecological Inventory (SEI) Tool

  • Khalid Md. Bahauddin (a1), Nasibul Rahman (a2) and MD Tanvir Hasnine (a3)
Abstract

Public participation is commonly advocated for as part of policy responses to climate change. This study examines the prospects for inclusive approaches to climate change adaptation, drawing particularly on studies of long-term climate change adaptation in a coastal region in Bangladesh. It has been suggested that public perception, knowledge, and participation are important goals in the process of formulating response to climate change risks. This study found that local people as well as other stakeholders who participated in the study were more or less familiar with the term “climate change.” However, the participants’ understanding of what the term means and climate change’s causes varied widely. The results also showed that a large number of the participants were uncertain about the solution to the climate change problems they are already experiencing, due to lack of accessible information from different governmental and non-governmental sources. It is notable that, despite being a country with a high level of political commitment to dealing with climate change, supported by plans, programs, and interventions, the people of Bangladesh are largely unaware of these efforts. This study explores the Social Ecological Inventory (SEI) tool as a means of managing the governance system for climate change adaptation in order to explore the public’s perception of, knowledge about, and participation in developing adaptation plans. In this study, we used the SEI tool to systemically map the values, motives, activities, knowledge, and experiences of different actors over time and in different networks in order to prepare the ground for participation in developing climate change adaptation plans by helping identify and select the most appropriate set of actors to work with; build trust between these different actors; and, finally, reach a consensus among actors on how to enhance a region’s sustainability and resilience.

Environmental Practice 18: 32–43 (2016)

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Address correspondence to: Nasibul Rahman; (e-mail) rahman.nasibul@gmail.com.
References
Hide All
Agrawala, S., Ota, T., Ahmed, A.U., Smith, J., and van Aalst, M.. 2003. Development and Climate Change in Bangladesh: Focus on Coastal Flooding and the Sunderbans. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris, France, 1316.
Ahmad, Q.K., and Ahmed, A.U.. 2003. Regional Cooperation in Flood Management in the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna Region: Bangladesh Perspectives. Natural Hazards 28:191198.
Ahmed, A.U., and Haque, N.. 2002. Climate Change and Sustainable Development. Paper presented at the Dhaka Meet on Sustainable Development, March 14–18. Incorporated in Citizens’ Perspectives on Sustainable Development, Q.K. Ahmad and A.U. Ahmed, eds. Bangladesh Unnayan Parishad (BUP), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 19–21.
Arnstein, S.R. 1969. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 35(4):216224.
Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Dale, A., Kocho-Schellenberg, E., and Patton, E. 2011. Co-management and the Co-production of Knowledge: Learning to Adapt in Canada’s Arctic. Global Environmental Change 21(3):9951004.
Baird, J., Plummer, R., and Pickering, K.. 2014. Priming the Governance System for Climate Change Adaptation: The Application of a Social-Ecological Inventory to Engage Actors in Niagara, Canada. Ecology and Society 19(1):3.
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS). 1999. Census of Agriculture 1996. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 13. Available at http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/ess/documents/world_census_of_agriculture/main_results_by_country/bangla_2000.pdf.
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS). 2006. Statistical Pocketbook of Bangladesh: 2004. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh (GOB), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 5559.
Bloomfield, D., Collins, K., Fry, C., and Munton, R.. 2001. Deliberation and Inclusion: Vehicles for Increasing Trust in UK Public Governance? Environment and Planning C 19(4):501513.
Brunner, R., and Lynch, A.. 2010. Adaptive Governance and Climate Change. American Meteorological Society, Boston, Massachusetts. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-935704-01-0.
Collins, K., and Ison, R.. 2009. Jumping off Arnstein’s Ladder: Social Learning as a New Policy Paradigm for Climate Change Adaptation. Environmental Policy and Governance 19:358373. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eet.523.
Davos, C.A., and Lajano, R.P.. 2001. Analytical Perspectives of Cooperative Coastal Management. Journal of Environmental Management 62:123130. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jema.2001.0427.
Diduck, A. 2010. The Learning Dimension of Adaptive Capacity: Untangling the Multi-level Connections. In Adaptive Capacity and Environmental Governance, D. Armitage, and R. Plummer, eds. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 199223.
Engle, N.L. 2011. Adaptive Capacity and Its Assessment. Global Environmental Change 21(2):647656. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.019.
Environment Agency (EA). 2012. Managing Flood Risk Through London and the Thames Estuary. TE2100 Plan, Thames Estuary 2100. Environment Agency, Charlton, London, UK. Available at http://a0768b4a8a31e106d8b050dc802554eb38a24458b98ff72d550b.r19.cf3.rackcdn.com/LIT7540_43858f.pdf.
Evans, J.P. 2012. Environmental Governance. Routledge, New York, New York, 272 pp.
Fankhauser, S., Smith, J.B., and Tol, R.S.J.. 1997. Weathering Climate Change: Some Simple Rules to Guide Adaptation Decisions. Ecological Economics 30:6778. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00117-7.
Few, R., Brown, K., and Tompkins, E.M.. 2007. Public Participation and Climate Change Adaptation: Avoiding the Illusion of Inclusion. Climate Policy 7:4659. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2007.0704.
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., and Norberg, J.. 2005. Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30:441473. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511.
Füssel, H.M. 2007. Adaptation Planning for Climate Change: Concepts, Assessment Approaches, and Key Lessons. Sustainability Science 2:265275. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11625-007-0032y.
Füssel, H.M., and Klein, R.J.T.. 2006. Climate Change Vulnerability Assessments: An Evolution of Conceptual Thinking. Climatic Change 75(3):301329. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-0329-3.
Gallopín, G.C. 2006. Linkages Between Vulnerability, Resilience, and Adaptive Capacity. Global Environmental Change 16(3):293303.
Gunderson, L., and Light, S.S.. 2006. Adaptive Management and Adaptive Governance in the Everglades Ecosystem. Policy Sciences 39:323334.
Huitema, D., Mostert, E., Egas, W., Moellenkamp, S., Pahl-Wostl, C., and Yalcin, R.. 2009. Adaptive Water Governance: Assessing the Institutional Prescriptions of Adaptive (Co-) Management from a Governance Perspective and Defining a Research Agenda. Ecology and Society 14(1):26.
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC). 2001. World Disaster Report 2001. Focus on Recovery. Kumarian, Bloomfield, CT, 2731.
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC). 2004. World Disasters Report: Focus on Community Resilience. IFRC, Geneva, Switzerland. Available at http://www.ifrc.org/PageFiles/89755/WDR2004/58000-WDR2004-LR.pdf.
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). 2003. Livelihoods and Climate Change: Combining Disaster Risk Reduction, Natural Resource Management and Climate Change Adaptation in a New Approach to the Reduction of Vulnerability and Poverty. IISD, Winnipeg, Canada. Available at http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2003/natres_livelihoods_cc.pdf.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2001. Climate Change 2001: Mitigation, Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2329.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Climate Change 2007. Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Available at http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg2/en/contents.html.
Lebel, L., Anderies, J.M., Campbell, B., Folke, C., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Hughes, T.P., and Wilson, J.. 2006. Governance and the Capacity to Manage Resilience in Regional Social-Ecological Systems. Ecology and Society 11(1):19.
Lee, K.N. 1993. Compass and Gyroscope. Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Island Press, Washington, DC, 255 pp.
Nelson, D.R., Adger, W.N., and Brown, K.. 2007. Adaptation to Environmental Change: Contributions of a Resilience Framework. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32:395419. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348.
Olsson, P., Gunderson, L.H., Carpenter, S.R., Ryan, P., Lebel, L., Folke, C., and Holling, C.S.. 2006. Shooting the Rapids: Navigating Transitions to Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Ecology and Society 11(1):18.
Ostrom, E. 2007. Sustainable Social-Ecological Systems: An Impossibility? Social Science Research Network, Rochester, New York. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.997834.
Pelling, M., High, C., Dearing, D., and Smith, D.. 2008. Shadow Spaces for Social Learning: A Relational Understanding of Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change Within Organisations. Environment and Planning A 40(4):867884. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a39148.
Plummer, R., and Baird, J.. 2013. Adaptive Co-management for Climate Change Adaptation: Considerations for the Barents Region. Sustainability 5:629642. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su5020629.
Porthin, M., Rosqvist, T., Perrels, A., and Molarius, R.. 2013. Multi-criteria Decision Analysis in Adaptation Decision-Making: A Flood Case Study in Finland. Regional Environmental Change 13(6):11711180. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0423-9.
Qin, X.S., Huang, G.H., Chakma, A., Nie, X.H., and Lin, Q.G.. 2008. A MCDM-Based Expert System for Climate-Change Impact Assessment and Adaptation Planning. A Case Study for the Georgia Basin, Canada. Expert Systems with Applications 34(3):21642179.
Reed, M.S. 2008. Stakeholder Participation for Environmental Management: A Literature Review. Biological Conservation 141:24172431. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014.
Reeder, T., and Ranger, N.. 2011. How Do You Adapt in an Uncertain World? Lessons from the Thames Estuary 2100 Project. World Resources Report Uncertainty Series. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/uploads/wrr_reeder_and_ranger_uncertainty.pdf.
United Nations Climate Change Secretariat. 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). United Nations Climate Change Secretariat, Bonn, Germany, Available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf.
Walker, B., Holling, C.S., Carpenter, S.R., and Kinzig, A.. 2004. Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social-Ecological Systems. Ecology and Society 9(2):5.
Walters, C., and Holling, C.S.. 1990. Large-Scale Management Experiments and Learning by Doing. Ecology 71:20602068. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1938620.
Wheaton, E.E., and Maciver, D.C.. 1999. A Framework and Key Questions for Adapting to Climate Variability and Change. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 4:215225. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009660700150.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Practice
  • ISSN: 1466-0466
  • EISSN: 1466-0474
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-practice
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed