Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T05:42:23.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perspective: Conserving the Department of Defense's Natural and Cultural Resources: Recent Advances, New Challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

L. Peter Boice
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Points of View
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 2001 , pp. 8 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Department of Defense Instruction 4715.3, 1996Google Scholar, Environmental Conservation Program, 05 3.Google Scholar

2. Boice, L.P., 1997, “Meeting Current Challenges to DoD's Conservation Program,” Federal Facilities Environmental Journal, Spring:29–37.Google Scholar

3. Department of Defense Authorization Act, FY 1998, 1997, Sections 2901–2914, 11 18.Google Scholar

4. DoD Authorization Act, FY 1998Google Scholar, Section 2904.

5. Although not required by legal mandates, it is DoD policy to develop and implement similar integrated cultural resources management plans (ICRMPs) for its cultural resources.

6. DoD Authorization Act, FY 1998Google Scholar, Section 2904.

7. DoD Authorization Act, FY 1998Google Scholar, Section 2905.

8. DoD Authorization Act, FY 1998Google Scholar, Section 2904.

9. Memorandum from the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Environmental Security to the Military Departments, 1998, “Implementation of Sikes Act Improvement Amendments,” 09 21.Google Scholar

10. DoD Authorization Act, FY 1991.1990, Section 8120, (Public Law 101–511), November 5.

11. DoD Authorization Act, FY 1997, 1996, Section 2694, (Public Law 104–201), 09 23.Google Scholar

12. Boice, , Meeting Current Challenges, 33.Google Scholar

13. Memorandum from the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Environmental Security to the Military Departments, 1994, “Implementation of Ecosystem Management in the DoD,” 08 8.Google Scholar

14. Boice, L P., 2000, “Ecosystem Management in the Department of Defense,” in Conservation of Biological Diversity. A Key to the Restoration of the Chesapeake Bay and Beyond, in press.Google Scholar

15. The Nature Conservancy, 1998, Experts Workshop for the Sonoran Desert Ecoregion, Phoenix, 05.Google Scholar

16. Eberly, C., 1999. “Is it a bird? Is it rain?” Bird Conservation, Winter. 10–11.Google Scholar

17. Center for Conservation Research and Technology, 1998, “Scientific Research Rescues Swainson's Hawk before Threatened or Endangered Status Listing is Needed,” Resource Managers' Technical Review, 50.Google Scholar

18. The Defense Environmental Network and Information Exchange (DENIX) website is at http://www.denix.osd.mil.Google Scholar

19. Rubenson, D., Millot, M. D., Farnsworth, G., and Aroesty, J., 1996, More than 25 Million Acres? DoD as a federal natural and cultural resources manager, RAND, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar