Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:56:14.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An improved formate lactose glutamate medium for the detection of Escherichia coli and other coliform organisms in water

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. D. Gray
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory, Newport, Monmouthshire
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A chemically defined fluid medium—improved formate lactose glutamate—is described of which the cost is less than a quarter that of standard MacConkey broth and which is at least equally suitable for routine bacteriological examination of water. It has actual advantages in that the medium after fermentation is clearer and that, therefore, acid and gas production is more easily seen; moreover more isolations of both coliform bacteria and of Esch. coli are obtained with fewer false positive reactions. Trials with a solid version of the medium suggest that the relative freedom from false positive reactions arises from the failure of the medium to grow Cl. welchii—one of the commonest causes—and enterococci, another suspected participant. In fact, without any inhibitory agent the medium appears to be virtually specific for the coliform group and particularly favours Esch. coli. It remains to be seen whether certain aerobic spore-bearers found from time to time in surface waters may, to some slight extent, interfere with the almost complete specificity so far discovered.

The medium is recommended in place of MacConkey broth and other peptonecontaining media, not only for the prospect of better results, in that suppression of the coliform group does not occur, but also for cheapness and for freedom from the inevitable variability associated with media incorporating peptone and, particularly, bile salt. It is hoped that this medium will shortly become available commercially in dehydrated form at a price still considerably less than that required to make up MacConkey broth from its constituents.

Some labour-saving curtailments in the routine of water examination are also suggested.

It is hoped not only that the fluid medium will supplant MacConkey broth for the dilution method of water analysis but that the solid medium, without material alteration, will also prove suitable for water examination by membrane filtration.

I am deeply grateful to my laboratory staff, particularly Mr J. H. Evans, F.I.M.L.T., and Mr G. H. Lowe, F.I.M.L.T., for undertaking so much of the work when routine work was particularly heavy, and for many valuable suggestions. My thanks in addition are due to Mrs Peggy Johnson and Mrs Marilyn Childs, who made up the medium, and also to the directors of the participating P.H.L.S. laboratories not only for having the work carried out but for helpful comments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

References

REFERENCES

American Public Health Association (1955). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water, Sewage and Industrial Wastes, 10th ed.New York: American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
Burman, N. P. & Oliver, C. W. (1952). A comparative study of Folpmers' glutamic acid medium for the detection of Bact. coli in water. Proc. Soc. appl. Bact. 15, 1.Google Scholar
Folpmers, T. (1948). Is it justified to use Lactose Broth for the detection of Bact. coli in the presumptive test of routine water analysis? Leeuwenhock ned. Tijdschr. 14, 58.Google Scholar
Gest, H. (1954). Oxidation and evolution of molecular hydrogen by micro-organisms. Bact. Rev. 18, 43.Google Scholar
Gray, R. D. (1959). Formate lactose glutamate: a chemically defined medium as a possible substitute for MacConkey broth in the presumptive coliform examination of water. J. Hyg., Camb., 57, 249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoather, R. C. (1957). The effect of thiosulphate and of phosphate on the bactericidal action of copper and zinc in samples of water. J. appl. Bact. 20, 180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jebb, W. H. H. (1959). A comparison of media for the detection of coliform organisms in water. J. Hyg., Camb., 57, 184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, A. A. & Misra, S. S. (1938). The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood. J. Hyg., Camb., 38, 732.Google ScholarPubMed
Ministry of Health (1956). The bacteriological examination of water supplies. Rep. publ. Hlth med. Subj. no. 71. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Pinsky, M. J. & Stokes, J. L. (1952). Requirements for formic hydrogenlyase adaptation in non-proliferating suspensions of Escherichia coli. J. Bact. 64, 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
P.H.L.S. Water Sub-Committee (1953). The effect of anaerobic spore-bearing organisms on the validity of the presumptive coliform test as used in the bacteriological examination of water. J. Hyg., Camb. 51, 268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
P.H.L.S. Water Sub-Committee (1958). A comparison between MacConkey broth and glutamic acid media for the detection of coliform organisms in water. J. Hyg., Camb. 56, 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, E. W. (1949). The Examination of Water and Water Supplies, 6th ed. (Thresh, Beale and Suckling.) London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Taylor, E. W. (1964). 40th Report on Water Examination, for the Years 1961–1962, Metropolitan Water Board.Google Scholar
Ware, C. G. (1951). Nutritional requirements of Bacterium coli at 44° C. J. gen. Microbiol. 5, 880.Google Scholar