Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T11:28:33.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Roaring Success versus a Dismal Failure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2005

Charles H. Eccleston
Affiliation:
Environmental Planning and NEPA Services, Richland, Washington
Get access

Extract

In the early 1990s, the US Department of Energy (DOE) initiated a draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Safe Interim Storage of Hanford Tank Waste (New Tank EIS) at the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington. The preferred alternative involved construction of up to six enormous high-level radioactive waste storage tanks, with a total projected price tag of $435 million. The need for additional storage space was considered urgent; project proponents had already decided on the final course of action and were adamant in pushing the project along a particularly aggressive construction schedule, as the project manager was determined to implement this project in record time. The project strategy was straightforward— merely document their decision in the EIS as quickly as possible and then get on with the job of constructing the new tanks!

Type
CASE STUDY
Copyright
© 2003 National Association of Environmental Professionals

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)