Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS AND CASE STUDIES: Sometimes Less Is Better: Ethics of Public Participation

  • Carie Fox (a1) and Philip Murphy (a2)
Abstract

Most discussions of ethics in public participation emphasize the agency's obligation to engage in more public participation. Yet, ethically speaking, sometimes less is better. If the increased public participation lacks forethought and proper support, it may do serious harm. We analyze three types of ethical breach that may occur when an agency engages in robust public participation: uncomplicated lying or manipulation, failing to provide a fair exchange, and asking for wisdom but failing to support it. As we discuss the need for clear ethics, we look at three constituencies that might be impacted: public participants, the general public, and the resource. Because convening agencies tend to have disproportionate power in a public participation process, we argue that convening agencies (and, through them, their consultants) ought to develop ethical standards addressing the three categories with respect to all three constituencies. Finally, based on our analysis, we suggest that sometimes less public participation is better.

Environmental Practice 14:212–219 (2012)

Copyright
Corresponding author
Carie Fox, 3414 NE Clackamas Street, Portland, OR 97232; (phone) 503-231-6557; (e-mail) Carie.Fox@DaylightDecisions.com
References
Hide All
American Medical Association (AMA). 1957, rev. 2001. Principles of Medical Ethics. AMA, Chicago. Available at http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/principles-medical-ethics.page.
Arnstein, S.R. 1969. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35(4):216224.
Carton, R.J, and Hirzy, J.W.. 1998. Applying the NAEP Code of Ethics to the Environmental Protection Agency and the Fluoride in Drinking Water Standard. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the National Association of Environmental Professionals, San Diego, CA, June 20–24. National Association of Environmental Professionals, Collingswood, NJ, GEN51–61. Available at http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/epa/memos/union/naep1998.pdf.
Dietz, T., and Stern, P.C., eds. 2008. Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 322 pp.
Germain, R.H., Floyd, D.W., and Stehman, S.V.. 2001. Public Perceptions of the USDA Forest Service Public Participation Process. Forest Policy and Economics 3(3-4):113124.
Hippocrates. 2002. The Hippocratic Oath (late 5th century BC), M. North, trans. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Washington, DC, 1 p. Available at http://daedalus.umkc.edu/sandbox/dh/oath/page.0.a.php.
Innes, J.E., and Booher, D.E.. 2004. Reframing Public Participation: Strategies for the 21st Century. Planning Theory & Practice 5(4):419436.
Interagency Initiative to Foster Collaborative Problem Solving and Environmental Conflict Resolution. 2004, rev. 2005. Briefing Report for Federal Department Leadership, Report, U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution. US Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution, Tucson, AZ, 101 pp. Available at http://www.ecr.gov/pdf/BR.pdf.
International Association of Public Practitioners (IAP2). N.d., a. IAP2 Code of Ethics for Public Participation Practitioners. IAP2, Thornton, CO. http://iap2.affiniscape.com/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=8.
International Association of Public Practitioners (IAP2). N.d., b. Practitioner Tools. IAP2, Thornton, CO. http://www.iap2.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=5.
Irvin, R.A., and Stansbury, J.. 2004. Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort? Public Administration Review 64(1):5565.
Jacobs, J. 1994. Systems of Survival: A Dialogue on the Moral Foundations of Commerce and Politics. HarperCollins, New York, 236 pp.
Lehrer, J. 2012. Groupthink: The Brainstorming Myth. New Yorker, January 30.
Moore, M.H. 1995. Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 402 pp.
National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP). N.d. Code of Ethics and Standards of Practice for Environmental Professionals. NAEP, Collingswood, NJ. Available at http://www.naep.org/code-of-ethics.
Rittel, H., and Webber, M.. 1973. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences 4(2):155169.
Seddon, J. 2008. Systems Thinking in the Public Sector: The Failure of the Reform Regime … and a Manifesto for a Better Way. Triarchy Press, Axminster, England, 224 pp.
Stich, B., and Eagle, K.. 2005. Planning to Include the Public: Transportation Policy Implementation with Effective Citizen Involvement. Public Works Management & Policy 9(4):319340.
Sui, D.Z., Elwood, S., and Goodchild, M.F., eds. 2012. Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice. Springer, Berlin, 408 pp.
Tuler, S., and Webler, T.. 1999. Voices from the Forest: What Participants Expect of a Public Participation Process. Society & Natural Resources 12(5):437453.
US Congress. 1969. National Environmental Policy Act: 83 Stat. 852-42 USC Sec. 4321, Pub. L. 91-190, Sec. 2, January 1. US Congress, Washington, DC. Available at http://us-code.vlex.com/vid/sec-congressional-declaration-purpose-19249118.
US Congress. 1972. Federal Advisory Committee Act: P.L. 92-463, approved October 6 (86 Stat. 770). US Congress, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/comp2/F092-463.html.
US Congress. 1980. Paperwork Reduction Act: 44 USC 3501 et seq. US Congress, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/laws/paperwork-reduction/.
US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service. 2000. Code of Scientific Ethics. USDA Forest Service Research & Development, Washington, DC, 20 pp. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/analytics/ethics.htm.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Practice
  • ISSN: 1466-0466
  • EISSN: 1466-0474
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-practice
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed