Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-bt4hw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T16:52:21.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RESEARCH ARTICLE: Scenario Analysis for Urban Sustainability Assessment: A Spatial Multicriteria Decision-Analysis Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2013

Walter W. Kropp  and
James K. Lein
Walter W. Kropp
Affiliation:
MDA Information Systems, Gaithersburg, Maryland
James K. Lein*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio
*
James K. Lein, Department of Geography, 122 Clippinger Laboratories, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701; (phone) 740-593-1140; (fax) 740-593-1139; (e-mail) lein@ohio.edu
Get access

Abstract

Encouraging a more sustainable urban system requires a reexamination of urban development goals and polices to acknowledge the role that cities play in influencing global environmental change. However, sustainability remains a broadly defined concept that has been applied to mean everything from environmental protection and social cohesion to economic growth and neighborhood design. To guide sustainability initiatives and assess progress toward more sustainable development patterns, there is a need to place this concept into a more functional decision-centric context where change in development proposals can be evaluated in a manner more consistent with future as well as present societal needs. To date, sustainability is assessed within the rubric established by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design system or the Sustainable Sites Initiative. These systems, while useful, are ill-suited to the multifaceted, complex relationships that characterize sustainability. In this study, the problem of sustainability assessment was examined within an urban setting by using a method that coupled scenario analysis with spatial multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA). The integration of a spatial MCDA model for sustainable development with scenario planning resulted in an interpretation of sustainability that is more appropriate for local conditions and useful when exploring sustainability's semantic uncertainties, particularly those alternate perspectives that influence future urban patterns.

Environmental Practice 15:133–146 (2013)

Information

Type
Features
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 133 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Azapagic, A., and Perdan, S.. 2005. An Integrated Sustainability Decision Support Framework. Part II: Problem Analysis. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 12(2):112–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basiago, A.D. 1999. Economic, Social, and Environmental Sustainability in Development Theory and Urban Planning Practice. Environmentalist 19(2):145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berke, P.R. 2002. Does Sustainable Development Offer a New Direction for Planning? Challenges for the Twenty-First Century. Journal of Planning Literature 17(1):21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, P., Hines, A., and Collins, T.. 2007. The Current State of Scenario Development: An Overview of Techniques. Foresight 9(1):5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandon, P.S., and Lombardi, P.. 2005. Evaluating Sustainable Development in the Built Environment. Blackwell Science, Oxford, 280 pp.Google Scholar
Cash, D.W., Adger, W.N., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., Pritchard, L., and Young, O.. 2006. Scale and Cross-scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World. Ecology and Society 11(2):321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
City of Worcester. 2006. Open Space and Recreation Plan 2006. Worcester, MA, 254 pp. Available at http://www.worcesterma.gov/uploads/5b/3b/5b3bdf5e8e8c63d986dbb519f328696f/open-space-plan.pdf (accessed February 18, 2013).Google Scholar
Davidson, K.M., and Venning, J.. 2011. Sustainability Decision-Making Frameworks and the Application of Systems Thinking: An Urban Context. Local Environment 16(3):213–228.Google Scholar
Frame, B. 2008. Wicked, Messy, and Clumsy: Long-Term Frameworks for Sustainability. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26(6):1113–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furedy, J.J., and Bezold, C.. 1999. Alternative Futures for Communities. Futures 31(5):465–473.Google Scholar
Gibson, R.B., Hassan, with S., Holtz, S., Tansey, J., and Whitelaw, G.. 2005. Sustainability Assessment: Criteria, Processes and Applications. Earthscan, Sterling, VA, 220 pp.Google Scholar
Graymore, M.L.M., Wallis, A.M., and Richards, A.J.. 2009. An Index of Regional Sustainability: A GIS-Based Multiple Criteria Analysis Decision Support System for Progressing Sustainability. Ecological Complexity 6(4):453–462.Google Scholar
Haselbach, L. 2008. The Engineering Guide to LEED—New Construction. McGraw-Hill, New York, 392 pp.Google Scholar
Healy, S.A. 1995. Science, Technology, and Future Sustainability. Futures 27(6):611–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, T. 1997. Towards a Conceptual Framework for Assessing Progress towards Sustainability. Social Indicators Research 40(1-2):5–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holowka, T. 2007. USGBC: LEED—Immediate Savings and Measurable Results. Environmental Design & Construction 10(7):13–18.Google Scholar
Hughes, B.B., and Johnston, P.D.. 2005. Sustainable Futures: Policies for Global Development. Futures 37(8):813–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jankowski, P. 1995. Integrating Geographic Information Systems and Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Methods. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 9(3):251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kates, R.W., Parris, T.M., and Leiserowitz, A.A.. 2005. What Is Sustainable Development? Goals, Indicators, Values, and Practice. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 47(3):8–21.Google Scholar
Legget, R.F. 1973. Cities and Geology. McGraw-Hill, New York, 592 pp.Google Scholar
Lein, J.K. 2003. Integrated Environmental Planning. Wiley-Blackwell, New York, 224 pp.Google Scholar
Linkov, I., and Moberg, E.. 2012. Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: Environmental Applications and Case Studies. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 204 pp.Google Scholar
Malczewski, J. 1999. GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis. Wiley, New York, 392 pp.Google Scholar
Malczewski, J. 2004. GIS-Based Land-Use Suitability Analysis: A Critical Overview. Progress in Planning 62(1):3–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martens, P. 2001. Sustainability: Science or Fiction. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy 2(1):5–13.Google Scholar
Mebratu, D. 1998. Sustainability and Sustainable Development: Historical and Conceptual Review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 18(6):493–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, G. 1996. Problems and Fundamentals of Sustainable Development Indicators. Sustainable Development 4(1):1–11.Google Scholar
Munier, N. 2011. Methodology to Select a Set of Urban Sustainability Indicators to Measure the State of the City, and Performance Assessment. Ecological Indicators 11(5):1020–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, L. 2006. Change, Uncertainty, and Futures of Sustainable Development. Futures 38(5):633–637.Google Scholar
Parris, T.M., and Kates, R.W.. 2003. Characterizing and Measuring Sustainable Development. Annual Review Environmental Resources 28:559–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priemus, H. 2005. How to Make Housing Sustainable? The Dutch Experience. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 32(1):5–19.Google Scholar
Remigijus, C., Jolita, R., and Bronislovas, M.. 2009. The Concept of Sustainable Development and Its Use for Sustainability Scenarios. Inzinerine Ekonomika—Engineering Economics 2:28–37.Google Scholar
Singer, S., Wang, G., Howard, H., and Anderson, A.. 2012. Environmental Condition Assessment of US Military Installations Using GIS Based Spatial Multi-criteria Decision Analysis. Environmental Management 50(2):329–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, R.K., Murty, H.R., Gupta, S.K., and Dikshit, A.K.. 2009. An Overview of Sustainability Assessment Methodologies. Ecological Indicators 9(2):189–212.Google Scholar
Smalley-Bowen, T. 2008. The LEED Rating System's Effectiveness Is Dubious at Best. In Eco-architecture, Fisanick, C., ed. Greenhaven Press, Farmington Hills, MI, 155–164.Google Scholar
Sustainable Sites Initiative (SSI). 2008. Guidelines and Performance Benchmarks: Draft 2008. SSI, Austin, TX, 179 pp. Available at http://www.sustainablesites.org/report/SSI_Guidelines_Draft_2008.pdf (accessed August 10, 2011).Google Scholar
US Green Building Council (USGBC). 2009, April. Green Building by the Numbers. USGBC, Washington, DC, 3 pp. Available at http://www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID=3340 (accessed August 10, 2011).Google Scholar
White, S.S., and Ellis, C.. 2007. Sustainability, the Environment, and New Urbanism: An Assessment and Agenda for Research. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 24(2):125–142.Google Scholar
Young, O. 2006. Vertical Interplay among Scale-Dependent Environmental and Resource Regimes. Ecology and Society 11(1):36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar